Category Archives: NEWS

One Direction Responds To Those Totally Believable Harry Styles/Barack Obama Sex Rumors

One Direction Responds To Those Totally Believable Harry Styles/Barack Obama Sex Rumors

6a00d8341c730253ef01bb07c2b635970d-500wiBy now, Harry Styles is as good at deflecting (or creating) cheeky gay rumors as he is at causing 13-year-old girls’ (or boys’) hearts to melt into hormonal sludge at the mere flip of his hair.

But even Harry wasn’t prepared for the recent National Examiner cover story alleging a hush-hush sexual relationship with none other than President Obama.

Are you listening, Aaron Sorkin? This has the makings of the best follow-up episode of The West Wing we’ve ever seen.

The gang was asked about the affair backstage at the Billboard Music Awards. Via the Gay UK:

When Harry, 20, was quizzed about the affair at last night’s BBC Music Awards he seemed unaware of the rumour replying, “I honestly have no idea what you’re talking about” before he then added, after a quick explanation: “I’ve heard some good ones in my time, but that’s interesting.”

Liam added: “Wow, it’s all getting a bit political!” Louis then joked: “So, does that give you some power in the White House then?” as Harry said: “Yeah, maybe.”

Here’s video of the bandmembers’ reactions:

Another day in the life of Harry Styles.

h/t Towleroad

Dan Tracer

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/X2P79tpVoR8/one-direction-responds-to-those-totally-believable-harry-stylesbarack-obama-sex-rumors-20141212

And Now for the Reception

And Now for the Reception
I can honestly say that I wasn’t sure I’d live to see the day when the freedom to marry was something enjoyed by same-sex couples in every state of the union. In fact 20 years ago, when I committed the Los Angeles LGBT Center to fighting for marriage equality, a number of activists warned that our movement would be set back by this battle.

Now, with marriage legal in 36 states (and counting), it’s likely we’ll soon have a Supreme Court ruling that makes it legal for us to marry our loved ones in any state. It’s been so much faster than most of us expected that it’s the closest thing to an LGBT civil rights honeymoon I’ve ever experienced.

But before we think we’re done, let’s remember: just like in real life, after the wedding comes the reception.

What will happen now in states where marriage is legal but public support remains low?

We’ve already seen how politicians like the governor of my birth state of Idaho, Butch Otter, will use our victory to burnish their tea party credentials, continuing their attacks on our families. As we inch toward November 2016, don’t expect to see many politicians from deep red states tout their support for marriage equality. But among folks who aren’t running for office in those states, I think we can expect a continuing shift of opinion.

People who don’t support marriage equality but are otherwise reasonable will begin to change. Just as President Obama purported to “evolve,” they’ll soon realize the future of civilization isn’t at risk simply because their LGBT colleagues and neighbors are getting married.

It would be very wrong, however, to mistake this for the end of LGBT discrimination. Though a majority of Americans now support our freedom to marry, bigotry continues, and it’s often expressed in very harsh ways. For example, the Los Angeles LGBT Center is caring for more homeless LGBT youth — abandoned and shunned by their parents — than ever before. In a majority of states, it’s still legal to fire LGBT people just for being who we are. LGBT seniors continue to face rampant discrimination in retirement and assisted living facilities, and the latest research shows that LGBT people earn less money than our counterparts.

The truth is, even the most historic court victories only start the process. Social change isn’t won top-down, it’s an ongoing effort — often a hard one — to bring discrimination and prejudice to an end. That’s why, by itself, Brown v. Board of Education didn’t solve the problem of race-based prejudice, and Roe v. Wade didn’t end the debate on reproductive justice.

And that’s why the Center’s committed to the work of our Vote for Equality Project, which was featured this week in the highly respected journal Science. We know there’s nothing automatic about reducing and eliminating prejudice, yet it can be done. Our voter persuasion and prejudice reduction work — subjected to the most rigorous scientific measurement — made conservative voters markedly less prejudiced against gay and lesbian people. No other initiative subjected to such rigorous measurement has ever achieved these kinds of lasting results.

It took five years, 1,000+ volunteers and 12,000+ conversations in neighborhoods of Los Angeles where voters crushed us on Prop 8, but what we learned — and what we have now proven in a scientific study — is that we can change the hearts and minds of voters who are against us, or who are conflicted, by coming out to them and discussing their real, lived experience with LGBT people. That’s what enabled voters to not only support our freedom to marry, but to lastingly shed their prejudice against us.

Of course, coming out doesn’t always — and immediately — end LGBT discrimination. Sometimes coming out causes discrimination, even (and especially) by family members. But since the earliest days of the LGBT rights movement, leaders have understood the necessity to change public opinion by being out, and now — for the first time — we’ve proven how right they were.

Now the Los Angeles LGBT Center is applying what we’ve learned in an attempt to reduce other forms of discrimination, including the prejudice against our transgender brothers and sisters and — with funding from Planned Parenthood — the stigma against women who have had an abortion.

So as we celebrate this incredible year, let’s be grateful for the organizations, lawyers, plaintiffs and activists around the country who have moved us so far forward on marriage. They’ve walked us down the aisle.

But we’re not done. Instead, we’re about to experience the broader public reception.

Yes, it’s tempting to think that the courts can do all the work for us. Yes, it’s hard work and can be uncomfortable to talk with voters who disagree with us. But let’s vow to continue the work that has proven to make voters less prejudiced, because marriage is only the beginning of what we need while we work to eliminate LGBT discrimination altogether.

www.huffingtonpost.com/lorri-l-jean/and-now-for-the-reception_b_6311814.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Alabama to Recall 'N0H0M0' License Plate

Alabama to Recall 'N0H0M0' License Plate

License

The “N0H0M0” Alabama license plate that made waves on social media earlier this week, will now be recalled by the state’s Department of Revenue, the Associated Press reports:

Revenue Department spokeswoman Amanda Collier says the license plate with the saying “NOHOMO” slipped past its three-member review panel. She says the state prohibits personalized tags with profane or vulgar messages.

Collier added taht the car owner can appeal the decision. 


Kyler Geoffroy

www.towleroad.com/2014/12/alabama-to-recall-n0h0m0-license-plate.html

Austin Takes Major Steps Forward On Transgender Rights

Austin Takes Major Steps Forward On Transgender Rights

Stabler

Austin on Thursday became the first city in Texas — and the 43rd in the nation — to add transgender-inclusive health benefits for employees.

The City Council unanimously approved a resolution adding trans-inclusive benefits — including primary care, hormone therapy, mental health care and surgical care — beginning in 2015. 

The council also voted to require business owners to install signage indicating that single-stall restrooms are gender-neutral, and approved a resolution on pregnancy guidelines that specifically includes transmen.

Trans activist and HRC board member Meghan Stabler (above), who lives in Austin: 

BREAKING: Today, the Austin City Council unanimously approved a resolution directing the City Manager to incorporate transgender-inclusive benefits as part of the City employee benefits package in the Fiscal Year 2015-2016 proposed budget. Specifically the City Council approved three trans* friendly items:

Ordinance — single occupancy gender neutral restroom signage now required.

Resolutions:
— Directs city manager to incorporate Trans-inclusive health benefits for city employees as part of Fiscal year 2015-16 proposed budget
— Directs city manager to examine workforce practices in other cities regarding personnel policies for **pregnancy-capable** employees & develop recommendations for implementation to council May 1st 2015. – note that the resolution specifically includes transmen.

Express thanks go out to CCM Mike Martinez and Chris Riley for steering this through for the vote. There were several local advocates involved in this for months, well done.

The trans-inclusive benefits were opposed by the Travis County Taxpayers Association, and gender-neutral restrooms faced opposition from the anti-LGBT group Texas Values and its President Jonathan Saenz, according to a recent report from KTBC-TV

“Legally, politically and financially, this is not a smart move by the city of Austin,” Saenz said. “There are major privacy issues and safety issues when we deal with these type of transgender bathroom issues and we’ve seen them come up in Houston and San Antonio, where women are concerned about sharing or having to use a restroom where maybe a man’s gonna come in before or after them, you have small children and little girls.”

Jimmy Flannigan, an openly gay City Council candidate, has also come under attack from his opponent for supporting the gender-neutral restroom proposal. 

But Thursday’s actions by the City Council only further solidify Austin’s reputation as the queerest city in Texas. 

Next up? Rainbow crosswalks

Crosswalks


John Wright

www.towleroad.com/2014/12/austin-takes-major-step-forward-on-transgender-rights.html