A Tea Party Republican in Texas wants to enshrine a “license to discriminate” against LGBT people into the state Constitution.

State Sen. Donna Campbell filed a proposed constitutional amendment Monday that could allow business owners and government contractors to turn away gay people, or fire LGBT employees, under the guise of religious liberty. The amendment could also undermine LGBT-inclusive nondiscrimination ordinances that have passed in all of Texas’ major cities.

Campbell’s proposed constitutional amendment, Senate Joint Resolution 10, states that government “may not burden an individual’s or religious organization’s freedom of religion or right to act or refuse to act in a manner motivated by a sincerely held religious belief unless the government proves that the burden is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.”

SJR 10 goes on to say that a “burden” includes “indirect burdens such as withholding benefits, assessing penalties, and denying access to facilities or programs.”

Jenny Pizer (right), senior counsel at Lambda Legal, told Towleroad that in addition to undermining local nondiscrimination laws, she believes Campbell’s proposal would open up government to all sorts of litigation from people who have religious objections to a wide variety of regulations.

“What it probably means is that the government’s ability to challenge discrimination would be limited,” Pizer said. “While she wants to permit religiously motivated discrimination against gay people, what about religiously motivated discrimination by one religion against another? What if the Jewish doctors decided to stop providing medical services to Christian fundamentalists? 

“It blows a hole in your nondiscrimination protections if people can ignore them for religious reasons,” Pizer added. “It may be designed to trump local nondiscrimination protections, and that’s a serious problem, but the bigger problem for government is the fact that it then becomes prohibitively expensive to enforce things like food safety law. What if somebody has a religious belief that requires them to make large bonfires in the backyard as part of a religious tradition, and you have dry, dangerous fire conditions? There are basic safety regulations. … This is far-right grandstanding, but it’s grandstanding with very serious potential implications for government.”

Campbell, who’s from the San Antonio area, strongly opposed that city’s passage of an LGBT-inclusive nondiscrimination ordinance last year. In a letter to then-Mayor Julian Castro, Campbell wrote:

“San Antonio is an exceptional city in which every individual should feel welcome, and I believe that’s the intent of the authors of the ordinance. However, by alienating a majority of Texans who believe in traditional marriage and values, it is having the opposite effect. San Antonio churches, families and businesses feel less welcome in their hometown as a result of this proposed ordinance, fearful that they may now be penalized or face costly lawsuits just for practicing their faith or expressing their opinion.”

Campbell later told the Houston Chronicle: 

“Our Judeo-Christian values are under assault and I’m not going to let that stand. We have the right and religious freedom to express ourselves. When the government moves outside the proper bounds of the primary role, especially in order to legislate societal norms, they’re on shaky ground. Really it’s a few, just a few advocates, of tolerance. They are trying to criminalize faith and traditional values of the majority of Texans. Tolerance is going too far in this instance.”

Campbell introduced a similar measure two years ago, but it died in committee amid concerns that it would expand the right of Westboro Baptist Church to protest military funerals or even create a religious right to an abortion, according to Texas Monthly. Campbell’s 2013 measure was backed by the anti-LGBT group Texas Values and opposed by Equality Texas. Daniel Williams, legislative specialist at Equality Texas, said Monday that Campbell’s proposal would go far beyond an existing state statute.

“In 1999 Texas set the gold standard for protecting religious liberty with the passage of the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act,” Williams said. “SJR 10 would gut the existing legislation.”

Earlier this year, amid national outcry, Republican Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed a bill that would have allowed businesses to discriminate against gays based on religious beliefs, but a similar law later passed in Mississippi.

Texas cities with nondiscrimination ordinances that could be affected by Campbell’s amendment include Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth and San Antonio. Last year, the Houston City Council passed an LGBT-inclusive nondiscrimination ordinance, but the ordinance is on hold pending a lawsuit from opponents.

At a recent anti-LGBT rally in Houston, opponents of the city’s Equal Rights Ordinance donned T-shirts saying, “We reserve the right to refuse service to homosexuals.”

One Direction’s Louis Tomlinson (seen above in the ‘Story of My Life’ video) lashed out at a reporter at the UK Independent this week after she suggested that his t-shirt bearing a classic Apple rainbow logo was because he supported CEO Tim Cook’s recent statement coming out of the closet.

Wrote reporter Jenn Selby in the article:

Days after Harry Styles’ comment about gender and sexuality became a viral talking point, his bandmate Louis Tomlinson seemingly showed his support for the recently out Apple CEO Tim Cook.

What a difference a week makes. First Harry Styles’ pro-LGBT comments on sexuality, now this: t.co/jaI6OqMgL9 pic.twitter.com/aq3X72jhqq

— IndyPeople (@TheIndyPeople) November 10, 2014

While Selby never says that Tomlinson is gay, her attempt to draw connections between Styles, Cook, and Tomlinson caused the One Direction singer to draw a few conclusions of his own:

@JennSelby The fact that you work for such a ‘credible’ paper and you would talk such rubbish is laughable. I am in fact straight.

— Louis Tomlinson (@Louis_Tomlinson) November 10, 2014

@JennSelby Google ‘original apple logo’ and you will see the one printed on my shirt that you reported on. Trying to look for a promotion ?

— Louis Tomlinson (@Louis_Tomlinson) November 10, 2014

F–king ridiculous I even have to tweet that sh-t !

— Louis Tomlinson (@Louis_Tomlinson) November 10, 2014

Tomlinson’s response is similar to one he offered to a fan two years ago when the fan brought up a nickname (“Larry Stylinson”) that fans had created suggesting he was in a relationship with bandmate Styles.

Mississippi’s gay marriage ban goes before a U.S. District Court Judge Carlton Reeves tomorrow morning. As we reported last month, the Court put Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant, which is being led by DOMA lawyer Roberta Kaplan, on a fast-track after it was filed in October.

Said Kaplan at that time:

“By setting the schedule that it did, the Court clearly appreciated the need for expedition on issues of such great constitutional and practical import. We look forward to presenting our arguments to Judge Reeves on November 12. We are confident that, having read the briefs and heard our arguments, the Court will grant the relief that our clients seek – namely, the right to be treated like all other Mississippi families who love and care for each other, pay their taxes, and do their best to raise their kids.”

Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant (pictured) and Attorney General Jim Hood filed papers on Monday asking Reeves to uphold the state’s ban, the AP reports:

Gov. Phil Bryant and Attorney General Jim Hood responded that the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears cases from Mississippi and two other states, has not recognized gays and lesbians as a group with specific civil-rights protections. Because of that, there is no reason for a federal district judge to give “heightened scrutiny” to claims of bias.

“Mississippi’s traditional marriage laws do not discriminate,” Bryant and Hood said in court papers Monday.

Jackson local news station WAPT filed a report on the hearing last night featuring interviews with two of the plaintiffs, Carla Webb and Joce Pritchett, who have a 6-year-old daughter and a 2-year-old son. Pritchett and Webb were married in Maine but Mississippi won’t recognize their marriage, endangering their two kids.

Rebecca “Becky” Bickett and her longtime partner, Andrea Sanders, who were denied a marriage license earlier this year, are also plaintiffs.

The best case scenario would be for the judge to agree with the plaintiffs and rule immediately, striking down the state’s ban. Advocates say they will be ready with officiants to begin marrying gay couples if that happens.

Watch WAPT’s report on what might happen, AFTER THE JUMP…

Read Kaplan’s “Reply memorandum of law in further support of plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction” filed yesterday, below. Plaintiffs are also represented by Mississippi attorney Robert McDuff of McDuff & Byrd, based in Jackson.

#25 on Scribd”>D.E. #25