Support Grows to Expand Workplace Protections for LGBT Community in Florida
Last week, The Heat Group announced its support for the Florida Competitive Workforce Act (FCWA), which would expand anti-discrimination policies for the LGBT community.
HRC.org
Andy Cohen Plays 'Yank The Tank!', Wants To Spend The Night With Nick Jonas: VIDEO
In addition to dishing on how he managed to piss off Barbara Walters when he co-hosted The View, funnyman and pop culture connoisseur Andy Cohen played a little game of “Yank The Tank!” during his visit to Meredith Vieira’s talk-show the other day. The rules? A bevvy of buff male models had pictures of celebrities hidden under their tank tops. Andy and Meredith took turns guessing what celebrity was hidden under what tank based on clues the other doled out. Winning meant the hunky models joined the winner on a conveniently cramped couch. And the most coveted prize of all (at least for Cohen)? The ginger model.
Find out if Cohen manages to win the ginge, and watch a special bonus video where Cohen reveals just how much he wants to spend a night with Nick Jonas, “a whole night” where he would “get to do everything [he] want[s] to do with Nick Jonas”, AFTER THE JUMP…
Sean Mandell
In the Galleries: Benyamin Reich
Benyamin Reich’s photographs show the tension between sensuality and the strict formality of Orthodox Judaism.
Christopher Harrity
www.advocate.com/arts-entertainment/2014/11/18/galleries-benyamin-reich
Myths About Transition Regrets
Every few months I find myself reading something written by a person with no actual psychological, psychiatric, or medical training expounding on why they believe transgender people aren’t real, shouldn’t be allowed to transition, or just need some old-school “reparative therapy” complete with screaming, pillow whacking and cuddling with a “therapist.”
Recently there has been a spate of blog posts raising the specter of transgender people regretting transitioning. They cite their two favorite studies, without actually looking at what the actual studies said, and drag out some old anecdotes. In short, they try to muddy the waters the way climate-change deniers or creationists do by throwing up a cloud of chaff and hoping no one will look any closer. And then there’s the fact that the authors of these blog posts also think that same-sex marriage will abolish all marriage.
Let’s deconstruct the arguments being trotted out one by one.
1. A Swedish study shows post-operative people are more much more likely to commit suicide.
This statement grossly misrepresents the findings of the study and suggests that the study argues against transition-related care. Quite the opposite. The study outright states that medical transition is supported by the other research, and the study is not intended as an argument against the availability of such treatment:
For the purpose of evaluating whether sex reassignment is an effective treatment for gender dysphoria, it is reasonable to compare reported gender dysphoria pre and post treatment. Such studies have been conducted either prospectively or retrospectively, and suggest that sex reassignment of transsexual persons improves quality of life and gender dysphoria.
Indeed, another Swedish study in 2009 found that 95 percent of individuals who transitioned report positive life outcomes as a result.
Additionally, the higher mortality rates are in comparison with the general populace (and not other transgender people who have not received treatment) and only apply to people who transitioned before 1989:
In accordance, the overall mortality rate was only significantly increased for the group operated on before 1989. However, the latter might also be explained by improved health care for transsexual persons during 1990s, along with altered societal attitudes towards persons with different gender expressions.
It should come as no shock that as society accepts transgender people, they suffer fewer side effects of minority stress. This conclusion is supported by other recent studies (Murad 2010 and Ainsworth 2011) that found that individuals who receive treatment not only are better-off than those who didn’t but are not significantly different in daily functioning than the general population:
Male-to-female and FM individuals had the same psychological functioning level as measured by the Symptom Checklist inventory (SCL-90), which was also similar to the psychological functioning level of the normal population and better than that of untreated individuals with GID….
The mental health quality of life of trans women without surgical intervention was significantly lower compared to the general population, while those transwomen who received FFS, GRS, or both had mental health quality of life scores not significantly different from the general female population.
2. But there’s the 2004 British study that says gender-confirmation surgery (GCS) isn’t effective.
This statement is another gross representation of the research. The study in question was an update of a 1997 study and concluded that between 1998 and 2004, only two studes on the effectiveness of GCS had partially met the criteria of being peer-reviewed and having both a control group and a dropout rate of less than 50 percent. Of those two studies, both showed that patients benefited from the treatment. But the small sample size of the studies prohibited the update from drawing any conclusions on the effectiveness of GCS.
The problem is that meeting the requirement of double-blind studies with control groups using transgender individuals is both impractical and ethically unacceptable, as summarized here:
One problem with medical treatment (and obviously surgery) for transsexuals is that blinding of studies is not possible. It is immediately obvious whether a participant received treatment or not, substitution by placebo will not work for obvious reasons. Clearly, all sex reassignment studies thus fail the gold standard. The next issue is including a control group into the study. This would require to properly diagnose transsexuals, making sure they meet the requirements and indications for sex reassignment surgery, and then to randomly split the participants into two groups — one receiving surgery and one not. Clearly, both groups have to be large for the result to be statistically valid. Then you could measure quality of life of the participants and compare the groups at intervals of several years. That’s the theory, anyway.
In reality, you would find the pressure transsexuals find themselves under grow so much that a large part of the untreated group commits suicide (Haas, Rodgers, Herman 2014) or seeks treatment illegally or abroad. This makes such a study highly unethical, it would never get the okay from an approvals body! You simply cannot withhold treatment from a highly stigmatised group that has a prevalence of 42 to 46 % suicide attempts, compared with 4.6 % in the general population.
But this does not mean there hasn’t been research: Seventy-one peer reviewed articles showing the effectiveness of transition-related medical care can be found here. And in 2014 another study, by Dr. Cecilia Dhejne, the lead author of the first Swedish study described above, addressed the dropout-rate issue in a study of all Swedish applicants for GCS between 1970 and 2010. She found a 2.2-percent regret rate for both sexes, and a significant decline in regrets over the time period.
3. Regret is common.
Surgical regret is actually very uncommon. Virtually every modern study puts it below 4 percent, and most estimate it to be between 1 and 2 percent (Cohen-Kettenis & Pfafflin 2003, Kuiper & Cohen-Kettenis 1998, Pfafflin & Junge 1998, Smith 2005, Dhejne 2014). In some other recent longitudinal studies, none of the subjects expressed regret over medically transitioning (Krege et al. 2001, De Cuypere et al. 2006).
These findings make sense given the consistent findings that access to medical care improves quality of life along many axes, including sexual functioning, self-esteem, body image, socioeconomic adjustment, family life, relationships, psychological status and general life satisfaction. This is supported by the numerous studies (Murad 2010, De Cuypere 2006, Kuiper 1988, Gorton 2011, Clements-Nolle 2006) that also consistently show that access to GCS reduces suicidality by a factor of three to six (between 67 percent and 84 percent).
4. But what about the people who had regrets?
Any surgery comes with a risk of regret. It just happens that the risk of regret for GCS is actually much lower than for many other surgeries. Indeed, the regret rate for GCS compares favorably with gastric banding.
When asked about regrets, only 2 percent of respondents in a survey of transgender people in the UK had major regrets regarding the physical changes they had made, compared with 65 percent of non-transgender people in the UK who have had plastic surgery.
Risk factors for negative outcomes often mentioned in studies are lack of support from the patient’s family, poor social support, late-life transitions, severe psychopathology, unfavorable physical appearance, and poor surgical result (Cohen-Kettenis 2003, Lawrence 2003, Landen 1998, Smith 2005). Lawrence (2003) concluded that results of surgery may be more important for global outcome than preoperative factors. As techniques have been perfected, the risk of long-term complications has fallen to less than 1 percent in male-to-female patients (Perovic 2000, Jarolím 2009, Wu 2009). This follows the pattern of regret rates falling as well.
People who regret physically transitioning are outliers, not the norm.
5. The transgender community is intolerant of people who regret surgery.
No, we just really don’t like it when people try to get between us and our doctors.
Given the level of harm involved when medical care is denied, and given how unusual regret is, denying medical care to everyone based on the outliers makes no logical or ethical sense. In other words, you would do more harm to more people by denying everyone access than by keeping the system we have in place or even expanding access. Every major medical organization supports access to transition-related care and deems it medically necessary for a reason: The actual peer-reviewed evidence supports it.
The standards set in place by the World Professional Organization of Transgender Health Professionals, Standards of Care (SOC) v7, are designed to ensure that regret rates are kept low. Many of the anecdotal cases of regret would have been avoided if the SOC had been followed.
The push shouldn’t be for less access to care but for providers of care who are better-educated.
Gay Star Travel Expo: Discover the hottest gay destinations in 2015
The Gay Star Travel Expo returns to London over the weekend of January 17/18th to showcase the hottest gay destinations in 2015 – from the best cruises to the fiercest party islands
danb
www.gaystarnews.com/article/gay-star-travel-expo-discover-hottest-gay-destinations-2015181114
DVD: “22 Jump Street,” “Twink,” “The Third One,” & More!
Cop comedy, threeway drama (The Third One, above), transgender truth, and twink horror await in this week’s home entertainment line-up! Let’s dive right in!
(TLA)
In this Argentinean import, a college student and 40-something gay couple chat online and decide to take things real-time one night. A slow-burning character piece that gets quite steamy — hey, they’re meeting for a threeway, after all — writer/director Rodrigo Guerrero’s feature delivers the goods and lingers afterwards.
($40.99 Blu-ray, $30.99 DVD; Sony)
Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum‘s undercover officers masquerade as college students to put the kibosh on a drug dealer this time around. Hijinks abound! The overwhelming assortment of extras includes deleted and extended scenes, line-o-rama improv, a commentary and oodles of featurettes.
($19.99 DVD: Live Wire)
From the U.K. makers of Boys Behind Bars comes this twisted, low-budget, shot in one day “mockumentary” about a former porn star-current hot mess, played by writer/co-director Wade Radford.
($14.99 DVD; MVD)
Director Cecilio Asuncion profiles five transgender women in this 65-minute documentary. The subjects include Cassandra Cass, who has appeared in 2006’s Transtasia, CSI, and The Tyra Banks Show. Realness for days, girl!
ALSO OUT:
Sin City: A Dame To Kill For
Come Back to the 5 & Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean
And So It Goes
Alive Inside
Automata
Lawrence Ferber
feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/phQpdtkOltU/dvd-22-jump-street-twink-the-third-one-more-20141118
Op-ed: Seeking Asylum, Finding Strength
One queer person shares his journey from being outed at school in South Africa to seeking asylum in New York City.
Lareto Mokube
www.advocate.com/commentary/2014/11/18/op-ed-seeking-asylum-finding-strength
The Simpsons has saved Benjy the gay bull from slaughter
‘There goes my last lingering thread of my heterosexuality’
joem
www.gaystarnews.com/article/simpsons-has-saved-benjy-gay-bull-slaughter181114
Matt Moore, The “Ex-Gay” Activist With A Grindr Profile, Is Back
Well, this is rather embarrassing.
The Christian Institute, an antigay hate group based in the U.K., just published a blog post by 25-year-old “ex-gay” activist Matt Moore titled “Why my love for Jesus means I refuse to identify as ‘gay.’”
In the piece, 25-year-old Moore, who claims to have renounced his homosexuality in 2010, writes: “Homosexual desires exist within people because people possess sinful natures.”
He also that said if he labelled himself as gay, he would be “uniting” himself with “worldly, godless identity,” whatever the hell that means.
“It is entirely possible to be transparent and communicative about one’s continual struggle with same sex attraction without identifying as gay,” Moore says. “I know, because I’ve been doing it every day for the past four years.”
But there’s a problem. Moore hasn’t been doing it every day for the past four years. In February 2013, he was outed for having a Grindr profile.
At the time, Moore confessed: “Basically I just wanted to see who was on it and who was around me. I can honestly say that I didn’t have any kind of sexual conversations with anyone. Anyone who sent me any kind of explicit photos or conversations, I blocked immediately.”
He continued, “The first time I got on it, I wanted to go out and I wanted to go to the gay bars in New Orleans. So I was trying to meet someone on there to basically tag along with. That was the reason I was originally on it.”
He apologized for having the profile, calling it “wrong” and a “major disobedience to Christ.”
“Thankfully,” he said, “I believe that He forgives me for this disobedience. I believe the blood of Christ covers this disobedience. And I won’t be on Grindr again… ever.”
Evidently, this promise to stay off Grindr forever was enough for the Christian Institute to endorse Moore’s latest rant. And as far as we can tell, the young man has made good on that promise. He no longer maintains a profile on that particular dating app. Of course, there are plenty others he can choose from.
Related stories:
Ex-Gay Activist Caught On Grindr: “Everyone Is A Hypocrite”
It’s “Ex-Gay” Awareness Month! Here Are Five Former Homos And What They’ve Been Up To Lately
New “Christian” Documentary Depicts Tombstone For Gay Past Of Ex-Gay Man
Graham Gremore
New Book Sets Record Straight on Who Won Marriage Equality — and, More Importantly, How
Photo: Jeffrey S. Trachtman
The race is on to shape history’s account of the marriage equality movement, even with the final chapter yet unwritten. Two recent books — Redeeming the Dream, by Proposition 8 slayers David Boies and Ted Olson, and Forcing the Spring, by New York Times reporter Jo Becker — position the famous bipartisan duo as the saviors, if not creators, of the movement.
The latest entry in this genre, Marc Solomon’s Winning Marriage, is a welcome antidote to this super lawyer spin. A brisk, readable, and often exhilarating first-person account of key battles that set the stage for today’s astonishing momentum, it makes clear that parentage rights for this success belong to many.
Solomon’s account understandably focuses on episodes in which he played a role on behalf of MassEquality and Freedom to Marry — in particular, the struggle to beat back a constitutional override of the historic first win in Massachusetts and the two campaigns, the first disappointing and the second triumphant, to pass a marriage bill in the New York State Senate. His blow-by-blow descriptions are rich in personal detail and nail-biting suspense, even for those who know each story’s punch line.
While acknowledging that his account is not exhaustive, Solomon gets the big picture right. Among other things, he properly credits the seminal, decades-long efforts of two visionary leaders — Evan Wolfson of Freedom to Marry and Mary Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) in Boston — groundbreaking litigators and master strategists widely hailed as the Thurgood Marshalls of LGBT marriage equality.
In contrast, Forcing the Spring portrays the marriage issue as languishing in obscurity until 2008, when political consultant Chad Griffin, frustrated by Prop 8, harnesses Hollywood money to hire Boies and Olson. The book opens with a tone-deaf rhetorical flourish — anointing Griffin as the Rosa Parks of marriage equality — and goes on to suggest that Boies and Olson rescued the movement from a discredited state-by-state approach and transformed marriage equality into a national civil rights issue by boldly taking it to the Supreme Court. It essentially treats Bonauto and Wolfson (and everyone else who worked on the issue prior to 2008) as chopped liver. 
This is nonsense. As Winning Marriage more accurately recounts, the state-by-state approach crafted by Bonauto, Wolfson, and others has worked brilliantly. The Prop 8 case — while far from the disaster the LGBT rights establishment feared at its inception and certainly an important chapter in the overall story — served only to restore marriage rights in California originally won by others. It was, rather, the DOMA litigation (in which GLAD won the first trial court victory) and ultimately Edie Windsor’s case (litigated by Robbie Kaplan and the ACLU) that yielded the game-changing Supreme Court ruling.
Perhaps Solomon’s greatest contribution is portraying the hard work of social change — how victory emerged from a broad-based team effort planned and executed over two decades, in which hundreds of activists, organizers, and families had meeting after meeting and conversation after conversation with countless elected officials, staffers, journalists, and voters across the country. He shows how the victories in Massachusetts and New York, along with a crucial handful of other jurisdictions, established a beachhead for a nationwide campaign that won millions of hearts and minds — including, eventually, the president’s. This gradual, painstaking public education process was mapped out and underway for more than a decade before Griffin had his Rosa Parks moment — though of course Boies and Olson lent the effort their own clout and luster.
Solomon’s focus on politics and public education inevitably leaves out a lot on the litigation side. Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, which like GLAD won several crucial early victories (including Iowa), is scarcely mentioned; the National Center for Lesbian Rights, a major player in winning marriage in the California Supreme Court, is omitted entirely. And the New York segment might have benefited from a bit more backstory on the earlier state court constitutional challenge brought by Lambda Legal and the ACLU (with pro bono teams headed by me and Robbie Kaplan). The public education impact of the litigation (including incredulity at the weakness of the court’s stated justifications for sustaining discrimination) helped fuel passage of a marriage bill in the State Assembly within a year — the point at which Solomon picks up his narrative with the ensuing psychodrama in the dysfunctional State Senate.
Winning Marriage recognizes that even such stinging losses can plant the seeds for later triumphs. After Prop 8, advocates became more adept at communicating with religious and other swing voters and, continuing the hard work on the ground, began racking up legislative wins in 2009 and then popular vote victories, including in the 2012 Maine campaign Solomon details in a later chapter. And of course the lessons of the 2009 New York Senate loss informed the better coordinated, victorious 2011 campaign.
Solomon demonstrates that social change doesn’t occur spontaneously or arrive as a gift from above. Even Thurgood Marshall’s victories were built on decades of unglamorous labor by hundreds of others organizing, educating, and persuading as well as litigating. Winning Marriage shows the LGBT community and allies building on that model to make real change. Who won marriage? It may be premature to put that question in the past tense, but Solomon provides the eventual answer: We all did.
You must be 18 years old or older to chat
