Watch: ‘Matt & Dan’ explore that special hell of being approached by someone you can’t place

Watch: ‘Matt & Dan’ explore that special hell of being approached by someone you can’t place

In the latest episode of Matthew Wilkas and Daniel Vincent Gordh’s web series, Matt & Dan, the guys take an awkward social encounter and turn it sideways… several times over. It’s what they do best.

Here’s the all-too-relatable concept: Someone approaches you at a party or a coffee shop and greets you by name, so happy to see you. You have no idea who they are.

Related: Watch: New episode of ‘Matt & Dan’ is a survivor-style mind melt

The conversation progresses as you discreetly hunt for details, hoping not to tip your hand.

Of course, things continue to descend into chaos in episode 5 of Matt & Dan, titled “Best Friends for Never”, which guest stars Julia Cho.

Watch:

 

www.queerty.com/watch-matt-dan-explore-special-hell-approached-someone-cant-place-20190912?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

How TV Cameras Influence Candidates’ Debate Success

How TV Cameras Influence Candidates’ Debate Success

As the Democratic Party continues to winnow its field of candidates to challenge President Donald Trump, it’s important to remember that the way candidates are covered on TV can influence public opinion. That’s become increasingly apparent in today’s media landscape, with several candidates jockeying for coverage during their party’s televised debates.

Scholars of political psychology like me – as well as researchers in other fields – have come to understand that what people see matters more than what they hear when making decisions about the leaders they will follow. A person who sees one candidate more than another will tend to prefer the one they see most – and perhaps be more likely to vote for that person, too.

My research group’s study of the 2016 presidential election found that front-running candidates received more camera time and were the focus of more flattering camera shots at the expense of other candidates.

Something similar appears to be happening in the 2020 Democratic primary race. Our analysis of the initial 2016 Republican and Democratic presidential primary debates found TV broadcasts showed front-runners for more time, and in more flattering views, than their competitors. Using the same method, my collaborators Austin Eubanks, Nicholas Hersom, Cooper Hearn and I analyzed the first and second Democratic Party primary debates, aired June 26 and 27 on NBC, Univision and MSNBC. Frame by frame, we scrutinized the footage on the basis of type of camera shot (head-and-shoulders, multiple candidates, side-by-side and split-screen), who was in the shot and how long.

Visual images sent subtle signals to viewers about the 2016 presidential candidates.

Under the election microscope

In debates, candidates must impress – or at least not disappoint – viewers with their verbal prowess and their nonverbal communication skills. Their performance is limited by the cameras covering them. The production choices of how long to show each candidate and from what viewpoint may influence viewers’ conclusions about the candidates.

Being on screen at all is a big boost, and of particular importance are shots of a candidate alone, showing their head and shoulders. This provides a virtual face-to-face connection with viewers, which can provide a sense of intimacy and social bonding.

Most of NBC’s camera attention – more than 70% on each night – showed one or another candidate in this type of solo view, giving big boosts to those who spent the most time portrayed that way.

NBC spent relatively little time in competitive shots showing candidates either side-by-side or in split-screen. Those choices likely diminished the public’s perceptions of the Democratic candidates’ contentiousness with each other by not providing for candidate-to-candidate visual comparisons.

About one-fifth of the debate footage showed a multi-candidate shot, with three or more candidates in view. This widescreen view visually distances viewers from the candidates by dividing attention. The candidates who appeared most often in this type of shot run the risk of being seen and treated as irrelevant.

The candidates who spent comparatively little of their on-screen time in a wide shot were getting subtly preferential treatment. Most candidates spent about 60% to 70% of their on-screen time in shots with three or more candidates, but there were exceptions. In the first debate, O’Rourke shared only 57% of his shots with other candidates. In the second, Biden shared just 49% of his shots. Those were clear signals that TV producers considered them the front-runners in their respective debates.

Visually signaling winners and losers

What we observed in the June debates led us to hypothesize that those who got the most and best TV attention would do the best as their campaigns continued. The debate lineup bears that out: Of the 10 candidates who qualified for the Sept. 12 debate, all but one were in the top half of their initial debate in terms of total time on camera and the amount of time the camera was focused on their head and shoulders.

Andrew Yang was the only candidate who bucked the trend. He actually had less camera time focused on his head and shoulders than any of the other 19 candidates across the two nights – and spent 80% of his screen time situated with others.

We don’t know whether the choices made by TV producers and directors concerning how often and from which visual perspectives to show specific candidates follow the polls or drive the polls. Indeed, it is likely that a more complex psychological calculus concerning public opinion and market realities is at work.

Regardless, camera choices can subtly inform viewers about which candidates are seen as viable contenders and those who may not have much of a chance. People who watch the debates should be vigilant about how their opinions are being influenced not just by what they hear from the candidates, but how they see them on the screen.

[ Expertise in your inbox. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter and get a digest of academic takes on today’s news, every day. ]

Patrick A. Stewart, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Arkansas

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The post How TV Cameras Influence Candidates’ Debate Success appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.


How TV Cameras Influence Candidates’ Debate Success

3 Surprising Ways to Make Your Dating Profile Stand Out and Help Him See the Real You!

3 Surprising Ways to Make Your Dating Profile Stand Out and Help Him See the Real You!

You already know that online dating is one of the best and often most convenient ways for you to connect with single men. Here is the key to writing a profile that catches the eye of the type of men you want to meet.  Be. Real. That’s it.  When you express who you are and what […]

The post 3 Surprising Ways to Make Your Dating Profile Stand Out and Help Him See the Real You! appeared first on PlentyOfFish Blog.

3 Surprising Ways to Make Your Dating Profile Stand Out and Help Him See the Real You!

Watch: Pro racer James Hinchcliffe removes allll his gear for ESPN Body Issue

Watch: Pro racer James Hinchcliffe removes allll his gear for ESPN Body Issue

It’s ESPN Body Issue season, that special time of year when the sports media property delivers its annual ode to the athletic form.

While the issue hit newsstands last week, ESPN rolls out several video profiles on its featured athletes to ramp up and maintain excitement. It’s not a bad plan.

Relate: Just Try And Pay Attention To Sports Talk While Pitcher Poses For ESPN “Body Issue”

We already heard from the burly Philadelphia Eagles offensive line, and now we’re learning all about the…mechanics…of professional racecar driving from James Hinchcliffe.

Watch:

www.queerty.com/watch-pro-racer-james-hinchcliffe-removes-allll-gear-espn-body-issue-20190912?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

Bowen Yang is SNL’s First Asian Cast Member, and He’s Gay Too

Bowen Yang is SNL’s First Asian Cast Member, and He’s Gay Too

Bowen Yang / Saturday Night Live

Saturday Night Live announced three new cast hires today, stand-up comic Shane Gillis, Groundlings alum Chloe Fineman, and SNL writer Bowen Yang, who appeared on the show last season as North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un with guest host Sandra Oh.

Season 45 Alert

Welcome to the cast, @chloefineman, @Shanemgillis, and @bowenyang!

— Saturday Night Live – SNL (@nbcsnl) September 12, 2019

Yang adds to the roster of LGBTQ cast members who have appeared on the show and he’s the first-ever Asian cast member.

Yang also has a large Twitter presence, and is known for his lip-syncing.

when u gay pic.twitter.com/3q5yJHxIGP

— Bowen Yang 杨伯文 (@bowenyang) May 5, 2018

TV Line reports: “Yang, Fineman and Ellis join returning cast members Beck Bennett, Aidy Bryant, Michael Che, Pete Davidson, Colin Jost, Kyle Mooney, Cecily Strong, Kenan Thompson, Mikey Day, Heidi Gardner, Alex Moffat, Chris Redd, Melissa Villaseñor, Ego Nwodim and Kate McKinnon (who recently inked a new one-year deal). SNL Season 45 launches Saturday, Sept. 28 (NBC, 11:30/10:30c) with host Woody Harrelson and musical guest Billie Eilish.”

The post Bowen Yang is SNL’s First Asian Cast Member, and He’s Gay Too appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.


Bowen Yang is SNL’s First Asian Cast Member, and He’s Gay Too