One in three LGBTQ gamers have faced identity-based harassment in multiplayer games, new report shows

One in three LGBTQ gamers have faced identity-based harassment in multiplayer games, new report shows

A new report out today from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) spotlights the sobering extent of harassment in online multiplayer games. The study is based on a representative survey of video game players in the United States and examines the social experiences of individuals in the online games they play. The top-line finding is that 74% of adults who play online games have experienced harassment of some kind; and further, that 65% have encountered severe harassment, which entails “physical threats, stalking, and sustained harassment.”

Despite the fact that video games are a $156 billion industry (larger than the global film industry) and that 64% of online adults in the U.S. are players, video games have largely been omitted from national discourse about the broader impacts of online social platforms. The ADL report emphasizes that online games are social platforms and indeed some of the most popular platforms available. Games like World of Warcraft and, more recently, Fortnite, have become primary outlets for social interaction for the millions of people who play them. And while these interactions have been a topic of concern within corners of the industry for some time, it’s now clear that much more needs to be done to address the widespread negativity on these platforms.

Perhaps the most pernicious finding of the survey related to the intersection of online harassment with forms of prejudice and hate. The study finds that 53% of those who experienced harassment in online games were targeted for their identity (race, religion, ability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or ethnicity). For LGBTQ players specifically, 35% reported having been harassed for their identity. It’s important to keep in mind that many online gaming interactions, particularly over text-based chat, are quasi-anonymous and that players often limit their own exposure in anticipation of—or in reaction to—harassment. In fact, the report found that 1 in 5 players have avoided a game altogether due to personal experience with harassment or perception of the game’s toxic environment.

However, the report also highlights the positive social experiences of players, which are more common than negative ones. A significant 88% of online players report having had a positive social interaction, such as making a new friend, helping other players, or generally feeling a sense of community. For the LGBTQ community, in particular, games have the potential to be a tremendous force for good. Twenty percent of players learned something new about themselves while playing, something that is commonly described by LGBTQ players who are discovering or coming to terms with their identity.

While a number of recommendations have been offered to reduce incidences of social bias in online games, one key factor is the increased representation of marginalized identities within the game world itself. Last year, GLAAD introduced the Outstanding Video Game category at the 30th Annual GLAAD Media Awards to honor games which lead the industry in LGBTQ representation. The inaugural winner of the award was The Elder Scrolls Online: Summerset, itself a massively multiplayer online game. Through the inclusion of transgender and queer characters in the game, The Elder Scrolls Online is a model for how games can demonstrate to their communities that LGBTQ players are welcomed and accepted.

Last week, GLAAD praised The Sims 4 for featuring an LGBTQ couple on its new box art. While it is primarily an offline game, The Sims 4 nonetheless has a sprawling online social community; the prominent inclusion of LGBTQ characters in the game’s marketing goes a long way in setting the tone for the community at large. GLAAD called on other studios to step up and match this kind of visibility in their games, and we join with the ADL today in calling for greater efforts to ensure safe and constructive social environments in online games as well.

Read the full report at ADL’s website.

July 25, 2019
Issues: 

www.glaad.org/blog/one-three-lgbtq-players-have-faced-identity-based-harassment

Broadway’s ‘Moulin Rouge!’ Is a Dystopian Glitter Bomb of Empty Excess: REVIEW

Broadway’s ‘Moulin Rouge!’ Is a Dystopian Glitter Bomb of Empty Excess: REVIEW

When the first notes of “Lady Marmalade” trill through the Al Hirschfeld Theatre — red dripping from floor to ceiling, the stage crowded with inset hearts — they inspire a palpable sense of déjà vu. A musical based on Baz Luhrmann’s 2001 film seems like a foregone conclusion even before it begins, treading a road already paved by legions of similar screen-to-stage adaptations, jukebox confections, and nostalgia-baiting juggernauts. 

But the Moulin Rouge! that opened on Broadway tonight resembles nothing so much as an absurdly expensive and utterly exhausting game of dystopian karaoke — on a machine that willfully plays only two to three mega-hits at once, or else spits hooks from dozens of chart-toppers like so much machine-gun fire. Pandering at every turn and tailor-made for what its creators must assume has become the attention-deficit generation, Moulin Rouge! makes a persuasive case for marking the nadir of Broadway’s basest instincts. 

While every jukebox score banks in part on audience affection for familiar tunes, the frenetic assemblage of 70 pop songs arranged here by Justin Levine (who’s also credited with music supervision, orchestrations, and additional lyrics) comes at the expense of nearly everything else, including story, character, heart, and often plain old sense. 

The plot, such as it is  — boy meets courtesan, villain completes love triangle, courtesan dies — may not demand much (and John Logan’s book delivers just as little). But when the closest Karen Olivo’s Satine gets to a statement of character is Katy Perry’s “Firework,” a lack of chemistry between her and Aaron Tveit’s bohemian dilettante can hardly be blamed on the performers. The snippets of pop lyrics that constitute their supposedly red-hot affair were written for radio appeal, long since stripped of meaning or impact through repetition. 

The score’s auditory assault of Top 40 faves makes all of the nightclub’s denizens seem more like avatars than real characters, speaking in tongues (Gaga! Britney! The Rolling Stones?) without voices of their own. That several seasoned actors are forced to sing wildly out of their range (Danny Burstein is a treasure, but Sia he’s not) is perhaps cruelest of all.

To translate Luhrmann’s signature celluloid flash and sizzle to the stage, director Alex Timbers deploys ladies of the night (gartered-up and gyrating), confetti (heart-shaped and otherwise), spark fountains (!), and a queen bee’s worth of Valentine doilies to represent… Paris? (Scenic design is by Derek McLane.) A program note detailing the legendary dancehall’s history is the closest Francophiles can expect to nourishment here; the production is French only in the way of stale fries drowned in processed cheese, souring under the glare of too-hot lights.

That Timbers jams all of these sensory flourishes into the opening number alone is the first sign of a production that demonstrates little economy — of spectacle, feeling, humor, or anything that lent the movie its charm. Aside from an overdetermined sign reading “l’amore” in neon, don’t expect much further in the way of visual pageantry. By the time Moulin Rouge! attempts a sharp turn into tragedy (cue the Adele), the lack of blood and soul beneath all that red makes for a dry-eyed demise. 

Recent theatre features…
At First I Didn’t Think ‘Fairview’ Was for Me: REVIEW
‘Hadestown’ Wins Big in Tony Awards Marked by Calls for Empathy, Inclusion: FULL LIST OF WINNERS
Broadway’s Sensational ‘Hadestown’ Wrenches Myth into Modern Times: REVIEW
Keri Russell and Adam Driver Fizzle in Broadway’s ‘Burn This’: REVIEW
‘What the Constitution Means to Me’ is the First Must-See Show of the Year: REVIEW
Temptations Musical ‘Ain’t Too Proud’ Makes a Play for Soul on Broadway: REVIEW

Follow Naveen Kumar on Twitter: @Mr_NaveenKumar

photos by matthew murphy

The post Broadway’s ‘Moulin Rouge!’ Is a Dystopian Glitter Bomb of Empty Excess: REVIEW appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.


Broadway’s ‘Moulin Rouge!’ Is a Dystopian Glitter Bomb of Empty Excess: REVIEW

Shark Week Looms, But Don’t Panic

Shark Week Looms, But Don’t Panic
massive great white shark

massive great white shark

Sharks elicit outsized fear, even though the risk of a shark bite is infinitesimally small. As a marine biologist and director of the Florida Program for Shark Research, I oversee the International Shark Attack File – a global record of reported shark bites that has been maintained continuously since 1958.

We are careful to emphasize how rare shark bites are: You are 30 times more likely to be struck by lightning than be bitten by a shark. You are more likely to die while taking a selfie, or be bitten by a New Yorker. In anticipation of the anxiety that’s typically generated by the Discovery Channel’s Shark Week programming, here are a few things about sharks that are often overlooked.

A big, diverse family

Not all sharks are the same. Only a dozen or so of the roughly 520 shark species pose any risk to people. Even the three species that account for almost all shark bite fatalities – the white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) and bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) – are behaviorally and evolutionarily very different from one another.

The tiger shark and bull shark are genetically as different from each other as a dog is from a rabbit. And both of these species are about as different from a white shark as a dog is from a kangaroo. The evolutionary lineages leading to the two groups split 170 million years ago, during the age of dinosaurs and before the origin of birds, and 110 million years before the origin of primates.

White, tiger and bull sharks are distinct species that diverged genetically tens of millions of years ago.
Gavin Naylor, CC BY-ND

Yet many people assume all sharks are alike and equally likely to bite humans. Consider the term “shark attack,” which is scientifically equivalent to “mammal attack.” Nobody would equate dog bites with hamster bites, but this is exactly what we do when it comes to sharks.

So, when a reporter calls me about a fatality caused by a white shark off Cape Cod and asks my advice for beachgoers in North Carolina, it’s essentially like asking, “A man was killed by a dog on Cape Cod. What precautions should people take when dealing with kangaroos in North Carolina?”

Know your species

Understanding local species’ behavior and life habits is one of the best ways to stay safe. For example, almost all shark bites that occur off Cape Cod are by white sharks, which are a large, primarily cold-water species that spend most of their time in isolation feeding on fishes. But they also aggregate near seal colonies that provide a reliable food source at certain times of the year.

Shark bites in the Carolinas are by warm-water species like bull sharks, tiger sharks and blacktips (Carcharhinus limbatus). Each species is associated with particular habitats and dietary preferences.

Blacktips, which we suspect are responsible for most relatively minor bites on humans in the southeastern United States, feed on schooling bait fishes like menhaden. In contrast, bull sharks are equally at home in fresh water and salt water, and are often found near estuaries. Their bites are more severe than those of blacktips, as they are larger, more powerful, bolder and more tenacious. Several fatalities have been ascribed to bull sharks.

Tiger sharks are also large, and are responsible for a significant fraction of fatalities, particularly off the coast of volcanic islands like Hawaii and Reunion. They are tropical animals that often venture into shallow water frequented by swimmers and surfers.

Sharks are important predators that play critical roles in ocean food chains.

Humans are not targets

Sharks do not “hunt” humans. Data from the International Shark Attack File compiled over the past 60 years show a tight association between shark bites and the number of people in the water. In other words, shark bites are a simple function of the probability of encountering a shark.

This underscores the fact that shark bites are almost always cases of mistaken identity. If sharks actively hunted people, there would be many more bites, since humans make very easy targets when they swim in sharks’ natural habitats.

Local conditions can also affect the risk of an attack. Encounters are more likely when sharks venture closer to shore, into areas where people are swimming. They may do this because they are following bait fishes or seals upon which they prey.

This means we can use environmental variables such as temperature, tide or weather conditions to better predict movement of bait fish toward the shoreline, which in turn will predict the presence of sharks. Over the next few years, the Florida Program for Shark Research will work with colleagues at other universities to monitor onshore and offshore movements of tagged sharks and their association with environmental variables so that we can improve our understanding of what conditions bring sharks close to shore.

More to know

There still is much to learn about sharks, especially the 500 or so species that have never been implicated in a bite on humans. One example is the tiny deep sea pocket shark, which has a strange pouch behind its pectoral fins.

Only two specimens of this type of shark have ever been caught – one off the coast of Chile 30 years ago, and another more recently in the Gulf of Mexico. We’re not sure about the function of the pouch, but suspect it stores luminous fluid that is released to distract would-be predators – much as its close relative, the tail light shark, releases luminous fluid from a gland on its underside near its vent.

The goblin shark, found mainly off Asia, can project its jaw forward to pull prey into its mouth.

Sharks range in form from the bizarre goblin shark (Mitsukurina owstoni), most commonly encountered in Japan, to the gentle filter-feeding whale shark (Rhincodon typus). Although whale sharks are the largest fishes in the world, we have yet to locate their nursery grounds, which are likely teeming with thousands of foot-long pups. Some deepwater sharks are primarily known from submersibles, such as the giant sixgill shark, which feeds mainly on carrion but probably also preys on other animals in the deep sea.

Sharks seem familiar to almost all of us, but we know precious little about them. Our current understanding of their biology barely scratches the surface. The little we do know suggests they are profoundly different from other vertebrate animals. They’ve had 400 million years of independent evolution to adapt to their environments, and it’s reasonable to expect they may be hiding more than a few tricks up their gills.

[ Expertise in your inbox. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter and get a digest of academic takes on today’s news, every day. ]The Conversation

Gavin Naylor, Director, Florida Program for Shark Research, University of Florida

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The post Shark Week Looms, But Don’t Panic appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.


Shark Week Looms, But Don’t Panic