8 Out Athletes at the 2018 Olympics, Illustrated
www.advocate.com/sports/2018/2/05/8-out-athletes-2018-olympics-illustrated
Monthly Archives: February 2018
Frau will BH bei Primark kaufen – dann erfährt sie die eklige Wahrheit
Frau will BH bei Primark kaufen – dann erfährt sie die eklige Wahrheit
- Eine schottische Studentin wollte einen BH bei Primark kaufen
- Doch als sie einen Mitarbeiter nach dem Preis fragte, musste sie etwas Widerliches über das Wäschestück erfahren
Es ist nicht einfach, den richtigen BH zu finden. Sitzt er richtig? Ist er bequem? Hält er so, wie er halten sollte? Ist er schön?
Die Studentin Natalie Brayshaw aus dem schottischen Glasgow hatte Glück. Sie fand in einer Filiale der Modekette Primark einen BH, der ihr wirklich gut gefiel.
Sie probierte ihn an und er passte. Einziger Haken: An dem Wäschestück war kein Preisschild.
“Und ich habe ihn anprobiert”
Also wandte sich Brayshaw an einen Mitarbeiter, um nach dem Preis zu fragen.
Und der sagte ihr, welche eklige Wahrheit hinter dem fehlenden Schild steckte:
Der BH war gar nicht im Primark-Sortiment. Irgendeine Frau musste ihn ausgezogen haben, um einen anderen BH dafür zu klauen.
tried on a bra in Primark & it was nice so I went to buy it but there was no tag so the guy went to find a supervisor to get a code, comes back & goes “this isn’t ours, it’s a swap” so someone has literally left THEIR OWN BRA on a hanger in order to shoplift one AND I TRIED IT ON
— natalie (@n_brayshaw) January 31, 2018
Brayshwa hatte also ein von jemand anderem getragenes Stück Unterwäsche anprobiert.
Mehr zum Thema: Kinderarbeit und Hungerlöhne? So verteidigt der Primark-Chef sein umstrittenes Geschäftsmodell
Sie erzählte ihre Geschichte bei Twitter – und tausende Nutzer reagierten darauf. Die meisten Menschen bekundeten ihre Sympathien.
???? That’s hilarious, it’s hard enough to find a bra that fits well but to discover it’s someone’s second hand one OML laughed out loud on this x
— Julia Wilde (@LifeCoachSpain) February 2, 2018
“Das ist zum Todlachen, es ist schwer genug, einen BH zu finden, der gut passt, aber herauszufinden, dass es ein gebrauchter von jemand anderem ist, finde ich sehr lustig”, schreibt eine Frau.
? Thanks for sharing your horror story all us women will now be checking for tags everywhere we go. ??
— Sophie Matthews (@SMatthews28118) February 1, 2018
Eine andere Frau dankt Brayshaw dafür, dass sie ihre “Horror-Geschichte” auf Twitter geteilt hat. Ab jetzt würden alle Frauen überall wo sie hingehen schauen, ob die Kleidung auch wirklich ein Preisschild habe.
Und die Geschichte scheint bei Weitem kein Einzelfall zu sein. User berichteten auch über ihre Erfahrungen, wie Menschen neue gegen alte Kleidung auf dem Bügel eintauschen.
I used to work in Topshop, people did this with jeans All. The. Time! With a bra is proper nasty though!
— Jodie (@JodieTip) February 2, 2018
“Ich habe bei Topshop gearbeitet und Menschen haben das mit Jeans die ganze Zeit gemacht. Mit einem BH ist es aber schon ziemlich eklig”, schreibt eine Frau.
Mehr zum Thema: An die Eltern, deren Töchter bei Primark einkaufen
(amr)
자넷 잭슨이 슈퍼볼 하프타임쇼 도중 트위터에서 트렌딩한 이유
자넷 잭슨이 슈퍼볼 하프타임쇼 도중 트위터에서 트렌딩한 이유
제52회 슈퍼볼이 4일 밤(현지시각) 미국 미네소타주 U.S. 뱅크 스타디움에서 열렸다. 이날 하프타임쇼의 주인공은 저스틴 팀버레이크였다. 지난 2004년 자넷 잭슨과 무대에 올랐다가 방송사고를 낸 이후 14년 만에 다시 슈퍼볼로 돌아온 것이다.
팀버레이크는 이날 자신의 히트곡인 ‘섹시 백‘(Sexy Back)과 ‘수트 앤 타이’(Suit & Tie) 등을 불렀고, 지난 2016년 세상을 떠난 프린스를 위해 헌정 무대를 선보였다.
무대에 선 건 팀버레이크였지만, 정작 주목을 받은 건 자넷 잭슨이었다. 하프타임쇼가 진행되는 동안, 트위터에서는 ‘자넷 잭슨 감사절’(Janet Jackson Appreciation Day)과 ‘자넷에게정의를’(Justice For Janet)이라는 해시태그가 트렌딩했다.
저스틴 팀버레이크는 2004년 하프타임쇼에서 자넷 잭슨과 ‘락 유어 바디’(Rock Your Body)를 부르던 중 잭슨의 상의를 잡아당겼고, 결국 가슴 노출 사고를 일으키고 말았다. 당시 두 사람은 노출 사고에 대해 사과했지만, 피해를 본 건 자넷 잭슨이었다. CNN에 따르면 팀버레이크는 당시 사건 이후에도 무사히 활동을 이어 나간 반면에 자넷 잭슨은 여러 방송국이 수년간 그의 노래를 재생하는 것을 거부하는 등 활동에 어려움을 겪어야 했다.
이에 팬들은 이날을 빌어 자넷 잭슨에게 감사를 표하기로 했다. 비록 슈퍼볼 하프타임쇼에는 다시 서지 못했지만, 2018 슈퍼볼의 진정한 주인공은 저스틴 팀버레이크가 아니라 자넷 잭슨이라고 주장한 것이다.
In 1997 Janet released an anthem to a friend she lost to HIV/AIDS called Together Again. It’s a beautiful and empowering song, and the video she released with it is stunning. #JanetJacksonAppreciationDaypic.twitter.com/erZxhrPjZO
— Calvin (@calvinstowell) February 4, 2018
자넷 잭슨은 지난 1997년 HIV/AIDS로 사망한 친구를 위한 헌정곡 ‘투게더 어게인’을 발표했다. 아름답고 들으면 힘이 나는 곡이다. 함께 발표한 뮤직비디오도 멋지다. #자넷잭슨감사절
Janet released a whole album, went on tour, decided to PAUSE to have a fresh baby at age 50, dropped that billionaire hub, and went back out on tour like nothing happened.
Your fav could never. #JanetJacksonAppreciationDay
— Carli B (@Lalabee79) February 4, 2018
자넷은 50살에 새 앨범을 내고 콘서트 투어를 다녀왔으며 아이를 낳기 위해 활동을 잠시 중단하기로 했다. 그리고 백만장자인 남편을 버렸고, 아무 일도 없는 것처럼 다시 콘서트 일정에 돌입했다.
당신이 가장 좋아하는 가수는 이렇게 하지 못 할 것이다. #자넷잭슨감사절
Every day is #JanetJacksonAppreciationDay. pic.twitter.com/pRnlBGDiSV
— Alexander Hardy (@chrisalexander_) February 4, 2018
매일이 자넷 잭슨 감사절이다.
One of the most iconic dance breaks of all time. When will your faves?#JanetJacksonAppreciationDaypic.twitter.com/Zn6yXUJ8mt
— Legendary Haus of Choi (@topismyhomeboy) February 4, 2018
이건 역대 최고의 댄스 브레이크다. 당신 ‘최애 가수’의 댄스 브레이크는 언제 이런 평가를 받을 것인가? #자넷잭슨감사절
자넷 잭슨의 슈퍼볼 복귀설은 팀버레이크의 출연이 확정된 이후 수차례 제기됐지만, 잭슨은 3일 자신의 트위터를 통해 하프타임쇼에 출연하지 않는다고 해명했다.
— Janet Jackson (@JanetJackson) February 4, 2018
내가 내일 슈퍼볼에서 공연한다는 의혹과 루머에 끝을 맺기 위해 적는다. 나는 공연하지 않을 예정이다. 여러분의 응원에 감사하고 곧 다시 만나기를 기대한다.
한편, 저스틴 팀버레이크는 지난 1월, 비츠1 라디오에 출연해 2004년 사건을 두고 잭슨과 화해했다고 밝혔다. 이에 대해 잭슨의 가족 측은 뉴욕포스트에 ”저스틴의 솔로 커리어는 그 사건 이후 날개를 펼쳤지만, 자넷의 커리어는 곤두박질쳤다”라며 팀버레이크에게 재차 사과를 요구한 바 있다.
www.huffingtonpost.kr/entry/janet-jackson_kr_5a780f7ee4b06ee97af48284
16歳女子高生、南極点から「サンドイッチ」で反撃 ユーモアで差別に対抗、世界から賞賛
16歳女子高生、南極点から「サンドイッチ」で反撃 ユーモアで差別に対抗、世界から賞賛
16歳の女子高生スキーヤー、ジェイド・ハマイスターは「ポーラー・ハットトリック」という偉業を達成した。これは、南極点と北極点、グリーンランド氷床の3カ所をスキーで踏破するもので、16歳は史上最年少だという。
その彼女が撮った一枚の写真が、ネットで大きな話題を呼んでいる。
今年1月10日、37日間に及ぶ冒険の末、南極のアムンゼン・スコット基地にたどり着いたジェイド。セレモ二アル・ポールと呼ばれる南極点標識の隣で、誇らしげに国旗を掲げている。注目のポイントは、彼女が手に持っているサンドイッチだ。
一体なぜサンドイッチなのだろうか。
彼女は写真のコメントで、その秘密を明かしている。
「ほら、あなたのためにサンドイッチを作りましたよ （ハム＆チーズ入り）。37日間、600㎞の距離をスキーで旅して南極点まで来られるんだったら、どうぞ召し上がってください 」
この”あなた”とは、彼女に対して性差別的なコメントをした、あるネットユーザーのことだ。
話は2年前にさかのぼる。
若い女性というだけで、否定的なコメントを浴びせられます。「女性は少食で、着飾らず、痩せて、身の丈にあった野望を持て」「いつか白馬の王子さまが来て、救ってくれるのを待ってろ」なんて言われるんです。それは、「女は強くない」っていう男性的な決めつけではないでしょうか。
そして、今回。彼女のユーモア溢れる「反撃」は、世界中の人たちの心を動かした。
投稿には「おめでとう！最高にかっこいい」「あなたは強さと意思の象徴ですね。心からインスパイアされました」「めっちゃ笑った」といった、賞賛コメントが無数についている。
16歳にして、世界中の女性に勇気を与えたジェイド。彼女はこれからも、きっと新たな記録を打ち出していく。
Han Solo Film Trailer: ‘Star Wars’ Fans Given First Look At Spin-Off Film (And It Actually Looks Pretty Good)
Han Solo Film Trailer: ‘Star Wars’ Fans Given First Look At Spin-Off Film (And It Actually Looks Pretty Good)
‘Star Wars’ fans were given their first look at the upcoming Han Solo spin-off movie on Sunday (4 February) night and – perhaps surprisingly… – the film actually looks pretty good.
It’s no secret that ‘Solo: A Star Wars Story’, to give it its full title, has been marred by production issues, with directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller leaving midway through filming, citing “creative differences” with production company LucasFilm.
Thankfully, Ron Howard swiftly stepped up to take over and the results of his efforts have finally been revealed.
A full trailer will arrive later today (Monday 5 February), when it’s debuted on ‘Good Morning America’. Fingers crossed, the longer clip will reveal more about what we can expect from the film’s plot.
In the meantime, let’s take a second to appreciate the best bit of this teaser, this wonderful shot of Donald Glover as Lando Calrissian:
Yup, we’re officially excited.
Alden Ehrenreich will play a young Han in the film and he’s (briefly) featured at the end of the trailer, while we get a full look at Emilia Clarke as Qi’ra and Beckett, played by Woody Harrelson.
‘Solo: A Star Wars Story’ is set for release in the UK on Friday 25 May. Watch the teaser clip above.
The Waugh Zone Monday February 5, 2018
The Waugh Zone Monday February 5, 2018
1 CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
Winter is finally beginning to bite as sub-zero temperatures hit the UK this week. But ministers are still split between those who think life outside the warm embrace of the EU’s customs union will plunge our economy into the deep freeze – and those who think the sunlit uplands beckon once the cold, clammy hand of Brussels is lifted from our buccaneering businesses.
Ahead of the crunch meeting of the Cabinet sub-committee on Brexit this Wednesday, there is at least an emerging consensus that Theresa May has approved a form of words the whole team can live with. It turns out that Liam Fox was not freelancing last week in China when he suggested the UK had to stay out of any form of customs ‘union’.
No.10 sources last night backed him up firmly, declaring: “To put this to rest, we are categorically leaving the customs union… we must also be free to sign those trade deals with the rest of the world.. So it is not our policy to stay in the customs union. It is not our policy to stay in a customs union”. Or, as another senior aide put it to me this morning: “The key point, as the PM said about 15 times last week, is we need to have freedom to sign trade deals”.
Two political imperatives seem to be at work here: May needs the Brexiteers (led by the Jacob Rees-Mogg) on board; the Brexiteers need May in place to avoid a leadership race that could derail Brexit itself. And, crucially, Remainer ministers seem pretty relaxed about the semantic debate, happy that the two options devised are “a customs partnership” or “a highly streamlined customs arrangement”.
As I’ve written before, members of the Cabinet sub-committee prefer its discussions to a full Cabinet as the debate is less about grandstanding and more about finding common positions. The Times reports that there is one compromise in the air, whereby Philip Hammond agrees to trade deals with non-EU states in return for a limited extension of the current customs union. Ministers tell me that Boris is frequently the one in Cabinet who is often a lone voice on Brexit, a factor that could endear him to backbench Eurosceptics in any future leadership race, if he walks out. Few suspect he will actually quit if he doesn’t get what he wants. But will he spring another surprise and prove them all wrong, just as he shocked David Cameron in coming out for Vote Leave in early 2016? We are nearly exactly two years from his fateful announcement back then.
There’s also a suspicion that some Remainers in Cabinet are going along with ‘cake and eat it’ demands of the EU in the full expectation that Brussels will refuse. Some of them think that the word ‘union’ or ‘arrangement’ is irrelevant, as long as the outcome is very similar to today’s frictionless trade with the EU (and are happy for the Brexiteers to have a propaganda ‘victory’ on words, but not on substance). Michel Barnier is in London today for a meeting with David Davis. There’s no press conference, but Barnier’s statement will be worth watching to see his reaction to the UK ruling out ‘a’, as well as ‘the’ customs union. Will he help May to sell a workable solution to her party? Or make life more difficult?
2. APOTHECARY HYPOTHECARY
Will there ever be a political consensus on how to fund the cost of our ageing population while keeping the NHS free at the point of use? The UK somehow managed to find cross-party agreement on increasing the state pension age (another big ticket item) in a way that few other countries have managed. But on health and social care, a similar long-term solution is desperately needed yet often seems further away than ever.
Today a panel of health experts set up by the Lib Dems has come up with what many expect will one day be part of the answer: a ring-fenced (‘hypothecated’ in the jargon) tax to provide the funds needed. What may make politicians sit up and take notice is that the panel includes former NHS chief exec Sir David Nicholson, former Royal College of GPs chief Claire Gerada and former RCN chief Peter Carter.
Their report suggests a new combined health and social care tax, which would take in bits of council tax and a reformed National Insurance levy. Reinstating a cap on the cost of personal social care is also among the recommendations. There will be disagreement about the detail but with Tory MPs like Nick Boles recently backing the idea of a special tax for the NHS, it is at least a starting point for debate. Labour is wary of any cross-party working not least after the Lansley-Burnham ‘death tax’ bitterness, but will Parliament take the lead on this and prod the parties towards a solution? Let’s see.
3 BENEFIT GIG
New Work and Pensions Secretary Esther McVey makes her debut at her departmental question time in the Commons today. Universal Credit and Carillion pensions will feature, but one question that caught my eye is from the SNP’s Martyn Day that askes for “an assessment of the effect of the benefit freeze on the use of food banks”. So far, McVey has taken steps to defuse criticism of the harsher elements of welfare policy, but on this one she may well dig in.
Many think tanks say that in-work poverty stems from not just the earnings squeeze but specifically from George Osborne’s four-year benefit freeze (most working-age benefits frozen at 2015/16 cash values from 2016/17 to 2019/20 inclusive) and today the main business of the Commons is a debate on the Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2018. Given that this will seek to continue benefits (other than for pensioners and the disabled) do not rise in line with inflation, will Labour try to sneak in a vote? There’s another issue too in that half a million expat pensioners don’t get any uprating.
Meanwhile, speaking of keeping pace on the income front, the new IFS report on the gender pay gap shows how far we have to go to help parents who take part-time work during a career break. In this anniversary year of women’s suffrage, we discover that by the time a first child reaches the age of 20, mothers earn around 30% less on average than similarly educated fathers. The IFS doesn’t offer solutions but better back-to-work skilling and fairer childcare are among the policies campaigners want to see.
BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR…
Watch this thief slip up (literally) after trying to steal some packages from a porch.
4. LODGER THE DODGER
The Guardian reports that Freemasonry records have revealed that the secretive organisation has two active lodges operating in Parliament. One, New Welcome Lodge, recruits MPs and staff. Another, Gallery Lodge, is for Gallery and Lobby reporters. The United Grand Lodge of England claims no new members have joined the journalists’ lodge since 2000, which would fit with gossip years ago that a small group of older hacks were masons.
I do recall once arriving early for a Commons meeting, in a little-known part of the House, to find all the chairs arranged in a very odd manner indeed, and hearing a rumour that this was where masons had met. Verifying anything was impossible. What’s particularly odd is that neither MPs nor journalists are required to declare their membership in the Commons register of interests. Surely if there’s nothing to hide, transparency is now long overdue?
5. GREAT WALL OF CYBER
On the trip to China with the PM last week, all of us in the British delegation were more than aware of the hacking threat. No10 staff had taken ‘burner’ phones to avoid being compromised and few used Gmail or Twitter blocked by the authorities. The FT has an advance of a report out today from GCHQ’s National Cyber Security Centre showing the scale of the threat at home too.
The NCSC took down more than 120,000 fake websites last year and blocked 54m malicious online attacks as part of a “great British firewall” designed to stop cyber criminals targeting the public for money and secret data. Fake HMRC sites were the most prevalent. Sadly, today’s report won’t include attacks by ‘hostile state actors’ such as China, North Korea or Russia. But this is the first time we’ve had information about “commodity attacks” that caused “the majority of people the majority of harm”.
SUNDAY SHOWS ROUND-UP
Had a lie-in? Got a life? Catch up with our quick round-up of the Sunday politics shows HERE.
If you’re reading this on the web, sign-up HERE to get The Waugh Zone delivered to your inbox.
Got something you want to share? Please send any stories/tips/quotes/pix/plugs/gossip to Paul Waugh, Ned Simons, Kate Forrester, Rachel Wearmouth and Owen Bennett.
To pitch a blog post on HuffPost, email Charlie Lindlar or the blog team.
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/the-waugh-zone-monday-february-5-2018_uk_5a781975e4b0905433b63376
Celebration NYE17/18
Celebration NYE17/18
PointsOfDifferenceEvents posted a photo:
Amazing gay cocktail party produced by Points of Difference Travel & Events @ The MCA, Sydney.
Alice Weidel bei “Anne Will”: Schon der erste Satz sorgt für Kopfschütteln
Alice Weidel bei “Anne Will”: Schon der erste Satz sorgt für Kopfschütteln
- In der Talksendung “Anne Will” soll über die kommende Große Koalition diskutiert werden
- Auch AfD-Politikerin Alice Weidel ist dabei – und nutzt die Zeit für eine typische Provokation
Wer Alice Weidel in eine Talkshow einlädt, weiß, was sie bekommt. Inhaltliche dünne Argumente, rechte Provokationen – und bisweilen einen inszenierten Abgang.
Letzteren gab es am Sonntagabend bei “Anne Will” nicht. Dafür aber eine typische weidelsche Provokation. Denn eigentlich sollte es in der Sendung um die kommende GroKo und deren in den Koalitionsgesprächen ausgehandelten Inhalte gehen.
Doch Weidel nutzte schon die erste Frage an sie für eine ihrer populistischen Show-Einlagen.
Gruß nach Cottbus
Eigentlich wollte Moderatorin Anne Will von der AfD-Politikerin wissen, was sie von der Abschaffung von sachgrundlosen Befristungen halte.
Weidel jedoch würdigte diese Frage zunächst keiner Antwort. Stattdessen versuchte sie, die Diskussion auf das einzige Thema zu lenken, dass ihre Partei besetzt: Den Kampf gegen Flüchtlinge.
Das Grundproblem sei, dass die Regierungsparteien nicht sensibel für die “wahren Probleme der Menschen” seien.
► “Und darum geht auch mein erster Gruß raus an die Menschen in Cottbus, die für ihre Probleme demonstrieren.”
Die Reaktionen der anderen Gäste und des Publikums: Kritische Blicke, Kopfschütteln, ungläubiges Lachen.
Mehr zum Thema: Wutduell im Bundestag: AfD-Mann hält Hetzrede – dann dreht Toni Hofreiter auf
Zur Erinnerung: Zuletzt war es geballt zu Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Deutschen und Flüchtlingen in Cottbus gekommen. So hatten unter anderem jugendliche Syrer ein Ehepaar vor einem Einkaufszentrum attackiert. Zum Jahreswechsel hatten Unbekannte Flüchtlinge in ihrer Unterkunft angegriffen.
Nun ziehen immer wieder islamfeindliche Demonstranten durch die Stadt – unter diesen sowohl Politiker der AfD als auch viele Rechtsextreme.
Weidel: “Messerstechende Migranten”
So fragte Will dann auch nach, ob Weidel nur diese Demonstranten grüße. Schließlich kommt es in Cottbus derzeit auch zu Gegendemos für ein friedliches Miteinander in der Stadt.
Die AfD-Frau reagierte mit einem gedehnten “Ja” und ätzte dann gegen die Medien und deren angeblich “einseitige Berichterstattung”.
“Das sind einfach nur Menschen die sich dagegen wehren, dass hier messerstechende Migranten auf unseren Straßen rumlaufen”, sagte sie über die Pegida-artigen Proteste in Cottbus.
Sie fügte hinzu: “Und da ist ja letztendlich das Grundproblem: Das ist eine Politik, die komplett die Bodenhaftung verloren hat.”
Mehr zum Thema: So unsäglich reagieren AfD-Politiker auf den “Will”-Talk zu Judenhass
Anschließend ließ Weidel sich dann doch noch überreden, auch auf Wills Eingangsfrage zu antworten. Sachgrundlose Befristungen abzuschaffen, treibe die Menschen in die Leiharbeit, sagte sie.
► Für den Rest der Sendung kommt Weidel dann kaum noch zu Wort.
Einmal darf sie noch Steuerentlastungen für hohe Einkommen fordern; später bestreitet sie gespielt empört, ihre Partei setze sich nicht für die Integration von Flüchtlingen ein – nur, um im gleichen Atemzug konsequentere Abschiebungen aus Deutschland zu fordern.
“Wir haben einen permanenten Gesetzesbruch an unseren Grenzen”, ereiferte sich Weidel da. “Nein, haben wir nicht”, antwortete ihr NRW-Ministerpräsident Armin Laschet (CDU).
Aber für Inhalte war es da schon zu spät. Weidel hatte ihre AfD-Show wieder einmal erfolgreich zu bester Sendezeit durchgezogen.
Mehr zum Thema: Weidel und der Medienhass: Wie die AfD-Politikerin versucht, den öffentlichen Rundfunk zu attackieren
www.huffingtonpost.de/entry/alice-weidel-afd-anne-will_de_5a77e99ce4b06ee97af46354
키디비 측이 블랙넛의 ‘추가 범죄’를 언급했다
키디비 측이 블랙넛의 ‘추가 범죄’를 언급했다
지난해 6월, 래퍼 블랙넛은 노래 가사를 통해 래퍼 키디비를 수차례 성희롱했음에도 ‘단순 모욕혐의’로 기소됐다. 이에 키디비 측은 ”항고를 진행하고 있다”며 ”추가 범죄사실도 발견돼 수사 중”이라며 강경대응할 것이라는 입장을 밝혔다.
5일 일간스포츠는 키디비 측과의 인터뷰를 진행했다. 키디비의 법률대리인 김지윤 변호사는 ”블랙넛의 앨범발매행위 등을 성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한 특례법 위반, 예비적으로 정보통신망법위반 등으로 고소했으나 원하던 혐의 아닌 모욕죄로 적용됐다”라며 유감을 표했다. 키디비 측은 ”불기소처분을 받은 2건에 대해 항고를 했다”며 확실한 피해 회복을 언급했다.
키디비 법률대리인은 ”이것은 심각한 성폭력인데도 성폭력법(통신매체이용음란죄) 등이 불기속 기소된 것은 유감이다”라며 ”성폭력법의 통신매체이용음란죄는 통신매체를 통해 음란한 글이나 음향을 상대에게 도달하게 한 자를 처벌하는 조항이다. 피의자가 노래를 온라인에 발매한 것이 인정되는데도 이것이 통신매체를 통한 것은 아니라는 이유로 불기소처분이 됐다”고 전했다.
OSEN에 따르면 키디비 법률대리인 측은 ”현재 노래발매 범죄 이외에도 블랙넛의 키디비를 향한 추가적인 범죄사실이 발견돼 수사 중에 있다”라며 ”관련 자료를 준비 중”이라고 전했다.
또 이번 고소가 ‘힙합 디스문화’를 부정하는 것이 아니냐는 질문에 키디비 측은 ”복싱을 하는 선수들에게 폭행죄가 인정되지 않듯, 블랙넛의 행위가 디스문화의 범주에 속하는 행동이라면 우리도 고소하지 않았을 것”이라며 ”그러나 블랙넛의 행동은 디스의 범주를 넘어선 것이고, 단지 피해자를 일방적 성추행한 것”이라고 전했다.
연합뉴스에 따르면, 당초 서울 방배경찰서는 지난해 9월 성폭력범죄 등에 관한 특례법 위반(통신매체 이용 음란) 및 모욕 혐의를 적용해 기소 의견으로 검찰에 송치했으나 서울중앙지검 여성아동범죄조사부(홍종희 부장검사)는 이중 모욕죄만을 적용해 불구속 기소한 것으로 나타났다. 블랙넛의 첫 재판은 오는 3월 15일 열린다.
www.huffingtonpost.kr/entry/story_kr_5a77f84de4b01ce33eb4933e
