This Artificial Heart ‘Patch’ Can Repair You After A Heart Attack

This Artificial Heart ‘Patch’ Can Repair You After A Heart Attack
Scientists at Duke University have created a fully-functioning artificial heart muscle that can actually be patched over the damage caused by a heart attack.

This beating ‘patch’ then acts like a giant living plaster and is able to beat just like a healthy muscle and can even receive the electronic instructions sent to the rest of the heart.

It is a remarkable step forward in how we treat patients who have suffered a heart attack.

The heart, very helpfully, is one of the few organs that cannot regenerate itself which means that after a heart attack the damage done is permanent.

The dead muscle is then often turned into scar tissue which is neither elastic enough or capable of transmitting the electrical signals needed to tell the muscles how to behave.

These breakdowns in function often lead to something known as heart failure which can over a long period of time, become fatal.

Current experiments to combat this have included injecting the affected area with stem cells – the remarkable ‘blank’ cells of the body that can be programmed to become anything we need them to be.

Unfortunately this hasn’t worked as well as expected. Fewer than 1% of the cells survive and even less then actually transform into the cardiac cells that are needed.

A patch however accepts that we can’t regrow the heart and instead acts just like an artificial limb.

Placed over the dead tissue, the patch is made up of artificially grown heart cells which allow it to contract just like a real heart muscle and even receive and conduct the electrical signals sent throughout the organ.

The biggest hurdle for the researchers has been creating the patch at scale. The largest they’ve managed thus far reaches to around 16 square centimetres.

That might sound quite big but the patch is only a few cells thick. For it to be resilient enough to be patched onto a human heart it’s going to need to be a lot thicker and a lot tougher.

“This is extremely difficult to do, as the larger the tissue that is grown, the harder it is to maintain the same properties throughout it,” explains Nenad Bursac, professor of biomedical engineering at Duke.

“We are actively working on that, as are others, but for now, we are thrilled to have the ‘size matters’ part figured out,” he added.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/this-artificial-heart-patch-can-replace-entire-muscles-after-a-heart-attack_uk_5a1d9968e4b06a14100a6301

Lady Gaga, Kesha, Justin Tranter, Shane McAnally among LGBTQ-inclusive Grammy nominees

Lady Gaga, Kesha, Justin Tranter, Shane McAnally among LGBTQ-inclusive Grammy nominees

Justin Tranter
GLAAD

Nominations were announced this morning for the 60th Annual Grammy Awards, and the list includes several LGBTQ musicians and songwriters. Singer/songwriter Andra Day revealed the nominees in the four major General Field categories (Best New Artist, Record Of The Year, Song Of The Year, and Album Of The Year) live on “CBS This Morning.”

Among those four, out queer songwriter – and GLAAD board member – Justin Tranter received a songwriting nomination in the Song of the Year category for his work with good friend (and LGBTQ ally) Julia Michaels on her mega-hit “Issues.” Michaels was also nominated for Best New Artist.

The Best Pop Solo Performance category will be one to watch this year, with bisexual artists Kesha and Lady Gaga both nominated, for “Praying” and “Million Reasons,” respectively. Kelly Clarkson, P!nk, and Ed Sheeran round out this category for “Love So Soft,” “What About Us,” and “Shape of You,” respectively.

“It is exciting to see groundbreaking LGBTQ artists like Lady Gaga, Kesha, Justin Tranter, Kehlani, and Shane McAnally recognized on the music industry’s largest stage. They represent so many talented LGBTQ music artists who don’t receive the same recognition despite critical acclaim and widespread popularity,” said Sarah Kate Ellis, President and CEO of GLAAD. “As more and more artists and writers step forward and reflect the diverse identities and orientations of society, it’s important that the Recording Academy and the industry at large step up their game to recognize all worthy talent and performances.”

Kehlani, who is “very openly queer” as she told MTV and who has had relationships with both men and women, was nominated for Best R&B Performance for “Distraction.”

In the Best Country Song category, out songwriter Shane McAnally was nominated twice – once for Sam Hunt’s “Body Like A Back Road” and again for “Drinkin’ Problem,” performed by Midland. “Body Like A Back Road” has become one of the most successful country songs of all time, breaking a number of records in its historic chart run.

Jay-Z was nominated in the Album of the Year category for “4:44”; his mother, Gloria Carter, came out as a lesbian on the album’s third track, “Smile.” LGBTQ ally Lorde was nominated in Album of the Year for her album “Melodrama,” which features a track (“Liability”) about same-sex love.

LGBTQ advocates Imagine Dragons were nominated for Best Pop Duo/Group Performance for “Thunder,” where they’ll compete against ally Alessia Cara for her featured work on the Zedd track, “Stay.” In the Best Pop Vocal Album category their new album, “Evolve,” will compete against Kesha’s “Rainbow” and Gaga’s “Joanne.”

The late Carrie Fisher received a posthumous nomination for Best Spoken Word Album for “The Princess Diarist.” Fisher presented the Vanguard Award to her stepmother Elizabeth Taylor at the 11th Annual GLAAD Media Awards in 2000 in Los Angeles.

In the Best Musical Theater Album category out songwriter Benj Pasek was nominated both as a producer and composer/lyricist along his ally songwriter partner, Justin Paul, for their work on “Dear Evan Hanson.” They’ll compete in that category alongside longtime gay icon and ally Bette Midler, for her performance as a principal soloist in the revival of “Hello, Dolly!”

Pasek and Paul were also nominated for the song “City of Stars,” from the soundtrack to the film “La La Land,” in the Best Song Written For Visual Media category. They’ll compete against queer singer Sia, who’s nominated for “Never Give Up” from the film “Lion.” Out credited music supervisor Steven Gizicki was also nominated for his work on “La La Land’s” soundtrack.

The 60th Annual Grammy Awards will air live on CBS on Sunday, January 28th at 8pm ET / 5pm PT from Madison Square Garden in New York City (the first time since 2003, that the Grammys have taken place outside of Los Angeles). This year’s ceremony will be hosted for the second year in a row by James Corden.

For a full list of nominees, head to Grammy.com.

November 28, 2017
Issues: 

www.glaad.org/blog/lady-gaga-kesha-justin-tranter-shane-mcanally-among-lgbtq-inclusive-grammy-nominees

‘Will & Grace’ Goes Back in Time for a ‘Gay Olde Christmas’ – SNEAK PEEK

‘Will & Grace’ Goes Back in Time for a ‘Gay Olde Christmas’ – SNEAK PEEK

Will & Grace has a special Christmas episode coming down the chimney on December 5 and just released a preview clip of the show in which the cast goes back in time for a “gay olde Christmas.”

Wrote Megan Mullally of the clip: “this is some crazy shizz #willandgrace holiday episode #GayOldeChristmas airs December 5th #9pm@nbc in which my boobs look like they are a 46GGG, BUT I SWEAR TO GOD THEY’RE NOT ?

Watch:

The post ‘Will & Grace’ Goes Back in Time for a ‘Gay Olde Christmas’ – SNEAK PEEK appeared first on Towleroad.


‘Will & Grace’ Goes Back in Time for a ‘Gay Olde Christmas’ – SNEAK PEEK

But Teachers And Schools Can Bring It Together

But Teachers And Schools Can Bring It Together
‘Britain is in the grip of a self-reinforcing spiral of ever growing-division’. So said Alan Milburn, Chair of the Social Mobility Commission, who chose not to mince his words when talking about the state of social mobility in 2017.

In its State of the Nation report the Commission found a growing divide between London and the rest of the country, leading to a deeply divided nation.

Places like Tower Hamlets and Hackney in the capital are still home to some of the highest levels of poverty in the country. But the transformation of education along with the opportunities available in the capital work together to exert a ‘push’ and a ‘pull’ on achievement. As a result disadvantaged young people in London are now more likely to get good grades, go to university or get a better paid job.

It is not inner cities, but rural and coastal towns and former industrial communities that are the new social mobility cold spots. It is now in places like Carlisle, Corby and Weymouth where children born into poverty have the least chances of escaping it.

Ignoring this geographical disparity will only lead to an increasingly divided society, with the serious consequences for cohesion that entails. Alan Milburn highlighted that of the 65 ‘social mobility cold spots’ his Commission identified, all but five voted ‘leave’ in the EU referendum. They haven’t felt the benefits of some of our national projects. The geographical inequality of opportunity, he said, helps explain an increasingly polarised politics and the feeling of many those that live in these communities that they have been ‘left behind’.

But the Commission did identify the steps we can take to improve the chances of young people in these social mobility cold spots. In particular, on the ‘push’ side of the equation, they highlighted the importance of getting great teachers into the schools that need them the most. As a charity that recruits and trains teachers to work in these communities, we couldn’t agree more. Schools do not stand alone in tackling disadvantage, but they can have a transformative effect on their communities.

We need more people to come forward and take on the challenge of a career in teaching and, most importantly, we need them to work and stay in the communities that need them most.

Over the last few years Teach First have placed and retained more and more teachers into coastal and rural areas as the social mobility challenges of Britain have changed.

We started 15 years ago as a charity recruiting and training teachers to work in some of the most deprived inner-London schools. But over the last decade, we have placed thousands of teachers in schools serving low-income communities in places like Hastings, Bradford and Blackpool – all areas today highlighted as social mobility cold spots.

From being ‘on the front line’ we have learnt what a lack of social mobility really means for children in these areas. It’s not that the poverty in these areas is necessarily more severe, but that young people lack the wider opportunities – the ‘pull’ factor – to reach their full potential and rise out of this poverty. They lack the industry, businesses, transport and infrastructure on their doorstep.

One thing our teachers always tell us is that these children absolutely do not lack ambition. They have the same dreams and aspirations as children in the most affluent and socially mobile areas. What they lack is the opportunity to realise those ambitions.

So we support the Commission’s recommendations that government, councils, schools and businesses redouble their efforts to tackle this problem and ensure all young people – wherever they are born – get a fair chance in life.

This means we need to support them with things like careers advice, work experience and access to higher-education, so they can navigate the world of work and gain the skills they will need in the future. But most of all, it means we need to get even more brilliant individuals into the teaching profession and into the schools that need them the most.

Teaching is one of the most rewarding careers out there. Very few other professions allow you to directly have such a transformative impact on the lives of young people. I’d encourage anyone – whether you’re looking for a graduate job or thinking about a change in career – to take up the challenge of teaching.

Russell Hobby is Chief Executive of education charity Teach First

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/social-mobility_uk_5a1d8e66e4b079c1128a1655

3 Easy Ways to Support HRC for Giving Tuesday

3 Easy Ways to Support HRC for Giving Tuesday

We wanted to share 3 easy ways that you can promote HRC for Giving Tuesday, a global day that encourages giving back to your community.

  1. Facebook Fundraisers: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has teamed up with Facebook and agreed to match Facebook Fundraisers up to $50,000. In a couple of clicks, you can set up a Facebook Fundraiser for HRC and encourage your friends to donate in support of LGBTQ equality. 
    Head to: www.facebook.com/pg/humanrightscampaign/fundraisers/ 

    • Click “+Raise Money” to get started
    • Select Human Rights Campaign, how much you want to raise and your deadline
    • Title your fundraiser and tell your story on why you’re raising money to help protect and defend LGBTQ rights
    • Pick a cover photo (or select HRC’s current one)
    • Hit Create! You’re all set.
  2. West Elm 100% Giveback: HRC and West Elm recently expanded on our popular “Love is Love” mug, with a holiday line that includes a candletrinket dishdinnerware, and holiday ornament. Normally, 50% of these proceeds come back to HRC — but tomorrow only, West Elm will be committing 100% of the proceeds back to HRC. You (and everyone you know!) can shop the collection here.
  3. Matching Opportunity: Promote our donor matching opportunity on your social networks. For every gift of $10 or more, a $100 gift will be made by an anonymous donor to HRC. hrc.im/GivingTuesday
 

www.hrc.org/blog/3-easy-ways-to-support-hrc-for-giving-tuesday?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

GLAAD and 45 national, state and local organizations call on the press to reject adopting anti-LGBTQ talking points while covering the Masterpiece Cakeshop case

GLAAD and 45 national, state and local organizations call on the press to reject adopting anti-LGBTQ talking points while covering the Masterpiece Cakeshop case

November 28, 2017

On December 5, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will hear oral arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission – a case about a person’s right to cite religious beliefs to gain exemption from existing laws and deny service to a fellow American.

Referring to the matter at the center of this case as religious freedom or religious liberty is deceptive and factually inaccurate branding started by anti-LGBTQ organizations and political strategists to obfuscate the actual harm that can and will be done to LGBTQ and other marginalized people under these exemptions. This is not a neutral framing of this debate, but is language that is driven by some of the most fringe and anti-LGBTQ organizations in the United States including Family Research Council, Mass Resistance, and Liberty Council. In contrast, the term religious exemptions is factually accurate and neutral. It does not take a particular side in this issue, and does not adopt the language of organizations squarely against LGBTQ rights.

GLAAD and the below signed organizations are writing to you today to ask that you use the more accurate terminology of religious exemptions for your readers, viewers, and listeners moving forward.

Our religious freedom and religious liberty values are already – and must continue to be – protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Religious exemption laws and court cases allow business owners to impose their religious beliefs on their employees, their customers, their patients, their constituents, and others. As a result, religious exemptions have in many cases become a vehicle for harming others or refusing to follow any number of laws that individuals and/or companies claim interfere with their religious beliefs – including nondiscrimination laws, healthcare laws, and even laws that protect public safety and prevent abuse.

Since 2016 alone, more than 135 anti-LGBTQ bills involving religious exemptions were introduced in statehouses around the United States, with only a handful becoming law. These bills have been introduced even as a majority of Americans have said, according to a poll conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI), that they are opposed to policy makers using these bills to harm others.

Under religious exemption laws, a business owner can deny women reproductive health care services, reject a person of color’s housing or employment application, or refuse to give medical care to a child of two lesbian women.

With the upcoming Supreme Court case and an administration that prioritizes religious exemptions alongside groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a SPLC-designated hate group representing Masterpiece Cakeshop, now is the time to ask the nation’s media to use accurate phrasing instead of a misnomer aimed at miseducation. To do this, media should use religious exemptions to describe the upcoming Supreme Court case and related bills being considered around the country.

This is serious, and it is about more than a cake. It is about broad discrimination and the harms it could cause. The Masterpiece case will set the precedent for any debates on religious exemptions for generations to come for the United States, and it is vital the public understands what is at stake. Every story and interview by the media on this topic could shape minds and sway public majority behind protecting all Americans – not just a special and exempt few. Only the media can bring the full scope with what’s at stake for this nation if the U.S. Supreme Court were to let fringe influences dictate how we treat one another in this country.

We urge you to demonstrate responsibility in reporting and coverage by educating your audience that the SCOTUS case and related laws are about promoting religious exemptions for one American at the expense of many others.

The below organizations will be making a public call for mainstream media to report this issue with accuracy and fairness. That public call will continue as new stories are published. We would welcome the opportunity to speak with you and your editorial team on this matter.

Thank you,

GLAAD
Ad’ullam Church
Advocates for Youth
Alaskans Together For Equality
Basic Rights Oregon
Cathedral of Hope United Church of Christ
CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers
Color of Change
Equality Alabama
Equality Arizona
Equality California
Equality Federation
Equality Federation
Equality Florida
Equality New Mexico
Equality North Carolina
Equality Pennsylvania
Equality South Dakota
Equality Texas
Equality Virginia
Equality Maine
Family Equality Council
FORGE, Inc.
FreeState Justice
Georgia Equality
Keep Birth Control Copay Free
Mazzoni Center
Ms. Foundation for Women
National Black Justice Coalition
National Center for Lesbian Rights
National Center for Transgender Equality
National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs
National LGBTQ Task Force
One Colorado
OutFront Minnesota
Pillars Fund
Planned Parenthood
PROMO Missouri
Purpose
Southern Arizona Gender Alliance, Inc.
The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Community Center
The Trevor Project
Transgender Law Center
Whitman-Walker Health
Women’s Equality Center

November 28, 2017

www.glaad.org/blog/glaad-and-45-national-state-and-local-organizations-call-press-reject-adopting-anti-lgbtq

Navajo Nation Blasts Trump for ‘Offensive and Dangerous’ Pocahontas Crack

Navajo Nation Blasts Trump for ‘Offensive and Dangerous’ Pocahontas Crack

Navajo Nation Delegate Amber Kanazbah Crotty released a statement late last night blasting Donald Trump’s racist crack at Elizabeth Warren during a ceremony honoring Navajo Code Talkers at the White House yesterday.

During the ceremony, Trump was standing in front of a portrait of Andrew Jackson, who signed the Indian Removal Act.

Said Trump:

“You were here long before any of us were here. Although we have a representative in Congress who they say was here a long time ago. They call her Pocahontas. But you know what? I like YOU. Because you are special.”

Said Crotty in the statement:

“Today’s careless comment from President Trump is the latest example of systemic, deep-seated ignorance of Native Americans and our intrinsic right to exist and practice our ways of life. The intentional disregard of the historical trauma of Pocahontas as a sexual assault survivor directly resulting from colonization is disturbing.

“The Navajo People are not strangers to the prejudice, discrimination, and marginalization perpetrated by western culture. Our woman and children are targets of violence. We must speak out against such ignorance in every instance, in hopes for a better future for our children and our land.

“I must respond to White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ flat-out denial of this racial slur, dismissing the tangible and egregious impact pejoratives have on Indigenous people. I must respond to President Trump’s remark today referencing Pocahontas. With due respect, it is problematic for the president to use this term in the manner we heard today. It diminishes the experience of Pocahontas and is totally inappropriate. The reckless appropriation of this term is deeply offensive and dangerous to the sovereignty and identity of our peoples. Such rhetoric is damaging, and it a serious infringement of our right to live as Native Americans.

“The Navajo Code Talkers are not pawns to advance a personal grudge, or promote false narratives. Such pandering dishonors the sacrifice of our national heroes. Let me be clear, such antics do not change the fact of history. Indigenous peoples’ disparate socioeconomic issues are a direct result of this false narrative, and we cannot sit idly by as the citizens of the United States and our Indigenous children are gas-lighted from this terrible truth.

“We honor and respect the Navajo Code Talkers, and we are proud of their sacrifice. Let us not allow this display of immaturity and short-sightedness distract us from the important issues we advocate for collectively as sovereign nations on this continent, but continue to advance the cause and secure the future of Indigenous people in America.”

Navajo Nation response to Trump’s insult:
“The Navajo Code Talkers are not pawns to advance a personal grudge…” pic.twitter.com/3KFxlIYOoT

— Ruth H. Hopkins (@RuthHHopkins) November 28, 2017

The post Navajo Nation Blasts Trump for ‘Offensive and Dangerous’ Pocahontas Crack appeared first on Towleroad.


Navajo Nation Blasts Trump for ‘Offensive and Dangerous’ Pocahontas Crack