U.S. Congress Unanimously Condemns Anti-LGBTQ Violence In Chechnya While Donald Trump Remains Silent

U.S. Congress Unanimously Condemns Anti-LGBTQ Violence In Chechnya While Donald Trump Remains Silent

Today, HRC hailed the U.S. Senate’s passage of a resolution condemning the violence and persecution against LGBTQ people in Chechnya. Last night, the Senate adopted the resolution by voice vote. The U.S. House of Representatives unanimously passed a nearly identical bipartisan resolution in June. To date, neither President Trump nor U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson have publicly condemned the atrocities.

“With unanimous passage of this resolution, the U.S. Senate just sent a powerful message. Despite the deafening silence from the White House, the people of the United States strongly condemn these anti-LGBTQ attacks in Chechnya,” said Ty Cobb, director of HRC Global. “Members of both parties in both chambers have now condemned the anti-LGBTQ Chechen violence and persecution, and it’s far past time that President Trump and Secretary Tillerson also publicly do so. Given the growing violence and arrests of LGBTQ people around the world, the United States must not back away from leading on LGBTQ human rights.”

The bipartisan Senate Resolution (S. Res.) 211, which was introduced by Senators Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Ed Markey (D-MA), is nearly identical to the U.S. House of Representatives resolution unanimously passed in June.  Like the House version, S. Res. 211 “calls on Chechen officials to immediately cease the abduction, detention, and torture of individuals on the basis of their actual or suspected sexual orientation, and hold accountable all those involved in perpetrating such abuses.” It also calls on the U.S. government to “continue to condemn the violence and persecution in Chechnya,” something that President Trump and Secretary Tillerson have failed to do publicly. Only a small number of Trump Administration officials have publicly spoken out, such as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley.

Since early this year, Chechen authorities have rounded up and detained more than 100 men in secret prisons, under suspicion that they are gay or bisexual. Chechen leaders have denied these accusations, going so far as to deny the very existence of LGBTQ people in Chechnya. Nonetheless, there have been numerous verified reports of torture and at least three and possibly as many as 20 men have been killed. Chechen officials have also reportedly encouraged families to murder relatives they suspect might be gay, something that at least one family seems to have acted on. While the initial detentions and attacks targeted suspected gay and bisexual men, the campaign has also brought about a surge in lesbian women sharing stories about humiliation, abuse, and threats they have faced from male relatives or from others. Transgender Chechens have also fled violence.

President Trump and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson have thus far failed to publicly condemn the attacks. In September, a Washington Post article quoted a State Department spokesperson who said “the United States will ‘continue to raise our concerns about this situation with Russian authorities’ and that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had written a letter to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov about it.” That letter was never released publicly nor was it accompanied by any public statement on Chechnya. Earlier this month, HRC filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the U.S. Department of State for all records regarding that letter.

www.hrc.org/blog/the-us-congress-unanimously-condemns-anti-lgbtq-violence-in-chechnya-trump?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

Trump Watched Manafort Turn Himself in on TV with ‘Exasperation’ and ‘Disgust’ – REPORT

Trump Watched Manafort Turn Himself in on TV with ‘Exasperation’ and ‘Disgust’ – REPORT

Donald Trump watched his former campaign manager Paul Manafort turn himself in to the FBI live on cable news Monday morning, according to the Washington Post:

Trump clicked on the television and spent the morning playing fuming media critic, legal analyst and crisis communications strategist, according to several people close to him.

The president digested the news of the first indictments in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe with exasperation and disgust, these people said. He called his lawyers repeatedly. He listened intently to cable news commentary. And, with rising irritation, he watched live footage of his onetime campaign adviser and confidant, Paul Manafort, turning himself in to the FBI.

The paper adds:

On Capitol Hill, meanwhile, some of Trump’s allies are privately revving up their own version of a counterattack against Mueller. Several top Republican legislators plan to raise questions in the coming days about the FBI’s handling of a “dossier” detailing alleged ties between Trump and Russian interests. They intend to argue that Mueller’s team has become overly reliant on a document that was funded in part by Democrats, according to two people involved in the discussions. Mueller does not appear to have relied on the dossier for the cases revealed on Monday, however.

The post Trump Watched Manafort Turn Himself in on TV with ‘Exasperation’ and ‘Disgust’ – REPORT appeared first on Towleroad.


Trump Watched Manafort Turn Himself in on TV with ‘Exasperation’ and ‘Disgust’ – REPORT

A Video Pioneer: How Lovefilm Blazed aATrail

A Video Pioneer: How Lovefilm Blazed aATrail
It’s been a story as chequered as any in the TV and movie library that it carried. Lovefilm, the little British upstart that pioneered DVD rentals, finally shuts down after many consumers made the move to streaming services.

As the ending credits roll after 15 years, it is worth remembering that the Lovefilm story was one of constant agile adaptation to the prevailing media economy – and its legacy lives on inside the new-look video landscape.

An acquisitional history

For one, Lovefilm was the product of the roll-up of several early rivals. The original, DVDsOnTop, launched in 2002, but rebranded as Lovefilm a year later after its acquisition by Arts Alliance Ventures. In 2004, rival ScreenSelect accelerated the consolidation of the emerging sector, acquiring In-Movies, Video Island and DVDs365, while Lovefilm snapped up Webflix and the online business of retailer Choices. By 2006, ScreenSelect and Lovefilm themselves merged.

This was a wave of pioneers. Where, now, Lovefilm has given way to streaming operators like Netflix, at the time, it was disrupting established leaders like Blockbuster, the main source of DVD rentals, with a home delivery service – Royal Mail delivering movies before broadband had gone mass-market.

It’s not that Lovefilm didn’t transition to digital early. By the end of 2008/09, online was its primary business. But its own acquisition of Amazon’s nascent DVD rental business in 2008 solidified the trajectory that was emerging. Whilst, to many observers, it looked like a reverse takeover, Amazon became Lovefilm’s largest shareholder.

The digital transformation

That ownership gave both sides the focus and power needed to reboot DVD rental as video subscription. It is easy to forget it now but, at the time, Lovefilm’s online repertoire was disappointingly small; studios were reluctant to license their movies to digital players. But Amazon’s heft gave Lovefilm wings. When Amazon fully acquired Lovefilm in 2011, it soared in digital. Amazon had always intended to use Lovefilm as its vehicle into video-on-demand and, three years later, folded Lovefilm’s digital offering into its new Amazon Instant Video, retaining the name Lovefilm By Post for DVDs. It is that branch that is now ceasing activity.

Living to stream another day

Lovefilm’s demise is not a negative outcome that stems from being left behind – rather, it is a victory for the many entrepreneurs and investors who contributed to building the future of media delivery, and who carefully and deliberately made a migration that took years. It is the next logical step in the evolution of video content within our digital lives.

I suggest the next wave of media transformation comes not in the delivery, but in the package, which is currently being tested. We are now close to having as much instant access to and delivery of video as we could ever hope for – more, in fact, than there is time for. Three hundred videos are uploaded to YouTube every minute.

The growth in content choices and the trend towards consumption are forcing the containers of content to change.

Overall daily time spent watching UK TV on traditional platforms has been declining since 2011. Even the once-dependable TV fare of live sports is waning, with 2016/17 English Premier League audiences down 22% from the 2010/11 season.

But consumption via mobile is booming. Since mobile consumption tends to occur in the fleeting moments in transit from one activity to another – on the train platform, waiting in the queue – it compels content to be shorter, snappier and more compelling.

Taking a bite out of content

We have heard about “snackable” content strategies for years. The Lovefilms of the future should now be investing in reinventing content in a shorter, more attention-grabbing format.

A recent study of ours recently found that shorter videos gained more views and with only 1% of all social video content actually going viral, many companies are already trying their hand at becoming part of the one percenters. The bigger players are waking up to this trend as NBCUniversal and Snap, owner of the Snapchat app, which is famed for hosting videos of just 10 seconds long, just formed a studio together, dedicated to producing short-form comedies and drama for mobile screens.

Undeniably, in tandem with the explosion in video content consumption online, attention spans have dwindled significantly in response. If we fast forward to a decade from now, this is likely to be even more pronounced than now. By 2027, we’re likely to see all long form content adapted significantly towards creating additional shorter, digestible content for consumers.

As evidenced by the closure of Lovefilm, consumption trends can change as quickly as they came along, getting ahead of the curve is critical to survive.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dror-ginzberg/a-video-pioneer-how-lovef_b_18420134.html

How Do You Deal With Secondary Infertility?

How Do You Deal With Secondary Infertility?
I had a milestone birthday in October, I turned 40 and alongside the many hopes and dreams that I had for this age, having a family was an integral part of what I imagined. I have spent the last year hoping and trying to be pregnant with our second child, by the time I reached 40. Yes, you read that right, second child!

You see, our route to becoming parents the first time around wasn’t straightforward. We went through IVF to conceive our son after years of trying to get pregnant naturally. Finding out you need science to intervene to have a baby is a blow, and I’ll never forget the consultant telling us that we would need to go down the IVF route on 23rd December 2013. Christmas was awful. We were completely overwhelmed and felt utterly hopeless. However, we were one of the ‘success stories’ it worked for us and we now have a beautiful 2.5 year old son. I felt so lucky that our journey had been straight forward and decided to immerse myself in the fertility world completely. In September 2014 I launched The Fertility Podcast.

106 episodes later, I publish an interview every Monday either with a fertility expert or someone I’ve met online, happy to share their personal fertility struggles. I’m constantly humbled by the determination we have to start or complete our families. Search infertility on social media and you’ll see thousands of profiles of people sharing their struggles, listing the treatments they’ve had, sharing advice. One in six couples struggle to conceive, so I shouldn’t be surprised at how many people talk about it online, but I constantly am. My podcast aims to help people share their story. From those still trying, to those who have come to terms with living their lives childless, I admire their resilience and acceptance of what their future holds. This week is National Fertility Awareness Week in the UK, so you can expect to hear more stories both positive and negative about people unable to start their family the way we all expected.

I want to talk about secondary infertility, because we don’t, and we should. To be clear, secondary infertility is if you’ve had a child, miscarriage or still birth and then you try again and have problems. I feel bad as I know how blessed we are to even have one child, especially as I’m talking about it with people all the time. However, we still don’t realise how long lasting the effects of infertility are. Put it this way, if you had to have fertility treatment to conceive your first child, the odds are that this will be route you need to take for the second.

I know I’m not at all unique in the guilt that I feel about all of this. Most women who have had a child through fertility treatment experience the frustration and sadness and feelings of inadequacy that I do. We are therefore a silent tribe who still have to manage the sadness felt each time a pal shares they’re expecting their second or third child, or it’s a new mum friend asking whether I’m planning any more children. It’s only a matter of time before my two and half year old starts to ask about a sister or brother. We are trying to be realistic and have a plan B – to have a frozen embryo transfer in the new year. I’m just terrified if that doesn’t work what do we do next? I don’t think I can go through another cycle of fertility treatment, plus we would struggle to afford it as we’re saving for a house. We have important life changing decisions to make.

I have spoken to numerous people talking about failed cycles, people who have decided to stop. I have watched more and more CCG’s stop funding IVF treatment. The right to try to have a family is extremely misunderstood by many. Nobody wants to walk through the doors of a fertility clinic through choice. For many, the reality of starting a family is not only a huge emotional burden but also can be financially crippling.

We grow up assuming having a family is a ‘given’ and when it doesn’t happen as you expect it’s a difficult reality to accept. I’m coming to terms with what might be and pull my son in even tighter for a hug at every opportunity. I’ll continue working part time to spend as much time with him as possible even if it means my savings pot takes longer to fill. I feel guilty that he might be an only child so I will make sure we have an open house for all his friends, that it’s filled with laughter and our family grows in a different way.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/natalie-silverman/how-do-you-deal-with-seco_b_18420302.html

Kim: “퀴어옵서예!” 첫 제주퀴어문화축제의 순간들

Kim: “퀴어옵서예!” 첫 제주퀴어문화축제의 순간들
제주도가 무지개로 물들었습니다. 지난 10월 28일 토요일, 제주시 신산공원 일대에서 제주 퀴어문화축제가 열렸습니다. “퀴어옵서예!”라는 슬로건으로 개최된 이번 축제에서는 주최측 약 500명이 공원에 방문해 행사를 즐기고, 1000여명이 퍼레이드에 참가해 즐겁고도 힘차게 걸었습니다.

기사 보기: 동성애, 보이스, 제주, 제주 LGBT, 성소수자, 양성애, LGBT 퍼레이드, Korea News

www.huffingtonpost.kr/minsu-kim/story_b_18425394.html

Mark Carney Warned: Raising Interest Rates Will Hurt Struggling Homeowners The Most

Mark Carney Warned: Raising Interest Rates Will Hurt Struggling Homeowners The Most
Homeowners struggling to make ends meet will be even worse off if the Bank of England hikes interest rates this week, a financial charity has warned.

The Money Charity is concerned that even a slight rise in interest rates from their historic low of 0.25% could have severe implications for those struggling to balance mortgage repayments and personal debt.

While a modest rise of 0.25% could see mortgages increase by around £30 a month for some homeowners, those living in tight financial constraints may be forced to cut back on credit card or loan repayments to keep up payments to the bank.

That could lead to personal debt – which has a far greater interest rate than mortgages – soaring.

Another debt charity, Step Change, urged against overstating the impact of a small rate rise, but admitted that for those “living on the edge” it could have a serious impact.

Interest rates have not risen since July 2007, and were slashed to the then-historic low of 0.5% in March 2009 as a way of coping with the financial crash which had occurred just six months earlier.

But with inflation hitting 3% – and likely to increase – Bank of England Governor Mark Carney warned MPs last week a rate hike was likely in the “coming months.”

The group of nine economists who decide the base rate – the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee – will announce on Thursday November 2 if rates will increase.

Speaking to HuffPost UK, The Money Charity’s Luke Humphrey said: “We are concerned the interest rise is going to hit people who are the worst off and make them even worse off.”

Referring to people with variable rate mortgages and personal loans, Humphrey said: “Somebody with both will have to prioritise between the two. That can lead to mortgages going in arrears and loans not being paid off. People who are juggling a lot of debt are going to find it a struggle.”

Which mortgages are affected by a rise in the interest rates? Tracker rate: These are a fixed percentage either above, or sometimes, below, a certain rate – usually the base rate. When the Bank of England raises interest rates, these rise. Standard variable rate: Similar to tracker mortgages, but these give the bank much greater flexibility to alter the interest rate on a loan outside of Bank of England decisions. However, an increase in the base rate is more than likely to be echoed in these mortgages. Fixed rate: It might seem that fixed rate mortgages aren’t affected by a rise in interest rates, but seeing as the locked-in rate only lasts a certain number of years, when a homeowner moves to a standard variable they will be impacted by the Bank of England’s decision. Someone with two years left of their fixed rate deal might have been rubbing their hands with glee at interest rates of 0.25%. However, if the Bank of England pushes on with greater interest rate rises, they could be looking at 2-3% by 2019. According to the Bank of England, 43% of homeowners are on tracker or variable rate mortgages – meaning they would be affected by any base rate rise.
Research by The Money Charity reveals just how precarious the finances of many in the UK are – with personal debt increasing.

Some £1.554 trillion was owed at the end of August 2017 – up from £1.5 trillion at the end of July 2016. This works out an extra £1,029.82 per UK adult.

Consumer credit debt per household stands stood at £7,492 in August, up from a revised £7,434 in July – and £538.78 extra per household over the year.

The increase in consumer credit debt comes as once again real wages lag behind what increases would be needed to keep up with inflation.

Figures released by the Office for National Statistics shows wages are once again falling in real terms – a trend which the UK looked to have dealt with in 2014/15.

Despite wages stagnating and consumer debt increasing, the Bank of England is considering raising interest rates this week for the first time since July 5 2007.

One reason is the drop in the value of the pound since the EU referendum.

Sterling is about 18% below its value in November 2015, with much of its fall taking place after June 2016. While that is good news for exporters, it has meant higher prices on imported goods, which has seen inflation increase.

One way to get inflation down is to make it more expensive to borrow money and encourage people to save more – two boxes ticked by increasing interest rates.

But such a move is not without its risks. Trying to get people to put less on the credit card would have an impact on the UK’s economic output, with consumer spending already being squeezed.

As the Bank of England’s August inflation report notes: “Output growth slowed in the first half of 2017. Much of that slowing appears to have been driven by weaker growth in household spending, as sterling’s depreciation weighed on real income growth.”

While some may see an interest rate rise as a sign not to upgrade their car or buy a new piece of furniture on credit, others will be forced to reexamine how they service their existing debts

Peter Tutton, head of policy at Step Change, believes any rise in interest rates will be slow enough to allow the majority of people to get their finances in order to cope with increase outgoings.

He told HuffPost UK: “Quite a lot will be on fixed rate deals, and they have time to try to adapt to any increase.”

Yet like The Money Charity, Tutton did sound a note of caution for those with little slack in their personal finances.

He said: “You have a lot of households experiencing negative real income. There’s the public sector pay freeze, the benefit freeze.

“Will a rate rise hurt some households? A relatively small number? Will it push them over the edge but could they recover with the right help? Yes.”

Before the Bank…

Handing the power to set interest rates to the Bank of England was one of the key policies of New Labour in its bid to be seen as economically responsible.

Prior to the Bank deciding what the rate should be, it was the Treasury who would set the base rate.

With politicians rather than economists having the final say, the base rate level could be used to firm up a Government policy instead of squarely as a tool for economic stability.

Nowhere was this more obvious on 16 September 1992, a day known as Black Wednesday. Tory Chancellor Norman Lamont was so desperate to keep the UK in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) – a tool designed to stop huge fluctuations between difference currencies – that he raised interest rates from 10% to 12% and then to 15% all on the same day.

He also authorised the spending of billions of pounds worth of foreign currency reserves to buy up the sterling which being frantically sold on the international markets in a bit to stop the pound crashing out of ERM by falling below the lowest level allowed.

While Lamont may have had his eye on international economics, homeowners across the country looked on aghast as they saw their mortgage rates shoot up throughout the day.

Ian Cannell, now 65, remembers well the panic as the base rate kept growing and growing.

Then 40 years old, Cannell worked at Cambridge University and was the father of two children still at school.

“We were mortgaged up to the hilt,” he said, reflecting how even with his wife working part-time there wasn’t a lot of spare money around.

“The whole thing seemed to be out of control, our leaders didn’t seem to have an idea about what to do,” he added.

The Tories’ reputation for economic competence took decades to recover, and despite winning an election less than six months earlier Prime Minister John Major found himself behind Labour in the opinion polls.

When Gordon Brown became Chancellor in 1997 following Labour’s landslide, he handed responsibility for rate setting over to the Bank of England to avoid the interest rate being used as a political football again.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/mark-carney-interest-rate-rise_uk_59f7a097e4b0aec1467a446e