Restaurant Caught Red-Handed Denying Entrance to Gay Couple on ‘Date Night’ – WATCH

Restaurant Caught Red-Handed Denying Entrance to Gay Couple on ‘Date Night’ – WATCH

date night

A restaurant near Johannesburg, South Africa was caught discriminating this week when it forbid Eyewitness News journalists Clement Manyathela and Victor Magwedze, who were posing as a gay couple, from sitting down at the restaurant’s date night.

News24 reports:

In an SMS, which is sent out once a booking has been made for “date night”, the restaurant stipulates that same-sex couples are not welcome…

…On Monday, restaurant owner Sami-Jo Amiras told News24: “Date night is a themed event designed for a man and a woman.

“The reason for stating ‘no same-sex couple’ is not meant to discriminate against anyone, but to control a couple’s event.”

The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is looking into the matter. Spokesperson Gushwell Brooks said the equality clause of the Constitution stated clearly that discrimination based on sexual orientation was unacceptable.

“There are numerous establishments that still refuse entry or services to people based on their sexual orientation and that this is obviously in breach of our right to equality,” he said.

Watch:

The post Restaurant Caught Red-Handed Denying Entrance to Gay Couple on ‘Date Night’ – WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Restaurant Caught Red-Handed Denying Entrance to Gay Couple on ‘Date Night’ – WATCH

HRC Previews Anti-LGBTQ Action Anticipated in Statehouses During 2017

HRC Previews Anti-LGBTQ Action Anticipated in Statehouses During 2017

Today, HRC released a new report previewing battles against anti-LGBTQ state legislation expected in the year ahead. With at least 40 anti-LGBTQ bills in 16 states introduced so far, HRC anticipates that, as in 2016, anti-equality activists will push for legislation giving a license to discriminate against LGBTQ people under the guise of religion; measures specifically targeting transgender people; and proposals to eliminate local LGBTQ non-discrimination protections, among others. The new analysis also highlights opportunities to advance LGBTQ equality in 2017.  

“Lawmakers seeking to target LGBTQ people would do well to heed the lessons learned in North Carolina, where legislators are still working to repeal HB2 and undo the damage wrought by that hateful law,” said HRC President Chad Griffin. “Like last year, we will be working closely with state partners across the country to prevent lawmakers from plowing down a destructive path that threatens LGBTQ people and wrecks a state’s economy and reputation. It’s time to recognize that Americans have moved inexorably in the direction of equality and there is no appetite for anti-LGBTQ politicking.”

In recent years, the steady increase in public support for LGBTQ equality has been met with a wave of anti-LGBTQ legislation being introduced in state legislatures. As lawmakers begin new sessions in state capitols around the country, HRC is bracing for a repeat of the 2015 and 2016 sessions, with hundreds of anti-LGBTQ bills filed. In 2016, legislators in 38 states filed more than 250 bills meant to restrict the rights of LGBTQ individuals and their families. With hard work, collective cooperation, and tight focus throughout the state and national LGBTQ equality movement, only 8 of those bills passed both legislative chambers, and after gubernatorial vetoes, just 5 bills actually became law. However, with the 2016 election results, 2017 has the potential to be even more challenging. As the 2017 legislative sessions begin, more states will have Republican single-party control in the House, Senate, and Governor’s office than in the previous legislative period.

The discriminatory legislation targeting LGBTQ people is taking many different forms across the country. They range from measures specifically targeting transgender people and seeking to prevent them from accessing sex-segregated facilities consistent with their gender identity; legislation aimed to authorize individuals, businesses, and taxpayer-funded agencies to cite religion as an excuse to refuse goods or services to LGBTQ people; and bills seeking to eliminate the ability of local governments to protect LGBTQ residents and visitors from discrimination, among other proposals.

Continued Southern Focus

Most of the anti-LGBTQ legislation considered in 2016 was introduced in southern states, and 2017 is expected to be the same with significant concerns being raised in Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia. In fact, in these and other states, more than three dozen bills are already on the docket for consideration, and there is no doubt there will be more as the legislative sessions progress.

Advocates are especially concerned with the threats posed by lawmakers in the Lone Star State. It is clear the Texas Legislature expects to take up religious refusal bills, anti-transgender legislation, and other discriminatory proposals. It will take the full force of the LGBTQ movement, business and civic leaders, and other stakeholders to ensure Texas does not pass anti-LGBTQ laws this session.

Pro-Equality Legislation

Although the legislative environment in a majority of states will not likely be open to considering pro- equality bills, there are a few places where movement is possible. Leaders in New Hampshire and New York will continue to consider whether to add gender identity to their state non-discrimination laws. Legislators in California are expected to remain on the cutting edge of passing laws protecting LGBTQ people. In Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota and Ohio, legislators will again be presented with the opportunity to add sexual orientation and gender identity to state non-discrimination laws, while in Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico and Rhode Island, consideration could be given to laws protecting minors from incredibly harmful conversion therapy.

Ballot Initiatives

Last year marked one of the rare recent years where there was not a repeal of pro-LGBTQ state or local legislation on the ballot anywhere. Unfortunately, the future holds several challenges in attempts by anti-equality activists to undo important legislative protections for LGBTQ people.

Activists in Massachusetts have already secured enough signatures to place a repeal of the new gender identity public accommodations law on the ballot in November of 2018. Freedom Massachusetts, the campaign that includes the Human Rights Campaign and other organizations that secured the legislative victory, is already at work to protect the law when it goes to the ballot. Meanwhile, opposition forces in Washington State were unable to secure enough signatures in 2016 to take a repeal of the state’s 10-year- old non-discrimination law to the ballot, but are expected to make another attempt in 2017. And in Maine, extremists have received approval to collect signatures to place on the ballot the removal of “sexual orientation” from the state’s Human Rights Act.

After the governor’s veto of discriminatory anti-transgender student legislation in South Dakota, anti-LGBTQ forces in the state have threatened a ballot referendum if a bill similar to the one vetoed by Governor Daugaard does not pass in the 2017 legislative session.

The full report — Preview 2017: Pro-Equality and Anti-LGBTQ State and Local Legislation — can be found here.

www.hrc.org/blog/hrc-previews-anti-lgbtq-action-anticipated-in-statehouses-during-2017?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

The Trump effect: How American politics are ruining gay etiquette and making us meaner

The Trump effect: How American politics are ruining gay etiquette and making us meaner

It’s official. Like him or not, Trump is now the President of the United States of America, which means he’s a role model–and not just for people who voted for him or who live in the U.S. When he mocks a disabled reporter or trash talks women from his global stage, he’s telling the world that it’s OK to be a bully and say whatever is on your mind regardless of how it may affect others.

So what does this have to with the LGBTQ community, which generally leans toward the liberal side of things? Whether we realize it or not, the words and misdeeds of people like Trump leave their mark. You don’t have to be what the world perceives as a typical supporter to follow their example.

Related: In Trump we don’t trust: What it means to be trans in the era of DJT

When Teflon Trump waves the “politically incorrect” flag, also known as “assholery,” over and over, and we keep letting him get away with it, we’re sending a message that bad behavior won’t necessarily go unrewarded.

That message can resonate with people who voted for Hillary Clinton, and it seems to have slowly seeped into the gay community over the last several months.

Grindr has never been a bastion of subtlety or delicacy, but guys there are increasingly treating each other like mere flesh for fantasy. To too many, we’re now all merely anatomy, not even worthy of being spoken to in complete sentences. “Hung?” “Into?” “Top?” “BBC?”

Of course, size and role have always mattered on hook-up apps, but as a friend pointed out on Facebook, guys on Grindr have recently become “more severely terse.” In part, it’s the ongoing effect of the social media age. People are now free to say what’s really on their minds, show their true colors, because the internet allows them to do so anonymously. It’s also the era of instant gratification. Everybody wants their candy—and with as little effort as possible.

Related: These courageous HIV advocates will lead the way against Trump in 2017

It’s no coincidence that, as Trump rose from political joke to the 45th U.S. President, spreading his message of non-acceptance throughout the world, Grindr behavior has simultaneously become considerably cruder. Few guys, it seems, bother wasting their time on complete sentences anymore. Some don’t use words at all, only sharing a series of XXX pics in hopes of catching their prey.

I don’t think gays have gotten ruder and cruder because they’re bad people. And they’re no more horny than they were back when Trump was best known as the “You’re fired” guy on The Apprentice. But as assumes his new position behind the desk in the Oval Office, everything has changed. His spectacular success in spite of a continuous stream of social scandals has conditioned many of us to think it’s OK to ignore rules of etiquette, if questionable means lead to desirable ends. Let’s cut to the chase, throw decorum out the window. All that matters is winning the prize—a roll in the hay, the presidency.

The cause and effect isn’t as simple as Trump tweeting something outrageously indecorous and a gay guy somewhere in Middle America thinking, Oh, now I can start sending unsolicited nudie pics to hot boys on Grindr. It’s more circuitous and far-reaching than that. When irresponsible social behavior at the top goes unchecked, it fosters a global environment where sensitivity and tact are no longer social priorities. Consciously or subconsciously, we’re all affected.

Related: Twitter feed documents downtrodden Trump supporters’ regrets over voting for their guy

And it’s not just on the online hook-up scene. I’ve been writing about LGBTQ and race issues for a decade now, and recently the comment sections of politically minded articles written by me and by others have been filled with such blatant bigotry that I’ve had to look away. So many people seem to be tossing out their filter and letting their true colors shine too brightly.

It’s like we now have permission to give in to our basest basic instincts. I’d bet money that somewhere, at this very moment, some Grindr user who calls himself “XXL” is boasting, “I don’t even wait. And when you’re XXL, they let you do it. You can do anything… grab them by the balls.”

Trump didn’t create this particular monster. He’s not that smart. But he’s tapped into something that’s been bubbling under the surface, waiting to spill over. I’m sure he wouldn’t approve of those increasingly more brazen x-rated shots on Grindr (he is, after all, up with straight white men only and, as he said so himself, has “never had a gay thought in his life”), but they’re part of the package in this new age of uncensored and unaccountable.

Do what you want. Say what you feel. And you might still get to be President one day.

Related: Gay men, please stop using the term “BBC,” It’s racist, blogger says

Jeremy Helligar is the author of Is It True What They Say About Black Men?: Tales of Love, Lust and Language Barriers on the Other Side of the World. You can tweet him @Theme4Gr8Cities

www.queerty.com/trump-effect-american-politics-ruining-gay-etiquette-making-us-meaner-20170123?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

‘Moonlight’ Star André Holland Opens in August Wilson’s ‘Jitney’ on Broadway: REVIEW

‘Moonlight’ Star André Holland Opens in August Wilson’s ‘Jitney’ on Broadway: REVIEW

Jitney broadway

There are people we encounter every day about whom we may not think very deeply — like the grocer behind the cash register, or the Uber driver depositing us safely home after a long night.

In Jitney, which opened January 19 at the Friedman Theatre, August Wilson peers into the lives of men steering gypsy cabs around Pittsburgh’s Hill District. The year is 1977, and the mostly Black neighborhood is staring down the fate of foreclosures and gentrification. But Manhattan Theatre Club’s beautifully realized production finds hope in Wilson’s detailed portraits of men so often marginalized and rarely represented with such loving detail.

Jitney

Jitney first premiered in 1982, and is the final of Wilson’s 10-play Pittsburgh cycle to be produced on Broadway (Fences is perhaps the best known in the series; it was last on Broadway in 2010 with Denzel Washington and Viola Davis, who now lead the film adaptation). Each entry in the cycle examines Black life in the city during a different decade of the 20th century (Seven Guitars is set in the ‘40s, Fences in the ‘50s, and so on).

We’re inside a rundown dispatch station, where a rotary payphone alerts the men to their pickups, and a chalkboard keeps track of who’s up next. Becker (an excellent John Douglas Thompson) owns the business and employs four guys we come to know well. Youngblood (Moonlight’s André Holland) is both a striver and a hustler; his girlfriend (and mother of his young son) thinks he’s cheating on her, when he’s actually working two jobs and saving up to surprise her with their next big step.

Jitney

This being the ‘70s entry in the cycle, we’re also treated to some particularly colorful characters. Anthony Chisholm, who also appeared in an off-Broadway production of Jitney in 2000, plays aging alcoholic Fielding, an equally funny and heartbreaking font of wisdom from his lifetime of experience. Michael Potts plays veteran driver Turnbo, a hot-tempered busybody, and Harvy Blanks, another alum of Wilson’s Pittsburgh cycle, plays Shealy, a sartorially adventurous bookie, who uses the dispatch phone to take lottery numbers.

The main drama goes down when Becker’s son, Booster (The Americans’ Brandon J. Dirden) is released from prison, where he served 20 years for murdering a woman who falsely accused him of rape. Becker’s first wife, and Booster’s mom, died shortly after his sentencing, and Becker has never forgiven his son for becoming a disappointment.

Jitney

Under the direction of Ruben Santiago-Hudson, the ensemble functions as a family of sorts, and the play a kind of variation on a living room drama. Through the ins and outs of their days and how they relate to one another, we come to see what getting behind the wheel means to them; for Youngblood it may be a road to a better future, while an old man like Fielding is simply waiting out the clock. Wilson explores these different life stages of Black men in America, and how their experiences are shaped by the history of the 20th century.

As the guys spend their days shuttling people to various destinations, the drivers’ own journeys always lead them back to the same place where they started. With the added perspective of 30-some years, the heart of the play’s central metaphor is as resonant now as ever.

Recent theatre features…
Cate Blanchett Opens in ‘The Present’ on Broadway: A Gift That’s Not So Giving: REVIEW
Towleroad’s Top 10 Plays and Musicals of 2016
Teen Angst Musical ‘Dear Evan Hansen’ Opens on Broadway: REVIEW
‘Natasha, Pierre and the Great Comet of 1812’ Shines on Broadway: REVIEW

Follow Naveen Kumar on Twitter: @Mr_NaveenKumar (photos: joan marcus)

The post ‘Moonlight’ Star André Holland Opens in August Wilson’s ‘Jitney’ on Broadway: REVIEW appeared first on Towleroad.


‘Moonlight’ Star André Holland Opens in August Wilson’s ‘Jitney’ on Broadway: REVIEW

Sie zahlte 70.000 Euro, um sich schön zu fühlen – wie sie vorher aussah, glaubt ihr nicht – Video

Sie zahlte 70.000 Euro, um sich schön zu fühlen – wie sie vorher aussah, glaubt ihr nicht – Video
Die Geschichte von Fulvia Pellegrino aus Italien ist so außergewöhnlich, dass sie nur schwer in Worte zu fassen ist. Wer Fotos von ihr von heute sie…

Weiterlesen: Lifestyle, Schönheits-OP, Fulvia Pellegrino, Gay, Germany News

www.huffingtonpost.de/2017/01/23/sie-bezahlte-70000-euro-um-sich-schoen-zu-fuehlen_n_14331766.html

Madonna Issues Clarification After ‘Blowing Up the White House’ Comments Come Under Scrutiny

Madonna Issues Clarification After ‘Blowing Up the White House’ Comments Come Under Scrutiny

Madonna blowing

While Reince Priebus and Kellyanne Conway were litigating the Trump team’s “alternative facts” on the morning show’s yesterday, they also criticized the Women’s March, which had three times more people than the inauguration.

One celebrity they addressed directly was Madonna, who made a reference to “blowing up the White House” along with several F bombs during her speech.

RELATED: Why Team Trump’s Litigation of ‘Alternative Facts’ About Inauguration Attendance Should Alarm Us All

Said Madonna:

Yes, I’m angry. Yes, I am outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House, but I know that this won’t change anything. We cannot fall into despair. As the poet WH Auden once wrote on the eve of World war II, ‘we must love one another or die.’ I choose love.”

The NY Post reports on Priebus and Conway’s faux outrage:

“One of the singers said she wanted to blow up the White House. I mean, can you imagine saying that about President Obama,” White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus told “Fox News Sunday.”

Kellyanne Conway, a senior White House aide, said Madonna should have spent her day giving some of her “hundreds of millions” to a women’s shelter instead of making “profanity-laced insults.”

“This is destructive,” Conway told ABC’s “This Week.” I read in an article or two that the Secret Service may be investigating that.”

The place Conway may have read it was The Gateway Pundit, a right wing rag notorious for dredging up fake news stories and no doubt eager to push this one.

Yet Madonna has clarified, writing on Instagram:

Yesterday’s Rally. was an amazing and beautiful experience. I came and performed Express Yourself and thats exactly what i did. However I want to clarify some very important things. I am not a violent person, I do not promote violence and it’s important people hear and understand my speech in it’s entirety rather than one phrase taken wildly out of context.

My speech began with ” I want to start a revolution of love.” ♥️ I then go on to take this opportunity to encourage women and all marginalized people to not fall into despair but rather to come together and use it as a starting point for unity and to create positive change in the world.

I spoke in metaphor and I shared two ways of looking at things — one was to be hopeful, and one was to feel anger and outrage, which I have personally felt. However, I know that acting out of anger doesn’t solve anything. And the only way to change things for the better is to do it with love.

It was truly an honor to be part of an audience chanting “we choose love”. ????♥️????♥️????♥️????♥️???? #revoltutionoflove♥️#revolutionoflove♥️*****

Instagram Photo

 

Watch Madonna’s full speech below:

The post Madonna Issues Clarification After ‘Blowing Up the White House’ Comments Come Under Scrutiny appeared first on Towleroad.


Madonna Issues Clarification After ‘Blowing Up the White House’ Comments Come Under Scrutiny