Bamby Salcedo, Alok Vaid-Menon, and Amos Mac on why you should watch HBO's “The Trans List”

Bamby Salcedo, Alok Vaid-Menon, and Amos Mac on why you should watch HBO's “The Trans List”

Photos courtesy of HBO

The Trans List is the latest in a series of documentaries by acclaimed photographer and director Timothy Greenfield-Sanders. Like his previous films, which include The Black ListThe Latino List, and The OUT ListThe Trans List features a sincere, straightforward style of interviewing, giving a platform for people to share their life stories in their own voices.

Learn more about The Trans List and about IDENTITY: Timothy Greenfield-Sanders The List Portraits, an exhibit of photos from The Trans List and the other documentaries at the Annenberg Space for Photography in Los Angeles here.

Author, advocate, and co-producer of the documentary, Janet Mock leads interviews with eleven prominent and diverse members of the trans community in short, sharp segments that delve deeply into their lives, addressing identity, family, career, love, struggle and accomplishment.

Mock, in an an interview for AOL, said: “What was important for me to show was the community is not a monolith. That we have various experiences. That we are from different generations. We’re different ages. We transitioned at different times in our lives. That our experience with wealth and economy and access to employment and education is vast and wide.” Watch the full interview here.

GLAAD spoke with three of the people featured in the documentary: Bamby Salcedo, founder of the TransLatin@ Coalition, Alok Vaid-Menon, writer, poet, and performance artist, and Amos Mac, photographer, producer, and publisher, about why people should watch the documentary, their experience being part of the film, and what they hope people take away from watching. 

GLAAD: Why should people tune in to watch The Trans List?

Bamby: I think people should watch because the film provides a personal and human connection to the trans people it portrays. The film will be able to open hearts and minds, and hopefully people will get a better sense and understanding about who trans people are, and that will change the way people view and treat trans people. It is not only educational; it is humanizing and connective.

Alok: In a media moment saturated by cisgender people telling transgender stories it feels really exciting and beautiful to have trans people telling our own stories. What the film shows is that there is no “one” trans narrative. We are all extraordinarily different and have different ideas about what gender even is! This film really complicates the idea that there’s only one way to be trans.

Amos: The storytelling and raw emotion in the film is beautiful. Watch this film and get to know some trans people that you might not already be aware of. With a platform like this, it can be used to educate folks who think they’ve never met a trans person, or those who may have assumptions that our experiences are all very similar. There are as many trans experiences in the world as there are trans people. And here are 11. 

GLAAD: Why do you think the decision to have Janet Mock do the interviewing in the film was important?

Bamby: It was an honor to be interviewed by Janet, knowing that she is not only a celebrity but she is also one who is using her platform and bringing visibility to the issues that trans women continue to face in our society. The decision to have Janet do the interview made complete sense because of her connection to the community as a trans woman of color who has had many similar experiences to those she interviewed. It was the personal and intimate connection that allowed for a great interview.

Alok: It was one of the best interviews I’ve had! Janet really does her research and she asked questions that were probing and important. I could tell that she had engaged deeply with my work. It was so refreshing to be interviewed by another trans person. We were able to get past the basics of, “How is it possible to neither be a boy nor a girl?” and actually focus on the deeper stuff. There is a long history of cisgender people objectifying transgender people in interviews. We’ve all seen it before: a cis person asking about our transitions, our genitalia, our experiences with violence. Having a trans person interview another trans person was so necessary. It was a conversation on our own terms.

Amos: Having Janet, a trans person, who was both so active behind the scenes as a producer and an interviewer for The Trans List was incredibly important for my personal experience with this project. I felt like I was really able to open up for this interview. I trusted Janet immediately with my story. I also think it sets a great precedent for the media and entertainment industry: hire trans people to work on trans stories! This has not always been the case with the media, so I applaud the HBO crew and Timothy for getting that.

GLAAD: What do you hope people take away from watching the film? 

Bamby: What I hope is that that we as trans people are able to integrate within our society and should be integrated into our society. Regardless of our different experiences, we are part of society and should be included. If people can get the idea that we as human beings deserve the same dignity, rights, and respect, that would be huge.

Alok: I hope people take away that there are as many trans narratives as there are trans people — that each of us is extraordinarily complex and unique. This film is bringing trans and gender non-conforming life to a wide audience so I hope that people will be confronted with ideas and narratives that they’ve never considered before.

Amos: I want people to understand what we all have a very real human experience that can be relatable on different levels. And while you don’t have to understand exactly where I’m coming from or might not get what my experience feels like, you can simply respect me as a person. I hope it reaches youth or adults who might be looking for stories they can relate to. When I was a kid, it would’ve been life changing for me.

GLAAD: Do you hear a unifying theme among all the interviewees?

Bamby: I think the unifying theme is that everyone interviewed faces and faced different struggles, but we all have also overcome and overturned those different struggles into opportunities. Our resilience is unifying. 

Alok: I would say the one theme that ties it all together is all of us are advocating for gender self-determination. We talk about how so many systems (families, schools, prisons) prevented us from being able to determine who we are. We offer a simple demand: believe us when we say who we are.

GLAAD: What are actions allies can take to support trans and gender expansive people?

Alok

1) Don’t assume anyone’s gender until they tell you about it. Gender is not what we look like, it’s who we are.
2) Recognize that violence is an every day reality for many of us. Ask us how we are doing and how we need assistance.
3) Donate to trans (and especially trans people of color) organizations and causes. Our issues are often ignored even though they are among the most important.

Amos:

Listen to their stories. Respect their experiences. 

GLAAD: Any final thoughts or advice?

Bamby: Especially to the young people, understand that through this plight and these difficult times, you are not alone. There are people who are in the struggle and who have been in the fight and will continue to fight for a better future for you and us.

The Trans List premiered December 5 on HBO and will re-air on the network. It is also available on HBO Go and HBO Now.

A paperbook book version of The Trans List portraits and interviews is available for purchase on Amazon.

 

December 6, 2016

www.glaad.org/blog/bamby-salcedo-alok-vaid-menon-and-amos-mac-why-you-should-watch-hbos-trans-list

Korean Statue Portrays Jesus As Carb-Loading, Creatine-Slinging Muscleman

Korean Statue Portrays Jesus As Carb-Loading, Creatine-Slinging Muscleman

jesus

Was Jesus really, really buff?

That’s how he’s depicted in this eye-popping statue that can be found in a park in Yeongcheon, Korea, according to Viral Crunch.

Related: PHOTOS: Hunky Jesus Contest Brings Beloved Sacrilege Back To San Francisco

Although this is the first time we’ve seen it, Uproxx reports the photo has been making the rounds (at least once a year) since being posted on Reddit back in 2012.

Related: PHOTOS: 18 Times Jesus Was The Savior Of Sexiness

Actually, he might just be resting in-between sets of an intense chest workout.

200w

www.queerty.com/korean-statue-portrays-jesus-carb-loading-creatine-slinging-muscleman-20161206?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

Can We Get Rid of the Electoral College?

Can We Get Rid of the Electoral College?

electoral college map

In the aftermath of the November presidential election, Towleroad is exploring several legal issues related to the result, the incoming administration, and the future of democracy in America. If you have any questions, please email [email protected].

The Electoral College was created to protect slavery. Over the years, it has come to over-represent small, low-population states, which has the effect of diluting the voting power of urban residents, including persons of color and other marginalized groups. And, in the last 20 years, it has elevated two presidents who lost the popular vote. Given the Electoral College’s history, its effect, and its threat to democracy, shouldn’t we get rid of it?

Transitioning to the direct election of the president will be difficult. We could also work around it.

The Electoral College might be undemocratic, but it is enshrined in the Constitution. As such, eliminating it would require a constitutional amendment. Article V outlines two ways to do that: “The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress.”

We’ve actually never used the state convention process. So, we would need 2/3 of the House and Senate to agree and 3/4 of the States. In the incoming House and Senate, Democrats don’t even control a majority, let alone a 2/3 majority. I cannot foresee a future where Republicans in the House and Senate, whose party has won the presidency twice in recent history while losing the popular vote, would vote against their interests.

If we can’t get rid of the Electoral College, we could try to get around it. But it is not entirely clear that will happen, either.

The Constitution empowers the legislatures of the States to decide how they will assign Electors. Several states have already passed legislation to automatically give their Electoral College votes to the winner of the popular vote, regardless of how the residents of those states vote. The program is called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC). The NPVIC would only take effect after enough states with Electoral Votes adding up to 270 have signed on. As of today, the NPVIC has 165 votes, but with big Republican states like Texas likely unlikely to pass such legislation, the NPVIC will need some combination of swing state-Democratic leaning states to join. Michigan and Minnesota are a must, and so would some mixture of Ohio, New Hampshire, Colorado, Florida, Virginia, Nevada, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Meanwhile, Connecticut and Delaware, reliable Democratic states, have not even signed on.

screen-shot-2016-12-06-at-9-01-48-amThere are three significant barriers to the NPVIC. First, some Democrats think the Electoral College can still be a Blue firewall against Republicans. The 2016 election notwithstanding, states like Pennsylvania and Michigan and Wisconsin have still often voted Democratic in presidential elections. A small swing in those states would have given Hillary Clinton the presidency. Second, legislation passed could be repealed. A group of states could pass the NPVIC and campaigns could start reorienting themselves to a popular vote model. But political changes at the state level could inspire legislatures to make last minute changes if they felt the elections were not going their way. This uncertainty could undermine the entire project.

Most importantly, the gerrymandering of state and federal districts toward Republican majorities makes NPVIC unlikely. Despite the generally Democratic tilt of many swing states in presidential years (again, this year notwithstanding), many of the legislatures and governorships in those states are dominated by Republicans who, over the last 4 to 8 years, have reconfigured voting districts to dilute Democratic votes and secure Republican majorities. Since Republicans have recently been the primary benefactors of the Electoral College, it is unlikely they would pass legislation to activate the NPVIC.

All of this suggests that getting rid or eroding the power of the Electoral College is unlikely. Then again, we could just hope that the electors decide to vote their consciences. There’s a name for those people; we call them “faithless electors,” or those that defy the wishes of their state legislatures and, perhaps, state voters, and vote for someone other than the winner of the vote in their states. As much as I would like to trust that electors will recognize that Trump represents an existential threat to American democracy, we cannot rest the future of our nation on that hope.

So, for now, we are stuck with the Electoral College. This means that we need a legal and political strategy to advance a progressive agenda and defeat demagoguery, white nationalism and neo-Nazis, and hatred in a political system with the Electoral College.

The post Can We Get Rid of the Electoral College? appeared first on Towleroad.



www.towleroad.com/2016/12/can-get-rid-electoral-college/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+towleroad%2Ffeed+%28Towleroad+Gay+News+%29

HRC Mississippi to Hold “United Against Hate” Rally This Sunday

HRC Mississippi to Hold “United Against Hate” Rally This Sunday

Join HRC on Sunday, Dec. 11 from 3:00-5:00 p.m. CST for a United Against Hate Rally. Join us at the Capitol where we will gather and march to the Governor’s Mansion to call for the complete repeal of H.B. 1523.

Over the last nine months, Mississippians from across the state have gathered on multiple occasions to join voices and speak out against H.B. 1523. H.B. 1523, deceptively titled “Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act,” enables almost any individual or organization to discriminate against LGBTQ Mississippians at work, at school and in their communities.  

HRC Mississippi has been a vocal opponent of H.B. 1523, and has held rallies condemning the bill and has communicated our grave concerns with elected officials throughout the lifespan of the bill. On July 1, U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves’ blocked the implementation of H.B. 152 right before it was set to go into effect. As we await further action from federal courts around the law, we are continuing our call to action, and not letting up the pressure on our legislature and our governor. 

This Sunday, December 11, join us in Jackson, Mississippi to raise our voices in song. 

The event, entitled United Against Hate, will feature a performance of the song “My, My Mississippi,” written by Mississippi native Tena Clark to express her sorrow over this bill and our state’s history of discrimination. A choir of local Mississippians will also raise their voices to oppose this harmful bill. We hope you can bring your voice and join us, too. 

We will gather, not just because we share Clark’s sorrow over H.B. 1523, but because we share her hope for a state where everyone, including LGBTQ people, are welcome and safe. 

Please join us if you can on December 11. If not, we encourage you to find out more about the work we do at HRC Mississippi. We hope that one way or another, you’ll join us in the fight for full LGBTQ equality. 

www.hrc.org/blog/hrc-mississippi-to-hold-united-against-hate-rally-this-sunday?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

Samantha Bee Rips Trump’s Disastrous Transition, Celebrates Pat McCrory’s Humiliating Defeat: WATCH

Samantha Bee Rips Trump’s Disastrous Transition, Celebrates Pat McCrory’s Humiliating Defeat: WATCH

Pat McCrory Samantha Bee

Good news for everyone – Samantha Bee is back from hiatus, and she has a few things to ask her viewers, mainly, “So, how’s the transition treating you?”

Bee says Obama’s praise for our democracy and its “peaceful transition of power” may have come too soon:

“In the past three weeks, PEOTUS has ‘made America great again’ by skipping security briefings, imperiling U.S. relations with China and India, threatening a private manufacturer, draining the swamp directly into his Cabinet, declaring open war on the press, and celebrating Take Your Daughter to Work Day with foreign leaders….You thought there were rules? Psych! There’s also never been a rule that says the President can’t take a sh*t in the reflecting pool. Because we never thought we needed one. Now, who knows?”

Thanks for the illustration:

Trump reflecting pool

Bee then moves on to North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory, his pathetic demands for a recount, and his inability to accept the reality that his decision on HB2 cost the state millions of dollars, and lost him his job, but points out that Trump is even more pathetic:

“I can’t think of anything classier than crying conspiracy when you lose….Oh, yes I can: Crying conspiracy when you win!”

Watch:

The post Samantha Bee Rips Trump’s Disastrous Transition, Celebrates Pat McCrory’s Humiliating Defeat: WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Samantha Bee Rips Trump’s Disastrous Transition, Celebrates Pat McCrory’s Humiliating Defeat: WATCH

Senator Cardin Urges Secretary Kerry to Forgive Employees Laid off During “Lavender Scare”

Senator Cardin Urges Secretary Kerry to Forgive Employees Laid off During “Lavender Scare”

Last week, Senator Ben Cardin sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry urging him to apologize on behalf of the State Department to at least 1,000 State Department employees who were fired during the “Lavender Scare.

During the “Lavender Scare,” which took place in the 1950s and 1960s, federal and state governments investigated and fired thousands of employees who were suspected of being gay or lesbian, claiming that they were “security risks” who were vulnerable to Soviet blackmail.

“We’ve begun to make amends to LGBT men and women of our armed forces, who were similarly chased out of the military, and now it is time to show the same respect and right the wrongs that were leveled against our U.S. diplomats,” Cardin told the Washington Blade. “I have asked Secretary Kerry to formally start this process with an official apology from the Department of State and other appropriate steps.”

Senator Cardin, who is Ranking Member of the Foreign Relations Committee, received a 95 on HRC’s Congressional Scorecard.

“There is little we can do to undo the hurts and wrongs of the past,” Cardin explained in the letter. “But we can take steps to assure that the lessons of these episodes are learned and remembered, and in so doing make a contribution to assuring that such injustice will never transpire again.”

HRC thanks Cardin for his leadership and urges Secretary Kerry to offer an apology to the employees whose careers were ended by this discriminatory policy. 

www.hrc.org/blog/senator-cardin-urges-secretary-kerry-to-forgive-employees-laid-off-during-l?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed

HSBC Rainbow Lions in Support of Hong Kong’s LGBTQ Community Cause Uproar from Bigots

HSBC Rainbow Lions in Support of Hong Kong’s LGBTQ Community Cause Uproar from Bigots

HSBC rainbow lion

Banking and financial services group HSBC replaced a pair of iconic lions outside its Hong Kong office with replicas painted in rainbow colors in support of the LGBTQ community, and anti-gay bigots are pissed, AFP reports:

…the lions have sparked a backlash from conservative sections of Hong Kong society with some groups launching a joint petition against the artworks, calling them “disgusting”

The petition has been organised by Roger Wong, an outspoken figure against gay rights and the father of Joshua Wong, who famously led the pro-democracy Umbrella Movement in 2014.

It says that the statues are “causing annoyance to the feelings of many Hong Kong people as well as trampling on the existing family values”.

The petition adds that the rainbow colours, symbolic of the LGBT community, are emasculating and deprive “all the strength and stamina of the original lions”.

RELATED: Gay Civil Servant Challenges Hong Kong’s Ban on Same-Sex Marriage

Most people love the statues according to reports, part of a larger “Celebrate Pride, Celebrate Unity” campaign by the bank to support the LGBTQ community.

The Standard reports:

more than 4,100 Facebook users showed their approval by pressing the “like” button under a picture of the lions the bank uploaded to its page.

The statues were painted by artist Michael Lam and will stay through December.

We are proud to unveil our new lion 🦁 installation in #HK in support of #LGBTQ community #HSBCpride 🌈 pic.twitter.com/orcLgNgcsA

— HSBC (@HSBC) November 30, 2016

The post HSBC Rainbow Lions in Support of Hong Kong’s LGBTQ Community Cause Uproar from Bigots appeared first on Towleroad.


HSBC Rainbow Lions in Support of Hong Kong’s LGBTQ Community Prompt Uproar from Bigots