“San Antonio Four” today exonerated by Texas court of appeals

“San Antonio Four” today exonerated by Texas court of appeals

Photo Credit: Southwest of Salem

The “San Antonio Four,” four Latina lesbians who were wrongfully convicted in 1994 of aggravated sexual assault and indecency, were today cleared on all charges by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The women’s story is documented in Southwest of Salem: The Story of the San Antonio Four, which premiered in theaters and on Investigation Discovery earlier this year. The documentary includes poignant scenes showing the impact of the amount of time the women have served and how that has affected them and their families. You can watch the full documentary now on Investigation Discovery’s website.

“Those defendants have won the right to proclaim to the citizens of Texas that theydid not commit a crime. That they are innocent. That they deserve to be exonerated. These women have carried that burden. They are innocent. And they are exonerated. This Court grants them the relief they seek,” the court’s decision read. Read the full ruling here. In 2012 and 2013, after one of the accusers recanted and the forensic evidence used during the trial was debunked, the four women were released from prison but were still denied freedom.

Southwest of Salem premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival in April, and went on to win Outstanding Documentary Jury Awards at Frameline and Outfest. GLAAD has worked with the four women (Elizabeth Ramirez, Anna Vasquez, Kristie Mayhugh, and Cassandra Rivera) and the team behind the documentary over the past several months, including hosting a Q&A session and screening of Southwest of Salem as well as amplifying their story through a dedicated live chat on social media.

November 23, 2016

www.glaad.org/blog/san-antonio-four-today-exonerated-texas-court-appeals

Joe Jonas Is Cool With You Thinking He’s Gay

Joe Jonas Is Cool With You Thinking He’s Gay

joe-jonas-adam-levine

 

I don’t know the real answer to it. I don’t have an issue with it. I think it’s a compliment. I have a lot of gay fans. It’s not like it bothers me. Some people handle it differently, but at the end of the day, I’m cool with it and think it’s kind of funny. You have to learn to laugh; people are gonna create a story out of anything.

You know, it’s probably because I’m in touch with my feminine side. Look, I love fashion; I love to dress well. I love certain things like that. And I have a lot of gay friends, as well, so that could probably point them in that direction. But again, the gay community is something that is close to my heart, so I don’t mind. Hey, if they wanna think I’m gay, it’s fun.”— Joe Jonas, when asked by Pride Source why people think he’s gay.

www.queerty.com/joe-jonas-cool-thinking-hes-gay-20161123?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

Matthew Dempsey Had a Dinner Party to Talk About White Gay Men and Racism – WATCH

Matthew Dempsey Had a Dinner Party to Talk About White Gay Men and Racism – WATCH

matthew dempsey

Psychotherapist Matthew Dempsey got a group of friends together to have an honest conversation about white gay men and racism.

Dempsey invited Wilson Cruz, Alec Mapa, Justin Sylvester, and Sachin Bhatt to a dinner party to speak out about how gay people of color perceive racism in the LGBT community.

RELATED – Matthew Dempsey Owns His Racism As A Gay White Man: WATCH

zmapa

Dempsey and the crew discuss whether racial dating preferences are racist, the lack of representation of people of color in LGBT media (e.g. #GayMediaSoWhite), how gay white racism manifests itself, how to channel white privilege into a force for good, and what gay white men can do to positively affect change within the community–even right down to simple everyday things.

As Cruz says towards the end of the dinner party, “We are surrounded by white media and white culture. Maybe perhaps white people should expand their reach a bit…and perhaps it will give them a sense of who we are.”

PREVIOUSLY: Wilson Cruz and Matthew Dempsey Discuss Gay Men and Racial Preference: WATCH

Watch, below.

The post Matthew Dempsey Had a Dinner Party to Talk About White Gay Men and Racism – WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Matthew Dempsey Had a Dinner Party to Talk About White Gay Men and Racism – WATCH

The UK Will Ban Any Online Adult Entertainment Involving “Non-Conventional” Acts

The UK Will Ban Any Online Adult Entertainment Involving “Non-Conventional” Acts

Rylan-Knox-bottoms-for-Owen-Michaels-in-the-gay-porn-film-Play-Hard-by-Hot-House-3

It’s looking like UK Internet scavengers will soon be unable to access any website depicting “non-conventional sex acts,” according to The Guardian. 

Part of the Digital Economy Bill, a proposal currently going through parliament, will force all internet service providers to block any entertainment that wouldn’t receive certification for commercial sale from the British Board of Film Classification.

Related: GOP Platform Is Going After Internet Pornography, Which It Calls A “Public Health Crisis”

Attitiude reports there’s no definitive list of these sex acts, but it will likely include spanking or whipping, urination, vaginal ejaculation, sex in public, and “any form of sexual penetration into an orifice which exceeds the so-called ‘four-finger’ rule.”

In related news, Britons may soon need to provide proof that they’re over the age of eighteen before looking at any online adult entertainment.

Advocates of free speech are branding this a “prurient” invasion into people’s personal lives.

Related: Pornography Will Ruin America’s Youth, Because ALL PORN IS HOMO PORN

“It should not be the business of government to regulate what kinds of consensual adult sex can be viewed by adults,” said chief executive of Index on Censorship, Jodie Ginsberg,

Meanwhile, a spokeswoman for international porn site operator MindGeek, said:

Many of the sexual activities prohibited from R18 [the BBFC’s most explicit certification] are normalised and accepted aspects of healthy sexuality, and are proudly celebrated by the feminist, queer and ethical porn movements internationally.”

 

 

www.queerty.com/uk-will-ban-online-adult-entertainment-involving-non-conventional-acts-20161123?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+queerty2+%28Queerty%29

Jeff Sessions Whined About ‘Histrionics’ from Crying Son of Lesbian Mother Facing Deportation – VIDEO

Jeff Sessions Whined About ‘Histrionics’ from Crying Son of Lesbian Mother Facing Deportation – VIDEO

JEff Sessions

Jeff Sessions, Donald Trump’s pick for attorney general, complained about the crying son of a lesbian mother facing deportation during a senate hearing back in 2009.

The hearing was convened to discuss a bill that would have allowed LGBT people to sponsor a partner to stay in the country and avoid deportation since same-sex marriage rights were still at that time severely limited by the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

6a00d8341c730253ef01156fc70458970c-800wiAs we reported, lesbian mom and immigrant Shirley Tan testified at that hearing about being forcibly removed from her house by immigration agents. During her testimony, both Tan and one of her twin sons became clearly emotional. While Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy (VT) consoled the young man, Republican Senator Jeff Sessions had an altogether different reaction to the boy’s tears, as Chris Johnson at The Washington Blade points out. 

Session’s reactions was recorded contemporaneously by gay journalist Jamie Kirchick, writing for The New Republic: 

Unmoved, however, was Alabama Republican Jeff Sessions, ranking minority member of the Committee and the only Republican to bother to attend the hearing. At the sight of the weeping boy, according to a Senate staffer who was at the hearing, Sessions leaned towards one of his aides and sighed, “Enough with the histrionics.” Sessions’s press secretary did not return a call seeking comment.

LGBT rights activist Melanie Nathan, who helped get the LGBT immigration bill introduced in the Senate, also recalls the hearing:

I sat feet away from Jeff Sessions in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing and witnessed first hand the disturbing machinations of a true blood racist – homophobe – xenophobe. […]

I watched the beady smug face of Jeff Sessions as he jabbed away at the witnesses with his distorted version of same-sex relationships.  It was cruel – I watched as the sons of a stellar community member took the blows of those abusive assertions. I heard what he said that ripped at the hearts of those young loving sons.

Nathan also recalls that at that same hearing, Sessions called same-sex marriage rights, “‘special rights – the equivalent of giving these rights to brothers and sisters and roommates.”  

PREVIOUSLY: Donald Trump Picks Jeff Sessions, Racist and Homophobic Alabama Senator, for Attorney General

More from The Blade:

Sessions’ reported derision of the emotional display as “histrionics” is consistent with his opposition to same-sex marriage, his support for Donald Trump’s plan to expel millions of undocumented immigrants from the United States, his view that the Justice Department shouldn’t have stopped defending the Defense of Marriage Act in court and his stated belief the U.S. Supreme Court ruling for marriage equality nationwide was “unconstitutional.”

Rachel Tiven, executive director of Lambda Legal, told the Washington Blade she “of course” remembers the incident seven years ago during her tenure as chief of Immigration Equality, which helped facilitate the hearing.

Watch video of the hearing, below.

The post Jeff Sessions Whined About ‘Histrionics’ from Crying Son of Lesbian Mother Facing Deportation – VIDEO appeared first on Towleroad.


Jeff Sessions Whined About ‘Histrionics’ from Crying Son of Lesbian Mother Facing Deportation – VIDEO

Hillary Clinton’s Lead in the Popular Vote Just Surpassed 2 Million, But Don’t Call the DOJ Demanding an Audit

Hillary Clinton’s Lead in the Popular Vote Just Surpassed 2 Million, But Don’t Call the DOJ Demanding an Audit

Hillary Clinton Dallas Morning News Clinton

Hillary Clinton has received more than two million more votes in the election than Donald Trump, a margin not seen for a losing candidate since 1876.

The NYT reports:

Mrs. Clinton’s lead now exceeds the winning percentages of seven presidents, five of whom also won the Electoral College. And it has given rise to a push from liberal activists to demand audits in three states won narrowly by Mr. Trump: Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

But mainly it is pointing toward a structural disadvantage Democrats have with the Electoral College: Their voters are too concentrated in the bright blue states of the West Coast and Northeast.

Hillary Clinton’s national popular vote lead just surpassed 2 million (1.5%): t.co/j58GaxfPmH

— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) November 23, 2016

A group of prominent computer scientists and election attorneys is lobbying the Clinton campaign to challenge the election results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania after finding “persuasive evidence” of manipulation and hacking, New York magazine reports:

The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.

Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it’s important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.

According to current tallies, Trump has won 290 Electoral College votes to Clinton’s 232, with Michigan’s 16 votes not apportioned because the race there is still too close to call. It would take overturning the results in both Wisconsin (10 Electoral College votes) and Pennsylvania (20 votes), in addition to winning Michigan’s 16, for Clinton to win the Electoral College.

The deadline to file for a recount in Wisconsin is Friday, Pennsylvania on Monday, and Michigan a week from today.

A post on social media urging voters to call the Department of Justice to audit the results of the election is nonsense, the Washington Post reports:

The Justice Department doesn’t count up calls to determine whether it should launch an investigation. And they will not initiate a national audit — or force particular states to recount their results — based on the volume of outrage they receive from voters.

“The Justice Department does not tally the number of callers to determine whether federal action is warranted,” department spokesman David Jacobs said in a statement. “Investigatory decisions are based solely on the facts and evidence as they relate to the federal statutes the department enforces.”

The post itself showed up on Reddit at least two days ago, though its exact origin is unclear.

The post Hillary Clinton’s Lead in the Popular Vote Just Surpassed 2 Million, But Don’t Call the DOJ Demanding an Audit appeared first on Towleroad.


Hillary Clinton’s Lead in the Popular Vote Just Surpassed 2 Million, But Don’t Call the DOJ Demanding an Audit