Kids Of Gay Dads Are Perfectly Well-Adjusted, Thank You Very Much

Kids Of Gay Dads Are Perfectly Well-Adjusted, Thank You Very Much

GWK.High-res-of-B-and-F-and-Kids

It turns out, the kids of gay dads are alright!

In news that is sure to get the heads of homophobes spinning like Linda Blair’s in The Exorcist, a new study has proven that kids of gay parents are just as happy and well-adjusted as kids of straight parents.

Medical Daily has all the details on new research that’s dropping at the annual Pediatric Academic Societies meeting this week:

This latest study, led by scientists from Boston’s Tufts University and affiliated medical center, looked at gay fathers raising children under the age of 18. They elicited online survey responses from 732 gay fathers across 47 states on a variety of questions concerning why they chose to be parents, how they raised their children, and whether their families experienced any stigma or discrimination.

Comparing their answers to those obtained from an earlier survey of straight fathers, the researchers found no difference in the frequency of self-reported parenting activities, like reading to their children or going on outings. Similarly, 88 percent of gay fathers disagreed that their children were unhappy, compared to 87 percent of straight fathers; and 72 percent reported that their kids didn’t “worry a lot” versus 75 percent of straight fathers.

Unfortunately, gay parents and their children still face stigma:

…nearly a third reported feeling stigmatized for their decision to raise children, oftentimes from their own families. And a similar percentage said their children experienced stigma as well, though mostly from friends and religious institutions instead.

It’s fairly interesting stuff. We recommend you read the article and the study further, especially if you’re thinking about having little ones someday yourself.

We hope gay parents continue to be open and break through these barriers so that one day having two dads or two moms will be stigma free for all involved.

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/BhSFcQEVwWg/kids-gay-dads-perfectly-well-adjusted-thank-much-20160504

Steve Grand, Davey Wavey Will Talk You Through Hooking Up Online

Steve Grand, Davey Wavey Will Talk You Through Hooking Up Online

Steve Grand, Davey Wavey online dating

Steve Grand is more than just a pretty face. He knows a lot about acronyms (UC, $$$$ and DDF, for example) used for cruising online. Davey Wavey puts the church boy ho entertainer through his paces with a very challenging quiz about dating app terminology and he passes with flying colors. The guys then get into an in-depth and thoroughly educational discussion about how to decide on the proper profile photo (recent pics only, fellas!), finding the right app (Davey is a big Surge fan and will give you a discount tryout code) and online etiquette (don’t be an asshole, OK?).

Related: Steve Grand Reveals All About Sobriety And Lack Of Body Hair In Photo Message

Learn all you need to know about online dating below.

 

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/ymqrlf2hOMQ/steve-grand-davey-wavey-will-talk-hooking-online-20160504

SLC Gay Pride Parade Turns Away LGBT Groups in Favor of Corporate Entries

SLC Gay Pride Parade Turns Away LGBT Groups in Favor of Corporate Entries

SLC gay Pride

Critics allege Salt Lake City’s Pride Parade has become too corporate after at least 13 entries from LGBT community groups were placed on a waiting list for this year’s event.

Screen Shot 2016-05-04 at 8.03.30 AMHowever, parade organizers say only 30 percent of the event’s 150 entries are corporate, and that the LGBT groups were left out because they turned in their applications late. Bonnie O’Brien, who puts together the parade for the Pride Center, also says she will work to ensure that groups currently on the waiting list can participate in this year’s event.

KUTV.com reports that Michael Sanders (right), a gay activist who owns a local consignment shop, has marched in the parade for six of the last seven years, but was told there is no room for his entry in 2016.

“I’m disappointed,” Sanders said. “When I see a parade that accommodates corporations and big-business marketing to my community and doesn’t really have room for me anymore I feel that is broken. … The parade is our parade, it’s our protest march. it’s our call to action.”

O’Brien told KUTV.com that corporate sponsors are critical to the event’s success, brining in about $200,000 for the Pride Center each year.

“This building isn’t open and the services that are available at this building don’t exist without corporate sponsorship,” she said.

WATCH KUTV’s report below.

The post SLC Gay Pride Parade Turns Away LGBT Groups in Favor of Corporate Entries appeared first on Towleroad.



feeds.towleroad.com/~r/towleroad/feed/~3/5uAYcnYRwjw/

Does This New York Times Article Portray Trump As Pro-Gay?

Does This New York Times Article Portray Trump As Pro-Gay?

483208412-real-estate-tycoon-donald-trump-flashes-the-thumbs-up.jpg.CROP_.promo-xlarge2

New York Times article portrayed Donald Trump as possibly a bit pro-gay, or at least not as antigay as other GOP candidates, and the HuffPo’s Michelangelo Signorile is frothing mad.

It all started with veteran reporter Maggie Haberman’s piece “Donald Trump’s More Accepting Views on Gay Issues Set Him Apart in G.O.P.,” an article that is, quite frankly, full of more anecdotal evidence of Trump’s alleged gay-friendliness than any kind of real facts about the matter.

Hey, he appeared in a skit featuring Rudy Giuliani in drag! He wants Caitlyn Jenner to use any Trump Tower bathroom she pleases!

The reporter’s audacity to suggest that Trump is anything but the most virulent homophobe to ever run for office rubbed Huffpost Queer Voices Editor-at-Large Signorile the wrong way:

Trump articulates that gay and lesbian people should be treated as second class citizens with regard to their relationships, and has made a pact with our vilest long-time enemies, getting the backing of Jerry Falwell, Jr. There really is no other way to put it: We are not equal to Donald Trump.

I would hope that in 1968, a year after the Supreme Court ruled that states couldn’t ban interracial marriage, that a New York Times reporter would have objectively described a politician opposed to the ruling as a racist, or at the very least wouldn’t write an entire article telling us why that politician is “far more accepting” of blacks than other politicians because said politician happens to have had a a lot of black friends. After all, with both of them opposed to marriage equality, saying that Donald Trump is “far more accepting” on gay issues than Ted Cruz is like telling us that Barry Goldwater was far more accepting of blacks than Strom Thurmond.

Yes, that is the sound of a white gay guy comparing (apparently all white) gays to blacks in his first few paragraphs to make a lazy point, a point which is based on nothing but pure speculation, by the way. Sigh.

And so the indignation continues:

Gay commentators and pundits weren’t having it either, with veteran journalist Kerry Eleveld rightly criticizing Haberman’s piece at Daily Kos, as did J. Brian Lowder at Slate. More telling was the silence from gay pundits and reporters who inhabit — or aspire to inhabit — the New York/Washington media in-crowd that Haberman inhabits. I didn’t even notice any of them tweet her piece.

Haberman is a seasoned, smart journalist with a stellar reputation, and that makes her story — and her “he’s complicated” rationale for writing it — all the more baffling. One could write the same story about Trump on any issue, after all, because he’s been all over the place on everything, and one could choose positions and statements to selectively highlight while downplaying or omitting other positions or statements.

Well, as long as other gay commentators and pundits weren’t having it, either. You can find the rest of Signorile’s piece here, but to us, it seems like reporter-policing gone mad. The assumption that readers (of the New York Times, no less) aren’t intelligent enough to fill in the holes of a fairly interesting article is an unfair one. (Queerty actually ran a similar but better nuanced post on Trump: Five Times You Totally Hated Yourself For Agreeing With The Awful Donald Trump.)

With all the media sources out there, we could use more thoughtful analysis and less shrill nagging. For the former, read the Times piece here.

For the latter…well you can just about guess where we’ll send you.

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/i3kN-uUmfvc/new-york-times-article-portray-trump-pro-gay-20160504

Obama Administration Poised to Designating Stonewall Inn and Surroundings a National Park

Obama Administration Poised to Designating Stonewall Inn and Surroundings a National Park

Stonewall Inn national park Johannes Jordan wikimedia commons

President Obama is making preparations to declare the Stonewall Inn and the area around it a National Park, a move that advocates have been pushing for some time.

The Washington Post reports:

While most national monuments have highlighted iconic wild landscapes or historic sites from centuries ago, this reflects the country’s diversity of terrain and peoples in a different vein: It would be the first national monument anchored by a dive bar and surrounded by a warren of narrow streets that long has been regarded the historic center of gay cultural life in New York City.

Federal officials, including Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, National Park Service Director Jonathan B. Jarvis and Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), will hold a listening session on May 9 to solicit feedback on the proposal. Barring a last-minute complication — city officials are still investigating the history of the land title — Obama is prepared to designate the area part of the National Park Service as soon as next month, which commemorates gay pride.

Nadler and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) have asked the president to protect the site under the 1906 Antiquities Act. In a sign of how much has changed since 1969, the three officials who represent the area — City Council member Corey Johnson, state assembly member Deborah Glick and state senator Brad Hoylman — are all openly gay and endorse the idea of making it a monument, as does the local community advisory board.

New York lawmakers have been pushing for the designation for years.

In June 2014, Jewell announced a theme study of the area:

nadler_2Back in September 2015 we reported on a rally held by Nadler and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand to build support for the designation.

Said the organizers of that rally: “There are more than 400 national parks in America, two-thirds of which are dedicated to sites of cultural and historic significance.  In Seneca Falls, New York, Women’s Rights National Historical Park tells the story of the first Women’s Rights Convention held there in July 1848. The Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail in Alabama traces the march led by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the struggle for civil rights. A national park for Stonewall would tell the story of the LGBT community’s fight equal rights in America.”

Said Nadler to the Washington Blade at that time:

“The National Park Service, through national monuments, through national battlefields, all kinds of national things, illustrates the story of this country. It’s important to expand the diversity of this story presented by the National Park Service, in this case, to present the story of the struggle for civil rights of LGBT Americans. There is nothing in the National Park System that deals with this, and that’s a huge omission in terms of the history of this country, the history of this struggle and the ongoing struggle for human rights.”

Stoneall

The Blade added:

The U.S. government already designated the privately owned Stonewall Inn in 2000 as a national historic landmark, but that’s considered a lower-tier designation given to 2,500 sites throughout the country. Last year, the Department of the Interior announced it was undertaking a theme study to examine ways to incorporate LGBT stories into the the National Park Service. The new effort to have a national monument dedicated to the Stonewall Riots shares a similar goal, but is separate and distinct from the agency-led initiative.

The push has been gathering supporters from far afield as well. In March, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti wrote a letter.

Said Garcetti:

“Two and a half years before the Stonewall Riots in New York City, the first documented demonstration for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) rights in the nation occurred outside the Black Cat Bar in Silver Lake on Sunset Boulevard. The demonstrations happened after undercover LAPD officers arrested and assaulted bar patrons for kissing during a New Year’s Eve celebration in 1967. Displaying great courage and bravery, 200-300 Angelenos protested these police actions against the LGBT community. In 2008, as then City Council President of Los Angeles, I worked to successfully designate the Black Cat Bar as registered landmark in the City of Los Angeles.

“Los Angeles has played an influential role in the nation’s LGBT history that includes the formation of first American gay rights group, the Mattachine Society; the first gay publication, One Magazine; the first gay pride parade on the one year anniversary of the Stonewall Riots; and the first parade protesting the military’s LGBT ban. It is with this history in mind that I write in support of designating the Stonewall Inn in New York City as a National Monument through the Antiquities Act.

“Although the struggle for equal rights extends from coast to coast, the Stonewall Riots in 1969 served as an historic turning point in LGBT history. Recognizing the Stonewall Inn and Christopher Park in New York City’s West Village would honor the American LGBT experience in every city and help to teach people of an important historical event that has helped to shape our nation.

“The struggle for equality touches us all and our National Monuments are an excellent apparatus for telling America’s history. I hope that by designating Stonewall as a National Monument we preserve a part of history that has long lived in the shadows.”

The NYT adds:

White House officials said no decision had been made. President Obama has the power to create national parks and monuments, as he has done repeatedly during his two terms.

Even if Obama decides not to make the designation, it could still happen through Congress, and Gillibrand and Nadler say they have prepared legislation and are gathering support for it already.

(Stonewall Inn photo, top, Johannes Jordan Wikimedia Commons)

The post Obama Administration Poised to Designating Stonewall Inn and Surroundings a National Park appeared first on Towleroad.



feeds.towleroad.com/~r/towleroad/feed/~3/0Cx_-AazXt4/

Felicidad.

Felicidad.

Nick Fuentes posted a photo:

Felicidad.

Nombre proyecto: Su historia

Pareja: Leonardo y Miguel.

Fotografía de parte de mi proyecto de titulo: www.nickfuentes.cl/proyectodetitulo

Instagram: www.instagram.com/nickfuentescl/

#proyectosuhistoria

Leonardo y Miguel.

El año 2007, en las redes sociales rondaba MySpace, Fotolog y fue el lanzamiento del primer iPhone. Este fue el año en que se conocieron Miguel y Leonardo.

Miguel y Leonardo Fueron a una fiesta por separado a discoteque Blondie, Una vez dentro, y luego del cansancio que Miguel tenía al bailar se detuvo a descansar, ahí fue cuando lo vio, y de manera inmediata le gusto.
Miguel fue inmediatamente a invitarlo a salir, cosa que no fue nada fácil; mientras bailaban lo único que le alcanzo a sacar era que se llamaba Leonardo y le decían Toto en la población.

Miguel como buen psicópata de la época llego a casa, prendió el pc, ingreso a internet explore y empezó a buscar en google a Leonardo, iba en la página 5 cuando encontró su Fotolog, ingreso a este y observo a Leonardo, empezó a leer las historias, ver a quien tenía en favoritos; luego de tanta búsqueda en el Fotolog de Leonardo encontró su MSN, Miguel saco una sonrisa en ese momento en donde copio y pego el correo para ingresarlo en su MSN con MsnPLUS. Ahí empezaron una especie de ciber-amistad, se veían en personas de vez en cuando pero muy poco; así paso el tiempo, iban a discos o se encontraban en esta, al encontrarse no se separaban más hasta que llegara el día.

Pasaron los años, y las conversaciones que eran a diario, se distanciaron pasando a una vez a la semana y luego al mes hasta llegar al 2013, año en donde las conversaciones seguidas retomaron, pero ya no eran por MSN sino por el chat de Facebook; En unas de estas últimas conversaciones los chicos quedaron en reencontrase el día 15 de agosto; Leonardo lo invito a su casa, cuando llego el día y vio nuevamente a Miguel no supo que decir, Leonardo claramente se puso nervioso, nacieron sentimientos nuevos que nunca tuvo hacia él; Leonardo ya con más confianza comienza a preparar la cena “Caracoquesos” comida que a Miguel le gusta mucho, la conversación cada vez se hizo más fluida, el tiempo pasaba tan rápido para ellos que de un momento a otro llego la noche; eran las 1 de la madrugada y Miguel no tenía locomoción para su casa, así que se quedó en casa de Leonardo para dormir.

Pasaron los días, y los encuentros eran cada vez más seguidos en algún momento empezaron a “andar. El día 21 de agosto se detuvo todo esto, Miguel se fue de vacaciones a Europa, cosa que no detuvo que perdieran contactos, la aplicación Skype salvo la amistad en ese momento; Miguel en sus vacaciones conoció a un chico en Barcelona, con el que tuvo la gran parte de sus vacaciones; Lo tuvo que dejar, los sentimientos hacia Leonardo eran más fuertes.

Las vacaciones terminaron y Miguel volvió a Chile los primeros días de septiembre, pasaban los días y Miguel encontró que era el momento de tener una conversación para concretar sentimientos. Un día fue a la Universidad de Leonardo, lo espero por 1 hora, hasta que salió; En ese momento los 2 se vieron a los ojos y sabían que pasaba algo, pero nadie decía nada. Miguel lo llevo a una plaza cercana para darle un regalo, una Rosa Azul y una pregunta.

Quieres ser mi pareja?

Leonardo con una sonrisa de oreja a oreja respondió que Sí.

Actualmente los chicos viven juntos en un departamento mononito en Santiago Centro.

Duración: 2 Años y 3 Meses
Relación: Estable

Felicidad.