Senate Fails LGBT Youth: One Educator's Reaction

Senate Fails LGBT Youth: One Educator's Reaction
As a teacher in an urban public school system, I am used to being disappointed by politicians. They have failed our children time and time again, from the overwhelming gaps in resources between wealthy and impoverished districts to the failed promises and policies of No Child Left Behind. Although it’s easy to feel powerless in my position on the front lines of education, I’ve learned to let go of things I can’t control and focus on what I can: my classroom, where all students thrive and my LGBT students are protected, not just by my own classroom rules, but also by district measures that extend anti-bullying policies to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

On Tuesday, July 14th, the United States Senate failed our children yet again, voting against the Student Non-Discrimination Act (SNDA), a policy that would prohibit schools from discriminating against students based on their sexual or gender orientation. When I first learned of the Senate’s ruling, I was floored. I think I’m still in a bit of shock and disarray; it’s hard for me to imagine how or why this measure didn’t pass. After all, don’t all youth across our nation deserve to receive the same protections and benefits? When studies prove that our students are more at risk, don’t our politicians have a social and moral responsibility to protect them?

As an educator, as a GSA advisory, as someone who works directly with LGBT youth on a daily basis, I am simply at a loss for words as to how 100 individuals in a room could not reach a majority consensus on the importance of all students’ safety in schools, especially students who are — according to numerous studies — at large risk for depression, suicide and homelessness as a result of bullying. In my search to make some sense of this decision, I have discovered two possible explanations, both of which can be summed up in one sentence: politicians are so far removed from our education system that they have no idea what is actually happening in it.

Some politicians believe that “these matters” are best handled at the local level. The problem with that rationale is that many states in our country are simply not doing anything to support our LBGT youth at all. Administrators and local districts are ignoring their LGBT populations and sweeping instances of violence in schools under the rug. Many acts of bullying go unreported, not just by youth who are intimidated by their oppressors, but also by administrators who handle things “in house.”

Leaving anti-bullying policies up to the localities — many of which are still largely anti-LGBT in general — opens our youth to an unimaginable vulnerability. According to the HRC’s “Growing Up Gay In America” survey, 42 percent of LGBT youth report that their community is not accepting of LGBT persons. How can anyone expect communities who cling to conservative values to stand up for their LGBT youth? Many administrators are not able to leave their Bibles and their personal biases at the door; therefore, our youth are attacked, neglected, and ignored. Without national legislation to hold them accountable, we simply can not trust administrators, counselors, teachers, and local school districts to be unbiased in their approach to the bullying of LGBT youth.

Some politicians believe that Title IX already provides protections for LGBT youth, interpreting the word “sex” to extend to sexual orientation and gender identity. The flaw in this argument is that an overwhelming majority of our states are not operating under this interpretation. According to GLSEN’s recently released report, “From Statehouse to Schoolhouse: Anti-Bullying Policy Efforts in U.S. States and School Districts”, only one in 10 school districts has a policy that explicitly includes protections for students based upon actual or perceived sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. What’s even more alarming is that nearly 30 percent of school districts have no anti-bullying policy at all. Without explicit legal protection, these students are left feeling hopeless and powerless in the hands of their bullies, their school policies, and their communities. Taking into account urban students — many of whom straddle economic and racial minority status in addition to sexual and gender minority status — it’s not hard to see that our education system is failing. Big time. Our students fight enough fights. They deserved this victory.

I am privileged to teach in the District of Columbia, where my LGBT students and their allies are protected under discrimination laws that extend to sexual orientation and gender identity; however, an overwhelming majority of states do not have these same protections in place for their LGBT youth population. Leaving our LGBT youth in the hands of their local governments, many of whom are biased against their own LGBT population, is not just irresponsible or ignorant: it’s negligent.

In a country where marriage equality itself is a victory, this decision shines light on the fact that we are far from the mark of LGBT equality. Our youth need and deserve our movement’s attention. Parents and community members must advocate on behalf of their youth. LGBT students, families, teachers, and their allies must link in arms and take up this cause. We must, as a movement, come together and demand our state and local districts to include explicit policies for our youth since our national policymakers will not. To do otherwise is a great injustice to the very students who need it most.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/48373106/sc/33/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0Cdesiree0Eraught0E0Csenate0Efails0Elgbt0Eyouth0Eo0Ib0I78143740Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

REVIEW: The Old Shoreditch Station – Shoreditch, London

REVIEW: The Old Shoreditch Station – Shoreditch, London

With a prominent position on the corner of Shoreditch High Street and Old Street, The Old Shoreditch Station helps define the hipster vibe that this area is renowned for.

Whether you need coffee or a beer, whatever time of day, this is the kind of cafe that you dream of having in your neighborhood.

The Old Shoreditch Station

Read more from Gareth Johnson

Read more cafe reviews

The post REVIEW: The Old Shoreditch Station – Shoreditch, London appeared first on Gay Star News.

Gareth Johnson

www.gaystarnews.com/article/review-the-old-shoreditch-station-shoreditch-london/

Pastor Single-Handedly Saves Church. Oh, He’s Gay? He’s Fired!

Pastor Single-Handedly Saves Church. Oh, He’s Gay? He’s Fired!

Hutchison_640x345_acf_croppedWhen Benjamin Hutchison was hired as a pastor at Cassopolis United Methodist Church in Southwest Michigan, the church was on the verge of shutting.

Attendance had dried up, and if a big change didn’t come, the doors might have shut for good.

Hutchinson ended up being that change, quadrupling the church’s numbers in the first eight weeks he preached. But he also did more than that, attending regular county and village meetings and truly connecting with his community beyond the pulpit.

Related: This Flow Chart That Destroys Religion’s Case Against Gay Marriage Is So Easy, Any Zealot Can Use It

When it was discovered that Hutchinson had married his male partner, church officials told him he was “unfit” to lead the congregation. He was fired the same day.

Now that same congregation — the one he built — is speaking out in Hutchinson’s defense.

“This church was dying when he came here, they weren’t far from closing the doors. It was real close. He came in, worked on it, got people to come…He brought life back into that church,” said Kevin Hershberger, a church member.

Related: From Their Lips To God’s Ears: 21 Secret LGBT Struggles With Religion

“His message was, it’s in the Book of Discipline that we’ve got open doors to everybody. We welcome everybody, apparently, except for the pastor,” he continued.

Another church goer, James Solloway, told Fox 7: “He’s a great guy, the community will suffer a great loss with him gone. What his personal life is his personal business.”

And while we find it moving (not to mention promising) that a congregation would speak out in support of their gay pastor, we also have to wonder: Why would they choose to stay at the church if they don’t believe in its moral code? Isn’t that what belonging to a church is all about?

It almost starts to sound like a battered spouse defending their partner. “He may not treat me right, and sure he hurts me every now and then, but gosh darn’it if I can’t stay away from those big blue eyes.”

Dan Tracer

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/8Qq_2Pe3GUQ/pastor-single-handedly-saves-church-oh-hes-gay-hes-fired-20150717

Kathie Lee Gifford Admits She Initially Struggled to Accept Caitlyn Jenner’s Transition: VIDEO

Kathie Lee Gifford Admits She Initially Struggled to Accept Caitlyn Jenner’s Transition: VIDEO

gifford

Sitting down with Andy Cohen in the Watch What Happens Live! clubhouse earlier this week, Kathie Lee Gifford opened up about having to get used to her friend Caitlyn Jenner’s transition. Gifford, who is godmother to Kylie and Kendall Jenner, admitted that Caitlyn’s coming out as trans caught her completely by surprise.

“I don’t have gaydar, so I’m certainly not going to have transgenderdar,” Gifford joked.

Giffored added that she has yet to actually meet “Caitlyn” but is looking forward to knowing her.

“It’s bizarre…It’s a lot for people to digest And I think they’re all trying really hard to. And they’re trying to be loving,” said Gifford. “Bruce was one of the most lovable adorable sweetest guys in the world. That is all still there in Caitlyn. It’s just, you’ve got to – lets be honest – you’ve got to come to grips with it somehow.”

The post Kathie Lee Gifford Admits She Initially Struggled to Accept Caitlyn Jenner’s Transition: VIDEO appeared first on Towleroad.


Kyler Geoffroy

Kathie Lee Gifford Admits She Initially Struggled to Accept Caitlyn Jenner’s Transition: VIDEO

Proof No Penis Is Too Large For A Condom

Proof No Penis Is Too Large For A Condom

If any dude says he’s “too big” to wear a condom, we’ve got some definitive evidence to the contrary. 

On July 12, Twitter user Mousie posted an image of her fist and forearm in a condom to derail any man’s attempt at not wearing a condom. The caption reads: “If a boy ever tells you he’s too big for a condom, please send him this.”

If a boy ever tells you he’s too big for a condom, please send him this pic.twitter.com/SBEjF0p7lW

— Mousie (@DramaticEmily) July 13, 2015

 

The tweet appears to have resonated — with over 19,000 retweets and 18,000 favorites. 

Although Mousie received some criticism, with some challenging her claim that no penis is too large for a condom,  her message was loud and clear:  

@jacoballen9 There’s no excuse to not have safe sex and if a guy pressures you against your will for any reason, it’s a red flag.

— Mousie (@DramaticEmily) July 14, 2015

Preach, lady.  

Still don’t believe us? Kindly refer here

H/T Cosmopolitan

Also on The Huffington Post: 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/48368b02/sc/19/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0C20A150C0A70C170Cproof0Eno0Epenis0Eis0Etoo0Elarge0Efor0Ea0Econdom0In0I78185720Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

Advocates welcome ‘historic’ US ruling on workplace discrimination but urge for federal law

Advocates welcome ‘historic’ US ruling on workplace discrimination but urge for federal law

Advocates and campaigners for LGBT workplace inclusion have welcomed yesterday’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ruling in the US that that workplace discrimination against LGBT employees is barred under existing law.

However, many have said that it must be backed up by a federal law outlawing such discrimination completely.

The existing guidance cited by the EEOC is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

The EEOC considers anti-LGBT discrimination as being a form of discrimination based on sex. For example, a women who experiences discrimination because she is attracted to other women would be unlikely to face that discrimination if she were of the opposite sex; a man attracted to women.

‘We therefore conclude that Complainant’s allegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex,’ states the ruling. ‘We further conclude that allegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state of claim of discrimination on the basis of sex.’

The full ruling can be read here.

Transgender employees are already protected by existing guidelines, following a ruling made in the case of Macy vs. Holder in 2013.

‘This landmark opinion from the EEOC confirms what we have long argued in our cases,’ said Greg Nevins, Counsel and Employment Fairness Strategist for Lambda Legal in a statement.

‘Discriminating against gay, lesbian and bisexual employees violates federal law. Given the clarity and logic of this opinion, most courts are likely to stop simply referring to old, illogical rulings about Title VII coverage.’

Chad Griffin, President of the Human Rights Campaign, agreed, saying, ‘Discrimination has no place in America, plain and simple.

‘This historic ruling by the EEOC makes clear they agree workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation – much like gender identity –is illegal.

‘While an important step, it also highlights the need for a comprehensive federal law permanently and clearly banning LGBT discrimination beyond employment to all areas of American life. We remain fully committed to making that happen.’

His sentiment was echoed by Rea Carey, National LGBTQ Task Force Executive Director.

‘This is another historic victory for LGBTQ people and their families … today’s decision is an enormous leap forward and will provide another important tool in the fight against employment discrimination and unemployment experienced by LGBTQ people.

‘We need to further attack the scourge of discrimination in a comprehensive manner – and while LGBTQ people may file employment discrimination cases with the EEOC, we still need more. We must push for legislation that provides clear and strong protections for all LGBTQ people in every area of life – from housing to health care.’

Tico Almeida

Tico Almeida

Tico Almeida, president of Freedom to Work, praised the decision to Washington Blade.

‘We applaud the EEOC’s historic determination that sexual orientation is inherently a sex-based consideration, and we encourage all gay men, lesbians and bisexual Americans who face harassment or discrimination on the job to consult an attorney and file Title VII sex discrimination claims with the EEOC.

‘It’s time for LGBT advocates to retire the incorrect talking point that gay Americans can get married at Noon and fired at 2:00 pm without legal recourse. That kind of unlawful firing falls clearly under Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination, and it is already illegal.’

Selisse Berry

Selisse Berry

‘We are pleased to see this positive ruling from the federal agency charged with ensuring equal employment opportunities for all Americans,’ said Selisse Berry, founder and CEO of Out & Equal Workplace Advocates.

‘With our community’s recent legal progress, it may seem to be getting easier to assume that equality means everyone, but without rulings such as this one, we’ve seen time and again that is not always the case.

‘We cannot forget that even with this positive step forward, LGBT Americans in 28 states can still be fired simply for being who they are. This ruling is one more mile marker on a longer journey that we must continue to take. This ruling should help to accelerate our progress, but we still have much more work to do.’

Justin Nelson

Justin Nelson

In a statement to Gay Star Business, Justin Nelson, co-founder of president of The National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (NGLCC), said that his organization ‘applauds’ the ruling.

‘The EEOC’s ruling put a federal stamp of approval on a long-held corporate best practice of including sexual orientation and gender expression in non-discrimination policies. By allowing workers to feel protected in the workplace, they are empowered to bring their best selves to the workplace, which increases productivity, raises performance levels, and retains top LGBT talent.

‘We hope to see state and local governments apply the same principles of inclusion to their workplace protection codes, resulting in a national Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) that would ensure the well-being of America’s diverse and innovative workforce.’

Jon Hyman

Jon Hyman

Jonathan T. Hyman, Esq., Partner with Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis and expert in employment law, told Gay Star Business: ‘While Congress has been painfully slow to act on ENDA, the EEOC has picked up the slack. Indeed, for its 2014 fiscal year, the EEOC processed more than 1,000 charges alleging LGBT discrimination.

‘This decision makes clear that, in the opinion of the EEOC (and at least until federal courts tell us otherwise), LGBT discrimination equal sex discrimination. Employers that continue to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity do so at their own peril.’

 

The post Advocates welcome ‘historic’ US ruling on workplace discrimination but urge for federal law appeared first on Gay Star News.

David Hudson

www.gaystarnews.com/article/advocates-welcome-historic-us-ruling-on-workplace-discrimination-but-urge-for-federal-law/

Anti-LGBT So-Called “First Amendment Defense Act” Has Dangerous and Far-Reaching Consequences

Anti-LGBT So-Called “First Amendment Defense Act” Has Dangerous and Far-Reaching Consequences

Being pushed by anti-LGBT extremists on the far right, intended and unintended consequences of the legislation range from blatant taxpayer-funded discrimination to frivolous lawsuits
HRC.org

www.hrc.org/blog/entry/anti-lgbt-so-called-first-amendment-defense-act-has-dangerous-and-far-reach?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss-feed