Shaggy Has A Novel Approach To Stopping ISIS From Killing Gays (Yes, It Involves Shaggy CDs)

Shaggy Has A Novel Approach To Stopping ISIS From Killing Gays (Yes, It Involves Shaggy CDs)

20140725_tgf_shaggy01Hey United Nations, are you listening? Because Shaggy — yeah, ’90s Boombastic Shaggy — has some pretttty big ideas when it comes to stopping ISIS from killing gays and, well, generally doing other terrible things.

But please, Mr. Ban Ki-moon, President Obama, other dignified world leaders — you’ve got to keep an open mind.

It’s a two-point plan, really.

Step one: get Jamaican weed to the self-proclaimed Islamic State.

Hear him out: “They need to bag some Jamaican weed and distribute it amongst ISIS. I guarantee there won’t be any more wars out there. High people don’t want to kill nothing; they want to love,” Shaggy recently told the New Miami Times.

Seems pretty rock-solid to us. Now we know what you’re thinking — they’re going to want something to do with all that free time now that they’ve chosen to indulge in all that Jamaican herb.

Well that’s the genius of step two: send over a few Shaggy CDs. We’d obviously recommend starting with Pure Pleasure (1993), enjoying a main course of Boombastic (1995), and finishing up with 2000’s Hot Shot for dessert.

“If you’re able to cut a man’s head off, you’re sick. But right, music evokes emotion. So if they’re listening to Shaggy music or reggae music, they’re not going to want to cut somebody’s head off.”

Again, hats off.

We’ll leave you with this trip down memory lane, which true to his word, does not make us want to cut anybody’s head off:

Dan Tracer

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/1AdFt95nxdg/shaggy-has-a-novel-approach-to-stopping-isis-from-killing-gays-yes-it-involves-shaggy-cds-20150710

Vice President Joe Biden Offers Powerful, Poignant Speech Celebrating the SCOTUS Marriage Ruling: WATCH

Vice President Joe Biden Offers Powerful, Poignant Speech Celebrating the SCOTUS Marriage Ruling: WATCH

Joe Biden

Vice President Joe Biden offered a captivating speech on the fight for marriage equality at a Freedom to Marry event last night in New York City. Biden was introduced by Evan Wolfson, the founder and president of Freedom to Marry, who lauded the VP for being out front on marriage equality.

Biden, as you will recall, spoke about his support for gay marriage in a Meet the Press segment days before President Obama announced his own evolution, spurring more than a little bit of controversy. Biden has suggested that marriage equality will be his legacy

The Vice President spoke about how understanding that same-sex marriage is a civil right came from his father, early on as a teenager. Biden was driving his dad to work one day and picking up a job application for himself when they witnessed something unusual for that era:

And as we were stopped at the light, two men on the right — very well-dressed men, obviously, business people working for either Hercules or DuPont turned and embraced one another and kissed each other.  And they went their separate ways.

I’ll never forget.  I turned and looked at my dad, just looked at him.  And I’ll never forget what he said.  He said, Joey, they love each other.  It’s simple.  (Applause.)  They love each other.  It’s simple.

And Biden praised gay people for the struggle:

And it’s always been — the reason I’ve been so confident, it’s always been a simple proposition.  But it hasn’t been simple for a lot of you, especially those of you who are older.  Pursuing this simple proposition for many of you standing in front of me took courage.  It took moral courage, but it took physical courage — physical courage.

As you came out and stood up and made your case, unlike me, you risked a great deal.  I risked nothing holding this position I’ve had for so many years.

Finally, Biden also said that we must be vigilant about ending the discrimination that still exists and making people aware of it:

Just as the courage of gay and lesbian, transgender, bisexual women and men to stand up long ago and say, this is who I am, is what made ordinary Americans realize there’s nothing abnormal about this — these are people I know, people I love, people I care about — I believe right now — I don’t believe the American people, for that matter the people in those states — I don’t believe they even know it’s possible that you can be fired because you are gay or lesbian.  And I am absolutely confident that when the people and organizations in this room, and the President and I take this fight to the American people, we will win because all we have to do — all we have to do is let them know what the law allows now.

If you think I’m kidding to go any one of those states when you’re on business.  Ask at a train station or at an airport or when you’re having lunch, can someone here in this city be fired just because they’re gay?  I lay you eight to five you’ll get an answer, no, that can’t happen.  They don’t even know.

But once people realize this will end, as well.  So we have to raise the issue up.  We have to expose the darkness to justice.  As the great Justice Brandeis once said, disinfectant — the best disinfectant is sunlight.

Listen to the full AUDIO and read the transcript below:

Transcript:

REMARKS BY VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN

AT FREEDOM TO MARRY CELEBRATION OF VICTORY

Cipriani Wall Street, New York, New York

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Let me begin by saying I take full credit for Evan.   (Laughter.)

Evan, you’ve done an incredible job.  You really have.  (Applause.)  And not only your passion, but your incredible intellect and your tactical and strategic capability.  This has been — it’s wonderful to show up at a place that’s happy to be going out of business.  (Laughter.)

I’m here with Valerie Jarrett.  Valerie?  I don’t know where Valerie — (applause) — who is a great, great friend.  And my old buddy Kasim — Kasim Reed.  Are you here, Mr. Mayor?  Well, I’ll tell you what he is a standup guy.  And I’m delighted he’s here as he led mayors along with my adopted mayor in Philadelphia and others to stand up when — before it became — now it’s popular for everybody to stand up, which is a good thing.  It’s a good thing.  (Laughter.)  It’s a good thing.

But again I say I’ve never been so happy to be with an outfit that’s going out of business.  In fact, I was so confident, Evan, that you were going to be going out of business that I actually rescued one of your former employees, Kirsten Lance, who now works for me because I was worried.  I knew she wouldn’t have a job very much longer.  (Laughter.)  And she’s with me tonight, too.  I hope she reacquaints herself with a lot of her old friends.

I just want you to know that I really do think that it is an incredible job that you’ve all done.  Even when Evan was my intern back then, Evan did a great job.

This has been a heroic battle, but it has been based on a very simple proposition best expressed at least to me by my dad when I was a 17-year-old kid.  My dad was one of those — as the Irish say, the highest compliment you give someone is he was a good man.  My dad was a good and decent man.

And I was — I learned early on I didn’t like digging ditches in the summer with construction crews so I became a lifeguard.  (Laughter.)  But they paid a lot more money.  I was in a county system, in a county pool.  And they paid more money in the city.  And so my dad on the way to his job in the morning, and this — if you know anything about — you probably don’t — my city of Wilmington, there’s a place called Rodney Square.  And the buildings surrounding Rodney Square were the DuPont Company; the Hercules Corporation, which was big then; and ICI Americas, and so there were a lot of plain grey suits.  And an awful lot of — at 8:00 in the morning, an awful lot of men and women hustling off to work.

But the courthouse is in that square.  And my dad pulled up to let me run out and get an application for this job in the city, and then I was going to drive him to work and drive myself home.

And as we were stopped at the light, two men on the right — very well-dressed men, obviously, business people working for either Hercules or DuPont turned and embraced one another and kissed each other.  And they went their separate ways.

I’ll never forget.  I turned and looked at my dad, just looked at him.  And I’ll never forget what he said.  He said, Joey, they love each other.  It’s simple.  (Applause.)  They love each other.  It’s simple.

That’s what this has been all about from the beginning.  It’s never been that complicated for me because of the parents who raised me.  That’s why I didn’t have any problem — I had some political problems — but I didn’t have any problem.  (Laughter.)  And I didn’t have any problem with the President directly and honestly answering that question on “Meet the Press” that you showed.  (Applause.)

Now, here — I don’t say that for a reason.  Because look, I got involved in public life because of civil rights.  This is the civil rights movement of our generation.  This is what — this decision is as consequential as Brown vs. the Board.

And it’s always been — the reason I’ve been so confident, it’s always been a simple proposition.  But it hasn’t been simple for a lot of you, especially those of you who are older.  Pursuing this simple proposition for many of you standing in front of me took courage.  It took moral courage, but it took physical courage — physical courage.

As you came out and stood up and made your case, unlike me, you risked a great deal.  I risked nothing holding this position I’ve had for so many years.

In 1983, there was a Harvard Law essay making the constitutional case for marriage equality written by a young man, who wrote, and I want to quote.  He said, “Human rights illuminate and radiate from the Constitution, shedding light on the central human values of freedom and equality.”

That was the basis upon which I took on Judge Bork.  (Applause.)  No, no, let me explain because this is an important proposition.  Judge Bork and many conservatives, justices, and he was a brilliant man and a brilliant judge and a brilliant professor.  But he believed there was no such thing as any un-enumerated right in the Constitution.  Unless it was stated in the Constitution, it did not exist as a constitutionally protected right.

And I remember the opening exchange he and I had.  I hadn’t thought about it till I saw your comments.  We started the debate in the opening round, and I said, Judge Bork, I’m going to characterize your position on constitutional interpretation and you tell me if I’m wrong.

And I said, you believe all the rights I have as an American, a human being emanate from the Constitution.  And if they are not stated, I do not possess that right.

And he said, that’s right.

And I said, well, I believe I have certain inalienable rights merely because I’m a child of God — just because I exist.  The government has given me nothing.  Given me nothing.  They’ve just guaranteed to protect what I’m guaranteed as a human being to have.  All human rights, all human rights illuminate and radiate from the Constitution.

That’s what this is all about.

These were not words from an illustrious Supreme Court Chief Justice.  These are the words of your institution’s founder.  These are the words written by Evan Wolfson when he was in law school.  (Applause.)  Pretty courageous for a 26-year-old kid at Harvard Law School when the future looked so dark and lonely.

It took courage like many of you have demonstrated.  And like him so many of you have done so much for so long.  The last five or six years where I go within the community I’m being thanked, you don’t owe me or Valerie or the President or anybody any thanks.  No, no, no, you don’t.  We owe you.

It’s hard for me to imagine the sense of accomplishment you must feel.  Over the years in their homes, on our staffs, in the front lines of war, in houses of worship, Jill and I have known, stood with, supported countless gay and lesbian, bisexual, transgender Americans who share a love for their partners that up until now was constrained only by social stigma and discriminatory laws.

But the work all of you have done, laying the groundwork for the Supreme Court decision — their love, your love — it has been set free.  It has been set free like it never has before in America.  In fact, because of you — and I mean this sincerely — in my view if you check the history of the Supreme Court, the country has always been ahead of the Court — always been ahead of the Court in every major reaffirmation or assertion of a basic human right.

In my view the Court’s decision was inevitable because of you.  The Court had no choice in my view based on an accurate reading of the Constitution, but it also had no choice because the social mores of the country support the position you’ve taken.

I’ll say it again, in the process of this long struggle that began before my father uttered those words to me “they love each other,” there was a heavy cost, a heavy price paid by so many who went before.  I want you younger people here to understand the shoulders you’re standing on.

Your courageous efforts not only set you free and the LGBT community free, but it freed millions and millions of straight women and men.  (Applause.)  It freed them in a way — most people, it’s human nature, they don’t want to speak out against social convention.  So many remain silent for fear of being ostracized.  You set them free from the stigma that they feared, that they bear supporting the rights of their lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender brothers, sisters, friends, colleagues, roommates, neighbors.

As Valerie and others can tell you — and I think Evan can tell you — I believed from the beginning not only did the social disapprobation of society keep so many in the LGBT community from coming forward, it also intimated millions of straight people who didn’t have a homophobic bone in their body.  But now they’re free, as well.  They didn’t have the courage you have.  But they are free, as well.  (Applause.)

And by the way, those discussions with your straight friends, those discussions — ask them, they feel liberated and they no longer feel guilty.

Twenty years ago at a business lunch in this city if a gay waiter came up with a lisp and said, what will you have, and one of the people at the luncheon said, well, let me tell you what I’ll have, no one would have said anything.  Today that man or woman would not be invited back to lunch.  It’s a big deal.  (Applause.)

As I said back in May of 2012, I believe a majority of the American people agreed with me and agreed with you years before this decision was made.  But now it’s settled.  It’s settled in law.

But as you know better than anything, although this is a gigantic step toward equality, there are still many more steps that we have to take and so much more to do.  (Applause.)

You’re probably saying, why did Biden talk so much about where the American public is?  Because of the next issue I want to mention with you, and I’ll only keep you a couple more minutes.  (Laughter.)

Although the freedom to marry — and for that marriage to be recognized in all 50 states — is now the law of the land, there are still 32 states where marriage can be recognized in the morning and you can be fired in the afternoon.  (Applause.)

Just as the courage of gay and lesbian, transgender, bisexual women and men to stand up long ago and say, this is who I am, is what made ordinary Americans realize there’s nothing abnormal about this — these are people I know, people I love, people I care about — I believe right now — I don’t believe the American people, for that matter the people in those states — I don’t believe they even know it’s possible that you can be fired because you are gay or lesbian.  And I am absolutely confident that when the people and organizations in this room, and the President and I take this fight to the American people, we will win because all we have to do — all we have to do is let them know what the law allows now.

If you think I’m kidding to go any one of those states when you’re on business.  Ask at a train station or at an airport or when you’re having lunch, can someone here in this city be fired just because they’re gay?  I lay you eight to five you’ll get an answer, no, that can’t happen.  They don’t even know.

But once people realize this will end, as well.  So we have to raise the issue up.  We have to expose the darkness to justice.  As the great Justice Brandeis once said, disinfectant — the best disinfectant is sunlight.

So I want you to know this next door is going to be a hell of a lot easier to push open as long as we expose to average Americans the injustice that continues to exist.  So let’s all recommit to shine a blazing light on the ugliness of employment discrimination.  (Applause.)  It matters not just for the millions of American families.

Along with marriage equality, it matters that we use the power of our example to force — as a force for global human rights, to be a champion of LGBT rights around the world.  This is also has a significant foreign policy dimension.  Finally, finally.  (Applause.)  No, no, finally our actions are matching our stated values.  (Applause.)

So, ladies and gentlemen, the next fight will not take as long.  And let me close with this story.  I took my — three of my grandchildren to the World Cup, the Women’s World Cup Finals in Vancouver.  (Applause.)

And afterwards we had the privilege and honor of walking out on the field with our team and meeting all the women on the team.  We observed two remarkable things.  One was the incredible athletic prowess our or women’s national team that won their third national — world title.  (Applause.)

But two, and equally as consequential, we watched maybe the greatest women’s soccer player of all times, Abby Wambach — (applause) — standing there with flag in one hand, and her arm around her wife, giving her a kiss in the other hand.  (Applause.)   That was reason to celebrate.  It was just as normal as countless other times you’ve seen that happen.  (Applause.)  Harvey Milk was right, hope is never silent.

So I say in America, justice can never be permanently repressed.  It always needs and will be set free.  Congratulations.  Now, shine a new light.  (Applause.)

The post Vice President Joe Biden Offers Powerful, Poignant Speech Celebrating the SCOTUS Marriage Ruling: WATCH appeared first on Towleroad.


Andy Towle

Vice President Joe Biden Offers Powerful, Poignant Speech Celebrating the SCOTUS Marriage Ruling: WATCH

Can We Just, Like, Get Over The Way Women Talk?

Can We Just, Like, Get Over The Way Women Talk?
This post originally appeared on The Cut
By Ann Friedman

Like, have you ever noticed that women apologize too much? Sorry, but just humor me for a second here. What if, um, how we’re speaking is actually part of what’s undermining us in the workplace, in politics, and anywhere in the public sphere where we want to be taken seriously? I think it could be time for us all to assess how we’re talking. Does that make sense to you, too?

It makes sense to tech-industry veteran Ellen Leanse, who explains that women overuse the word just, which sends “a subtle message of subordination.” Essayist Sloane Crosley and comedian Amy Schumer tell us not to say “sorry” so often. A career coach warns the readers of Goop that women use too many qualifiers (“I’m no expert, but …”), which undermine their opinions. Radio listeners complain of “vocal fry” that makes it impossible to listen to women. And according to a Hofstra University professor, women who suffer from upspeak — also known as “Valley Girl lift”? — reveal “an unexplainable lack of confidence” in their opinions when they turn declarative sentences into questions.

As someone who’s never been shy about opening her mouth and telling you exactly what she thinks, this barrage of information about the problems inherent in women’s speech has me questioning my own voice. Here I am, thinking that I’m speaking normally and sharing my thoughts on campaign-finance reform or the Greek debt crisis or the politics of marriage, when apparently the only thing that other people are hearing is a passive-aggressive, creaky mash-up of Cher Horowitz, Romy and Michele, and the Plastics. I’m as much a fan of these fictional heroines as the next woman, but I want people to hear what I’m saying and take me seriously.

At first blush, all of this speaking advice sounds like empowerment. Stop sugarcoating everything, ladies! Don’t hedge your requests! Refuse to water down your opinions! But are women the ones who need to change? If I’m saying something intelligent and all a listener can hear is the way I’m saying it, whose problem is that?

“All the discussion is about what we think we hear,” the feminist linguist Robin Lakoff tells me. Lakoff is a professor emerita at the University of California, Berkeley, and, 40 years ago, pioneered the study of language and gender. “With men, we listen for what they’re saying, their point, their assertions. Which is what all of us want others to do when we speak,” Lakoff says. “With women, we tend to listen to how they’re talking, the words they use, what they emphasize, whether they smile.”

Men also use the word just. Men engage in upspeak. Men have vocal fry. Men pepper their sentences with unnecessary “likes” and “sorrys.” I haven’t read any articles encouraging them to change this behavior. The supposed distinctions between men’s and women’s ways of talking are, often, not that distinct. “Forty years after Lakoff’s groundbreaking work, we’ve learned that all such generalizations are over-generalizations: none of them are true for every woman in every context (or even most women in most contexts),” writes feminist linguist and blogger Debbie Cameron. “We’ve also learned that some of the most enduring beliefs about the way women talk are not just over-generalizations, they are — to put it bluntly — lies.” Maybe we don’t sound like a pack of Cher Horowitzes after all.

Still, I care about good diction — I want to be heard and understood. When I’m writing, it’s easy to do a control-F for “I think” and delete all of the wishy-washy words that are diluting my opinions. When I’m speaking, it’s much harder to notice which linguistic tics I exhibit. And until I started co-hosting a podcast, I was fairly oblivious to my own vocal patterns. Then the emails and tweets started rolling in, advising me and my co-host that we would sound a lot smarter if we could just pay a bit more attention to our speech. The list of complaints mirrors the advice-driven articles I’ve seen scattered over the internet lately. “Fingernails on a chalkboard,” wrote one reviewer on iTunes. “One has up-talk, the other has vocal fry and both use the word like every frigging third word… These are the ladies Amy Schumer goofs on.”

It quickly became apparent that if we were to take the advice of all of our detractors — carefully enunciating, limiting our likes, moderating our tone to avoid vocal fry — our podcast would sound very different. It would be stripped of its cadence and its meaning; it would lose the casual, friendly tone we wanted it to have and its special feeling of intimacy. It wouldn’t be ours anymore. “This stuff is just one more way of telling powerful women to shut up you bitch,” says Lakoff. “It makes women self-conscious and makes women feel incompetent and unable to figure out the right way to talk.” She adds, “There is no right way.” Especially if you want to sound like yourself, and not some weird, stilted robot.

Indeed, as with salary negotiations in which women are damned if they don’t ask for a raise and penalized for being overly aggressive if they do, tweaking speech to be more direct and less deferential comes with its own consequences. “When women talk in ways that are common among women, and are seen as ineffective or underestimated, they’re told it’s their fault for talking that way,” the linguist Deborah Tannen, who’s written several best-selling books about gender and language, told me. “But if they talk in ways that are associated with authority, and are seen as too aggressive, then that, too, is their fault when people react negatively.” Asking women to modify their speech is just another way we are asked to internalize and compensate for sexist bias in the world. We can’t win by eliminating just from our emails and like from our conversations.

Lakoff argues that the very things career coaches advise women to cut out of their speech are actually signs of highly evolved communication. When we use words like so, I guess, like, actually, and I mean, we are sending signals to the listener to help them figure out what’s new, what’s important, or what’s funny. We’re connecting with them. “Rather than being weakeners or signs of fuzziness of mind, as is often said, they create cohesion and coherence between what speaker and hearer together need to accomplish — understanding and sharing,” Lakoff says. “This is the major job of an articulate social species. If women use these forms more, it is because we are better at being human.”

Language is not always about making an argument or conveying information in the cleanest, simplest way possible. It’s often about building relationships. It’s about making yourself understood and trying to understand someone else. As anyone who’s ever shared an inside joke knows, it’s fun. This can be true even at work or in public — places where women are most likely to be dismissed because of the way they speak. To assume that our verbal tics are always negative is to assume that the goal of all speech is the same. Which of course is patently ridiculous.

Maybe women are undermining themselves a bit when they, like, speak in a way they find more natural. But only in the sense that they are seeking to articulate their thoughts more authentically and connect more directly with the people listening to them. Next time I read some advice from a podcast listener or from some self-styled expert on the internet about how women are too creaky-voiced, too apologetic, or using a word too much, I know exactly how I’ll respond: As if.

Also from The Cut:
Kanye Styled Kim In Lingerie At A Château
What 10 Nude Athletes Can Teach You About Loving Your Body
Rihanna Found This Woman On Instagram, Made The American Dream Come True
Colorado Figured Out How To Dramatically Lower The Teen Birthrate
Living In L.A. Made Me Get Over My Body Issues

ALSO ON HUFFPOST:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/48033cb0/sc/7/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0Cthecut0Ccan0Ewe0Ejust0Eget0Eover0Ethe0Eway0Ewomen0Etalk0Ib0I7770A5340Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm

This stained glass window can charge your phone

This stained glass window can charge your phone

Solar power is still gaining momentum, be it in the form of roof-mounted solar panels or portable cells used to charge your phone.

But as environmentally friendly and efficient as solar energy may be, kitting your home out doesn’t make for the most attractive sight.

Cue the Current Window by Dutch designer Marjan van Aubel, which is very much a high-tech version of a classic stained glass window.

Devices can be charged via USB ports integrated into the window ledge.

Devices can be charged via USB ports integrated into the window ledge.

Described as ‘an example of energy-harvesting in a natural and aesthetic way’, the design is part of the van Aubel’s Energy Collection.

The colored glass pieces, made from Dye Sensitised Solar Cells, generate electricity from daylight by essentially imitating the process of photosynthesis.

In plants, shades of green chlorophyll absorb light – for the current window, the cells use properties of different colors to create an electrical current.

While the windows can’t provide enough energy for a whole household, they create enough to power various electrical appliances; integrated USB ports in the window ledge enable users to charge phones or other devices.

 

The post This stained glass window can charge your phone appeared first on Gay Star News.

Stefanie Gerdes

www.gaystarnews.com/article/this-stained-glass-window-can-charge-your-phone/

This Lesbian Media Power Broker Makes Mark Zuckerberg Sweat. Here’s Five Reasons We Love Her

This Lesbian Media Power Broker Makes Mark Zuckerberg Sweat. Here’s Five Reasons We Love Her

kara-swisher-shadesThere’s a reason Kara Swisher makes Mark Zuckerberg twitch and sweat: She’s one of the most powerful digital media players today.

In fact, she wields such an influence on Silicon Valley’s wheelings and dealings, its been reported that Yahoo execs can sit and watch their stock prices plummet in direct response to her posts. She’s confrontational, hilarious, prolific, and counts the likes of Martha Stewart, Barry Diller, and Al Gore among her friends (or “frienemies,” as the case often is.)

Her lifestyle is, in her own words, “ripping apart technologists, then going to a party with them.” And yes, she’s also gay, m’kay? Having just sold her tech blog Re/Code to Vox Media, we thought it would be a good time to let everyone know about Queerty’s latest crush.

How Do We Love Tech Columnist Kara Swisher? Let Us Count The Ways. (Okay, There Are Five.)

1. She’s a strong personality who can charm any room –– or any male executive –– anywhere.

Swisher’s career began the day she rang up Larry Kramer (but not that Larry Kramer; the former Metro Editor at Washington Post). The moment he picked up the phone, Swisher lambasted the paper’s parade of factual inaccuracies and typographical errors under his watch. (Her family gave Kara the nickname Tempesta, Italian for “storm,” for good reason.) Kramer dared her to come and say that to his face. She did, and he punished her on the spot — by hiring her as a freelance reporter. Thus began a trend that’s since defined her career: expediently moving up the food chain by standing up to bigwigs.

2. The fact that she’s a lesbian isn’t nearly the most interesting thing about her.

The Princeton, New Jersey, native and Game of Thrones-obsessive is an advocate for the cause simply by being her own brash, outspoken, shameless self. (She even refers to herself as Sherlock Homo.) Her father died of a cerebral hemorrhage when he was thirty-four, and she was only five — and one of her coping mechanisms was to cultivate an unswerving, obsessive work ethic. She breaks news every week, and has an uncanny knack for weeding out well-hidden, unpleasant truths about the tech industry and the shifty people operating in it. The dearth of women in Silicon Valley is an ongoing concern. She was first to report that Mozilla’s Brendan Eich donated to anti-marriage equality Proposition 8. She exposed the fact that RadiumOne’s Gurbaksh Chabal was charged with 45 felony counts for beating his girlfriend.

“It is a constant joke in the Valley when people write memos for them to say, ‘I hope Kara never sees this,’ Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg told New York. It certainly takes a special kind of intelligence to nearly legitimize Kim Kardashian’s “entrepreneurial” exploits, as Swisher demonstrated in an intimate Re/Code interview last year.

3. She married well, very well.

In 1999, Swisher married Megan Smith, who currently serves as the Unites States’ first female  Chief Technology Officer. A highly influential executive, and one of the valley’s richest women, Smith’s intimidating resume includes a long tenure as a Google Vice President (she focused on New Business Development for nine years before becoming a VP for the leadership team) and a prior turn as the CEO of now-defunct LGBT media company PlanetOut.

For reasons unknown, the power duo — who have two young sons — are currently separated.

4. She managed to unload her tech blog to a great company (even though it’s not very popular.)

Despite the fact that Swisher’s relatively new website Re/Code hasn’t been particularly well trafficked, she’s strategically taken advantage of the ever-changing digital landscape by selling the site to Vox Media for an undisclosed sum. The all-stock deal situates Re/Code alongside popular properties The Verge and Racked, a move that’s certain to drive up traffic, which has been conspicuously flagging since Swisher and fellow journalist Walt Mossberg left the popular AllThingsD column (owned by Dow Jones) to start the venture.

“Everybody is bigger than us,” Swisher told the The New York Times. “It’s not a secret that being a smaller fish is really hard.”

5. For someone with a seriously lacking fashion sense, she’s not afraid to criticize others.

Swisher’s well aware that she doesn’t know how to dress. “I don’t have bad taste,” she told SFGate in a 2012 profile, “I have no taste. I wear a lot of the things I wore in high school, but not the cowl-neck sweaters.” (Note to Kara: cowl necks are back in.) Fortunately, that doesn’t stop her from making entertaining jibes at the ill-advised fashion choices of her peers. On investor Tony Conrad: “He’s a very good venture capitalist,” she told New York. “He also dresses like a lesbian.” This, the magazine notes, is an insult she keeps on heavy rotation: She also had the nerve to tell Twitter CEO Dick Costolo that he dresses “like Ellen.”

Derek de Koff

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/FW97hVt453A/this-lesbian-media-power-broker-makes-mark-zuckerberg-sweat-heres-five-reasons-we-love-her-20150710

WATCH: Jennifer Hudson Surprises Grooms at Gay Wedding in Dallas

WATCH: Jennifer Hudson Surprises Grooms at Gay Wedding in Dallas

hudson

Two grooms in Texas got the wedding surprise of their lives after Jennifer Hudson herself decided to crash the wedding and sing a special song for the newlyweds on Wednesday.

Hudson was there at the wedding of Scott and Chris Lindsey inside the W Dallas-Victory hotel as an ambassador for the Human Rights Campaign’s Turn It Up For Change campaign partnership with W Hotels Worldwide. The two grooms work for HRC and were previously married in Canada back in 2006.

“I’m very connected to the gay community, and it’s something I’m passionate about,” Hudson told People magazine last year of the Turn It Up For Change campaign. “It only makes sense. This is my way of returning it.”

Watch Hudson dazzle the couple and audience with her performace of “I Still Love You” in the video below:

 

The post WATCH: Jennifer Hudson Surprises Grooms at Gay Wedding in Dallas appeared first on Towleroad.


Kyler Geoffroy

WATCH: Jennifer Hudson Surprises Grooms at Gay Wedding in Dallas

Megan Rapinoe Needs Only One Perfect, Empowering Word To Describe Herself

Megan Rapinoe Needs Only One Perfect, Empowering Word To Describe Herself

Megan Rapinoe joined SportsCenter on Thursday to discuss all things Women’s World Cup. At one point, the midfielder for the Women’s National Team was given a simple but difficult task: define yourself in one word. And, well, she seized the opportunity. 

 

Rapinoe is a proud and openly gay woman and a former recipient of the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center’s Board of Directors Award. She’s also just one of the many openly gay athletes who participated in the Women’s World Cup this year — one area where their male peers are still lagging far, far behind.  

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677065/s/480289ff/sc/14/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0C20A150C0A70C10A0Cmegan0Erapinoe0Eneeds0Eonly0Eone0Eperfect0Eempowering0Eword0Eto0Edescribe0Eherself0In0I77695820Bhtml0Dutm0Ihp0Iref0Fgay0Evoices0Gir0FGay0KVoices/story01.htm