Don't Misuse Religious Freedom to License Public Officials to Discriminate

Don't Misuse Religious Freedom to License Public Officials to Discriminate

On Monday the North Carolina Senate voted to override Governor McCrory’s veto of a bill that would authorize government officials across the state to refuse to perform marriages or even issue marriage licenses when they have a religious objection. As a pastor, I consider this bill an affront to both the dignity of all North Carolinians and the principle of religious liberty, and believe that the governor’s veto should be sustained.

The bill was prompted by federal court decisions holding that LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) individuals have a constitutional right to get married. That issue is subject to the case that the Supreme Court is expected to decide shortly. Of course, no minsters or other religious officials can be required to perform or recognize any marriage that violates their religious convictions. But public officials must do their jobs without discriminating against any segment of the public regardless of their religious or political beliefs. As Governor McCrory said in explaining his decision to veto the bill, “no public official who voluntarily swears to support and defend the Constitution and to discharge all duties of their office should be exempt from upholding that oath.”

The bill wouldn’t just apply to officials who object to same-sex marriages. Government officials could exempt themselves from performing an interracial marriage or from issuing a license to people of different religions, or divorced people, or anyone else if they claim to have a religious objection.

In a failed attempt to mask the clear discriminatory intent of the legislation, the bill states that a magistrate who decides not to perform a particular wedding must refrain from performing any marriage for at least six months. If the result is that all officials in a county are precluded from issuing licenses or performing marriages, the chief judge or register is responsible for ensuring that some official can issue licenses and perform marriages at some time. If enforced, this provision could hurt anyone trying to get married in North Carolina, forcing couples to go from official to official or even county to county to find someone who will marry them. So the result of creating a way for magistrates to discriminate against same-sex couples could well be hassles for straight as well as LGBT people.

As a pastor, I certainly agree that the principle of religious liberty must be protected. The freedom of individuals to practice, or not to practice, any religion they choose was a founding principle of our country. Laws that actually protect individuals’ exercise of religion prevent the government from infringing on our constitutional rights under the First Amendment. But this bill is a blatant attempt to misuse religious liberty to license public officials to ignore laws they don’t like and to discriminate. If this bill becomes law, should we expect next a bill allowing police officers to refuse to investigate robberies at mosques or permitting firefighters to decline to put out fires at synagogues because of religious objections? That is disturbingly similar to the rationale being offered by supporters of this anti-gay bill.

A vote on the override in the House could be as soon as this week, and I urge members of the House not to follow the wrong-headed example of the Senate. Governor McCrory was right to veto the bill. Let’s keep his veto in place and avoid letting this discriminatory bill become law.

Reverend Dr. Terence K. Leathers is pastor at Mt. Vernon Christian Church in Clayton, North Carolina and a member of People For the American Way’s African American Ministers In Action.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/rev-dr-terence-k-leathers/dont-misuse-religious-fre_b_7510502.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices

Dustin Lance Black and Tyler Glenn Have a Bad Break-up in Neon Trees' 'Songs I Can't Listen To' – VIDEO

Dustin Lance Black and Tyler Glenn Have a Bad Break-up in Neon Trees' 'Songs I Can't Listen To' – VIDEO

Songs

Alt-rock’s Neon Trees is out with a music video for their new single “Songs I Can’t Listen To’ featuring lead singer Tyler Glenn and Oscar-winning screenwriter Dustin Lance Black as a crazy-in-love couple facing the end of their relationship. 

And while there’s sadly no Tom Daley cameo, the music video is still well worth a watch.

Check it out, AFTER THE JUMP

Songs2

 


Kyler Geoffroy

www.towleroad.com/2015/06/dustin-lance-black-and-tyler-glenn-have-a-bad-break-up-in-neon-trees-songs-i-cant-listen-to-video.html

Ugandan Prime Minister Is Questioned About The Persecution Of LGBT People. Here Is His Response

Ugandan Prime Minister Is Questioned About The Persecution Of LGBT People. Here Is His Response

Screen-Shot-2015-05-15-at-11.36.25-AM-360x257[Charlie Rounds is managing director at Out Think Partners, where he leads efforts to improve the lives of LGBT people globally. Charlie served for more than three years in Peace Corps Cameroon. He lives in Minneapolis with his partner.]

Last week I attended a breakfast with Prime Minister Rugunda of Uganda. The Humphrey Institute of the University of Minnesota had invited a few of us to hear him talk about development initiatives, as well as peace and security issues in Uganda and Southern Africa. The Prime Minister was encouraged to visit the University by the current US Ambassador who is a native Minnesotan and graduate of the University. Knowing that there was a strong human rights contingency in the room I mostly wanted to see how he would react when the anti-homosexuality law was brought up. I was  tense but pleased when we were all asked to state our names and what we did before the Prime Minister spoke: Charlie Rounds. I am a consultant for companies and governments on global LGBT rights issues.

During his talk the Prime Minister focused on the improving health situation of Ugandans including the drop in infant mortality, much more successful tactics against malaria and HIV, as well as the defeat of war lords who had inflicted incredible damage on the people of Uganda. While he was talking, all I could think about was that normally I would be thrilled to hear this (I spent years living in Africa as a Peace Corps volunteer) but I was very conflicted. On one hand I very much want the people of Uganda to lead healthier, happy lives. On the other I have seen the videos, heard the recordings, and read the writings of Ugandans who have made life hell for their LGBT brothers and sisters. Quite frankly if the Ugandan Supreme Court had not struck down the Anti-homosexuality bill – life would be even worse for our community there. 

Once he finished speaking it was opened up for Q&A and I very much wanted to NOT ask the gay question as I felt it would be more effective coming from someone else. Fortunately a professor of human rights at the University asked: “Mr. Prime Minister – my human rights students’ number one concern is the treatment of LGBT people globally – please tell us what is going on in Uganda around LGBT rights?” The Prime Minister came back with what we hear all of the time – that it is “the West” that has brought the laws – either the British through their colonial “buggery” statutes – or currently the American Evangelicals who helped craft the actual bill. This really was not easy to hear and made me question who is running Uganda – [Antigay U.S. evangelical] Scott Lively, Henry the VIII, or President Museveni?

To use the lives of the most vulnerable of your people for political gain is wrong – I criticize it when the Tea Party does it here with food stamps and basic health care for the working poor – and I have to criticize it in Uganda where our community has suffered because of the anti-homosexuality law.

In the end the Prime Minister explicitly expressed that the worst was over and that cooler heads needed to, and would prevail. He stated that homosexuals had always lived in Uganda and always would and if foreign influences on each side could just stay out that the people of Uganda would be able to find a path forward that could, and should, improve the lives of the LGBT community.

I think that all of us want a better life for all Ugandans. I actually do think that through dialogue we can achieve this. Mark Twain stated “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts.” Prime Minister Rugunda is less prejudice after traveling to Minnesota and I believe that if we can safely take more and more openly LGBT people, our friends, and families to Uganda – we also can be less prejudiced.

So my hope is that, in fact, the worst is over, and that as LGBT Americans we can lead the way in improving the lives of all Ugandans – but “all” must mean “all.”

Chris Bull

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/A8ugDOxs1qA/ugandan-prime-minister-is-questioned-about-the-persecution-of-lgbt-people-here-is-his-response-20150604

This Air Force Captain Used Grindr And Scruff To Raise $59K To Fight HIV

This Air Force Captain Used Grindr And Scruff To Raise $59K To Fight HIV

FullSizeRender-2U.S. Air Force Captain Anthony Interrante, 34, refused to let a Middle East deployment stop him from riding in this year’s AIDS/LifeCycle or from finishing the 545-mile ride, which began on Sunday, May 31, as one of the top fundraisers.

How does a critical care flight nurse serving in Afghanistan raise more than $59,000 to fight HIV?  “Easy,” says the built and chiseled native of Philadelphia, “I mostly used Grindr and Scruff.”

“People told me I should send out emails to friends telling them about my training and asking for their support,” says Interrante. “But training wasn’t exactly something that comes easy in Bagram. If I had to talk about training, I’d end up having to pay my own way.”

So the openly gay Air Force officer turned to social media – but not just Facebook.

“I would engage with everyone around the world who would send me a ‘woof’ or whatever, eventually telling them that I was going to be riding 545 miles to help end HIV and that I’d appreciate their support. I was amazed by how generous people were.”

About $56,000 of the money he raised for the seven-day ride from San Francisco to Los Angeles was from hundreds of strangers — representing every continent, including Antarctica — who were enticed to connect with him online via his sexy swimsuit picture.

unnamed“I know I’ve got a lot of thank you notes to write and I’m truly humbled by all the support,” says the Vacaville, California resident, “and not just for me, but for the amazing work of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation and Los Angeles LGBT Center that benefit from this event.”

The fundraising certainly proved to be easier than the training, since riding a road bike in Bagram wasn’t an option, and not just because of the 100-degree heat. “I did  more CrossFit than anyone should and I learned to own a spin bike for two to three hours at a time,” says Interrante, who didn’t ride an actual bike until the 82-mile first day of AIDS/LifeCycle.

How’s he doing after day three? “I’m feeling great,” says the member of AIDS/LifeCycle’s Team Mary, “and I’m feeling even better that we’ve raised more than $16 million to fight HIV. I’ve never lost anyone to HIV and I’m riding because I don’t want anyone to have to deal with that kind of loss.”

 

Jim Key is Chief Marketing Officer of the Los Angeles LGBT Center. Follow him on Twitter at @JamesDKey.

Jeremy Kinser

feedproxy.google.com/~r/queerty2/~3/kJRX1hHV6No/this-air-force-captain-used-grindr-and-scruff-to-raise-59k-to-fight-hiv-20150604

These 8 Couples Are Ready for Marriage in Australia

These 8 Couples Are Ready for Marriage in Australia

The marriage equality debate in Australia has been reignited on the back of Ireland’s historic referendum legalizing same-sex marriage. Recent polls suggest public support for gay marriage in Australia is at an all-time high of 72 percent. These couples are chomping at the bit.

Daniel Moyer

www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2015/06/04/these-8-couples-are-ready-marriage-australia

As Caitlyn Jenner is Learning, Trans Equality is a Many-Layered Undertaking, Riddled with Paradox

As Caitlyn Jenner is Learning, Trans Equality is a Many-Layered Undertaking, Riddled with Paradox
Can a trans woman in the process of becoming authentic advance trans equality while simultaneously setting back women’s equality in the broader sense?

Eric Sasson, writing in The New Republic, put it well, with the headline mimicking Neil Armstrong from Tranquility Base, Luna – “One step forward for Caitlyn Jenner, one step back for womankind.” Six weeks after her coming-out interview with Diane Sawyer we now have the authentic Jenner for the world to see – Caitlyn on the cover of Vanity Fair. Her boudoir cover girl pose, recalling the starlets of the 30’s and 40’s. Introducing her new name, Caitlyn, disconcertingly more characteristic of millennials than Medicare recipients. The rollout set a new record for the Twitterverse, generating more new followers per unit time than anyone before her, including President Obama. Clearly she knows how to market herself well.

There’s been a lot of chatter in the trans community about this coming-out event, with many vociferously defending her right to do it her way. I agree – none of us gets a veto, and few have any input at all. Feminists who believe in full women’s empowerment, as I do, cannot honestly deprive her of her agency in this matter. I also imagine many of us would kill to be shot by Annie Leibovitz, showing us our 30-year-old (photoshopped) selves that never were, and it’s hard to begrudge an American icon that privilege.

Where we can weigh in, though, is on the potential consequences of her actions. She humbly stated in April that she is not a spokesperson for the trans community, and that she hopes she can make a positive contribution. Like it or not, however, she is now the world’s most recognizable trans woman, with no one else close in second place. That stature brings with it a great responsibility.

My concern, and my disappointment with her coming-out profile, was her doing so in a boudoir, pin-up girl pose. Yes, she’s gorgeous. Not bad for an old lady, and we should all look as good when we obtain our Medicare cards. But she could have, as the professional she is, presented herself in a manner that did not slide in so smoothly with the routine sexual objectification of the American woman, and that opens her, and by extension the rest of us, to the claim that she’s playing out an erotic fantasy.

There are those, such as Drs. Michael Bailey and Ray Blanchard, about whom I’ve recently written, who believe just that. This presentation, even when it succeeds as a marketing bonanza, plays right into their hands. We saw the pre-transition Bruce Jenner back in April; now in June we’re treated to a sex kitten.

We all know that Jenner, like most of us, were all once children who understood our transgender selves. That her struggle, as narrated to Diane Sawyer, began as a child in Tarrytown, New York, and was carried out in secret for nearly six decades. Facts like that get lost, however, when people who have never known anything about the transgender experience see Bruce one day in a shlumpy oversized polo shirt and then Caitlyn in a merry widow. Explaining the years it takes for a woman to fully transition gets lost in this rapid “now you see me, then you didn’t” sleight of hand.

This is not to say that trans women aren’t sexual beings with erotic feelings. Just as the gay community needed to bury their sexuality to present the full spectrum of the complexity of gay men and women, so have trans women needed to publicly subsume their sexuality to change the terms of the debate. Cisgender straight men and women don’t have the same problem, though all women have to deal with oversexualization, commodification and objectification. Keeping in mind that not only is she a woman but a part of the greater community of women might bring sufficient understanding to her to consider the larger ramifications. Rhonda Garelick puts it well in today’s New York Times:

The French writer Simone de Beauvoir famously wrote that “one is not born a woman, one becomes one.” She was referring to the innumerable embellishments, codes of behavior and self-censoring acts required by femininity, the turning of the self into a prestige commodity. In becoming a woman before our eyes, Caitlyn Jenner proves that little has changed since 1949, when de Beauvoir wrote those words. To be admired in the public eye, to be seen, a woman must still conform to an astonishingly long, often contradictory list of physical demands — the most important being that she not visibly age.

Trans women, uniquely among all women, have had to fight for recognition as females from a culture averse to scientific reality. In that atmosphere it is all the more important that we navigate the cultural shoals of gender expression and the codes of femininity with greater awareness of the impact of our actions.

When trans persons were finally included in the consideration of sex discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, I proudly stated that while I was no longer a 4th class citizen, I remained a 2nd class one with all my sisters. However important the battles against transmisogyny are, they are only a small part of the still overwhelming misogyny prevalent in American culture that impacts all women.

We’ve seen the same trans self-centeredness when a group of trans men demanded that women’s reproductive rights groups amend their language to exclude “women” in order to be more inclusive, ignoring the far greater impact of right-wing hostility on the reproductive autonomy and health of women. Similarly we’ve seen a small number of trans men trying to change the language used by women’s colleges, even though, arguably, as self-identified men, they shouldn’t have been accepted in the first place. Such behavior is particularly egregious when many of those women’s schools hadn’t even been willing to accept trans women at that time.

People have been calling Jenner a hero, a champion, and a role model. I haven’t heard anyone call her a leader, a title which she has wisely to date refused to embrace. But the reach of her public exposure, even before the Kardsashian machine goes into full gear, makes her a de facto leader, and that necessitates a strenuous effort on her part to put the community’s needs over her personal ones. This is understandably not an easy thing to do during her second puberty, but she owes it to the community to temper her behavior with some mature self-awareness.

It has been said that Jenner, being white, privileged, Christian, Republican, wealthy and old, is disqualified for this role. Clearly she can’t easily relate to those who don’t have her blessings, but at the end of the day the best she can be is herself. Truly recognizing that her personal needs take priority only when she’s out of the public eye is critical, and that the leadership that is being thrust upon her by her public persona necessitates full consideration for all those less fortunate whenever she speaks out or comes forward. The more beautiful she is, the more people pay attention, and the greater the responsibility. If this is too much of a burden she can do what she described as her future plans – spend her retirement with her children and grandchildren. While there will probably always be paparazzi around, such activities are worlds apart from an Annie Leibovitz spread in terms of their impact on the public. I can only hope that she has at least one confidant who can assist her as she ventures out into the full glare of the reality show universe. Much of our future progress towards equality may depend on it.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-beyer/as-caitlyn-jenner-is-lear_b_7508604.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices&ir=Gay+Voices